SkillAgentSearch skills...

abridge-webhooks-events

Implement and verify callbacks only from an approved tenant-specific Abridge event contract, with replay and PHI protections

Install / Use

npx skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill abridge-webhooks-events

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

87/100

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of abridge-webhooks-events

abridge-webhooks-events scores 87/100 on our quality scale, 413th of 867 Content & Media skills we index (top 48%).

Its SKILL.md is 4.7 KB long, well organised into 13 sections with 1 code example: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.

With 2,785 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
26/30
Structure
17/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
15/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 5 days ago, so abridge-webhooks-events is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

abridge-webhooks-events compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than abridge-webhooks-events; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
abridge-webhooks-events (this skill)by jeremylongshore872.8k5d agoSKILL.md
siyuanby siyuan-note10046.6ktodayMCP Server
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k7d agoSKILL.md
pptxby anthropics100177.9k7d agoSKILL.md
designby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k8d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install abridge-webhooks-events?
Run npx skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill abridge-webhooks-events. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does abridge-webhooks-events work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is abridge-webhooks-events safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is abridge-webhooks-events still maintained?
The repository was last updated 5 days ago, so abridge-webhooks-events is actively maintained.

name: abridge-webhooks-events description: "Implement and verify callbacks only from an approved tenant-specific Abridge event contract, with replay and PHI protections. Use when vendor implementation documents authorize event delivery. Trigger with "build the Abridge event handler"." argument-hint: "[contract-revision] [event-purpose]" allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, WebFetch, Write, Edit version: 1.5.0 author: Jeremy Longshore jeremy@intentsolutions.io license: MIT tags:

  • saas
  • abridge
  • events
  • callbacks
  • idempotency model: inherit effort: high compatibility: Designed for Claude Code; live work requires an authorized Abridge tenant, approved test data, and health-system change authority

Abridge Partner Event Contract Handler

Overview

Build a fail-closed receiver whose transport, authentication, event names, schema, delivery semantics, and registration process come from the approved private contract. If no such contract exists, produce a polling or manual handoff design instead of inventing webhooks.

Prerequisites

  • The authorized Abridge environment, clinical owner, and health-system policy set
  • Current tenant-specific implementation evidence for every private interface in scope
  • Synthetic data or the organization's formally approved test-record procedure

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect repository configuration, adapters, tests, policies, and existing evidence. Use WebFetch only for current official Abridge, HHS, or named EHR documentation. Use Write or Edit only after confirming scope, environment, owners, patient-data boundary, and approval state. These tools do not confer access to Abridge, an EHR, or a clinical record; return exact operator steps or an approval-gated handoff for live actions.

Current Contract

  • The cited public Abridge materials do not publish a universal webhook catalog, HMAC header, registration endpoint, or retry schedule.
  • Session or encounter identifiers can be sensitive even when a payload omits note text.
  • Duplicate, delayed, and out-of-order delivery must not duplicate EHR actions.

Authentication

Use only the health system's provisioned Abridge application access, SSO, administrative role, or tenant-specific partner authentication documented for the approved environment. Do not infer public API credentials, reuse production secrets in tests, or expose tokens and session material. Verify identity owner, least privilege, environment binding, storage, rotation, and revocation before any authenticated action.

Instructions

  1. Verify contract owner, revision, event purpose, transport, authentication, schema, ordering, retry, retention, and support route.
  2. Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect the receiver, queue, idempotency store, logs, and downstream action boundary.
  3. Reject unknown events and fields according to contract; authenticate before parsing sensitive content and cap body size and age.
  4. Persist an opaque event key and processing state; design duplicates, replays, gaps, poison events, and manual reconciliation.
  5. Use Write or Edit to add the handler and synthetic contract tests without committing private payload examples.
  6. Use WebFetch only for official workflow context; do not derive protocol details from marketing pages.

Approval Boundaries

Do not expose a callback publicly, register it with a vendor tenant, or enable downstream clinical writes without security, network, vendor, and EHR change approval.

Output

Return contract revision, authenticated boundary, accepted events, rejection policy, idempotency model, retention, test evidence, and unimplemented assumptions. Separate verified facts, tenant-specific evidence, assumptions, and actions still awaiting approval.

Error Handling

| Condition | Response | |---|---| | No approved event contract | Do not implement a webhook; propose a bounded alternative. | | Authentication is ambiguous | Reject all deliveries until resolved. | | Duplicate may repeat a clinical action | Quarantine and require reconciliation. |

Example

The example is a redacted operational receipt, not patient data or proof of vendor certification.

contract=partner-events-r3; auth=contract-defined; accepted=2; unknown=reject; duplicate-test=pass; live-registration=no

Resources

Read the source map before changing a workflow. Recheck tenant-specific implementation evidence for every interface or capability that public documentation does not define.

Next Steps

Revalidate the evidence date and tenant-specific authority before repeating this workflow in another environment, cohort, care setting, or integration mode.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars2.8k
CategoryContent
Updated5d ago
Forks404

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions