14,556 skills found ¡ Page 300 of 486
brycewang-stanford / aeri-replication-packageUse when assembling the data and code deposit for an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) short-format manuscript to pass the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy and the AEA Data Editor's pre-publication reproducibility check.
brycewang-stanford / aeri-robustnessUse when deciding which robustness checks belong in the few in-text words of an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) short-format manuscript versus the online Supplemental Appendix. Triages checks against the length cap; it does not design the identification (see aeri-identification).
brycewang-stanford / aeri-submissionUse when running the final pre-submission preflight for American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) via the AEA/ScholarOne submission system â the word-count and exhibit-count gates, abstract limit, fees, author metadata, declarations, and the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy.
brycewang-stanford / aeri-tables-figuresUse when building or trimming the exhibits of an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) short-format manuscript to the hard five-exhibit budget, one page each, no significance asterisks. Designs the minimum exhibit set; it does not run the analysis behind them.
brycewang-stanford / aeri-theory-modelUse when a model â a full theory paper's argument or the structural/conceptual scaffolding behind an empirical AER: Insights short-format manuscript â needs to be made minimal, so it carries the single insight in a few pages.
brycewang-stanford / aeri-topic-selectionUse when deciding whether a project is the ONE crisp, important, well-identified insight that an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) short-format manuscript requires, rather than a multi-result paper for AER or a field paper for the AEJ family.
brycewang-stanford / aeri-writing-styleUse when revising an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) short-format manuscript to lead with the result, fit the hard word cap (7,000 words minus 200 per exhibit), and write the â¤100-word abstract.
brycewang-stanford / ase-artifact-evaluationUse when preparing an accepted ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) paper's tool and data for the Artifact Evaluation track, targeting the ACM Artifacts Available and Artifacts Reusable badges on the track's own deadline, with the badge shown on the paper's front page in both IEEE Xplore anâĻ
brycewang-stanford / ase-supplementaryUse when deciding what belongs in the 10-page ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) paper body versus the artifact and supplementary material, splitting content by decision-criticality so nothing that decides acceptance lives outside the reviewed pages under the 10+2 budget.
brycewang-stanford / ase-writing-styleUse when shaping the prose and structure of an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research paper, covering the automation-first first-page arc, stating the automated task precisely, keeping the tool runnable and the model-swap test in mind, threats-as-argument, and the 10+2 page disciplinâĻ
brycewang-stanford / atc-author-responseUse when writing the ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) rebuttal and the shepherd's description-of-changes â the short round-two response that corrects factual misreadings and supplies requested measurements, and the point-by-point revision record a conditional-acceptaâĻ
brycewang-stanford / atc-reproducibilityUse when building the reproducibility story for an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper â pinning testbed and software environments, providing a turnkey path from the artifact to the headline numbers, and preparing an anonymized-but-runnable review packageâĻ
brycewang-stanford / atc-topic-selectionUse when deciding whether a computer-systems project belongs at ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) or should be routed to OSDI, SOSP, NSDI, EuroSys, FAST, or a workshop like HotOS/HotStorage â distinguishing ATC by its broad practical scope, its Deployed Systems / expeâĻ
brycewang-stanford / atc-writing-styleUse when drafting or revising an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper â writing a self-standing two-page extended abstract for the round-one gate, structuring the implementation-and-measurement narrative, reporting costs beside gains, and holding the two-coâĻ
brycewang-stanford / amann-review-processUse when planning around the two-step proposalâinvited-review process of the Academy of Management Annals (Annals) â the twice-yearly proposal cadence, double-blind proposal review, the editor-only full-review development, and timelines.
brycewang-stanford / amann-submissionUse when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) proposal or invited full review via the Manuscript Central portal â proposal-vs-invited-review route, deadlines, formatting, CV, and anonymity. Final checks; it does not draft content.
brycewang-stanford / amann-tables-figuresUse when building exhibits for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review â the signature framework figure, who-studied-what synthesis tables, and search/coverage exhibits that summarize across a literature.
brycewang-stanford / amann-writing-styleUse when revising an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review for the house voice â authoritative, integrative, agenda-setting "reviews with an attitude," with a strong problem-first opening and a contribution-stating abstract.
brycewang-stanford / amj-contribution-framingUse when turning results into an explicit theoretical contribution for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript â the "what new theory do we learn?" statement and the discussion section.
brycewang-stanford / amj-literature-positioningUse when the front end of an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript needs to engage the right literatures and stake a clear position in an ongoing theoretical conversation.
brycewang-stanford / amj-rebuttalUse when drafting the revision and response letter after an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) revise-and-resubmit â structuring point-by-point responses to the action editor and reviewers across a multi-round developmental process.
brycewang-stanford / amj-review-processUse when you need to understand or set expectations for the Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) editorial and peer-review process â desk review, the developmental multi-round R&R culture, and reading a decision letter.
brycewang-stanford / amj-tables-figuresUse when building or cleaning the tables and figures for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript â correlation tables, regression/SEM/HLM result tables, the theoretical-model figure, and interaction plots in AOM house style.
brycewang-stanford / amj-theory-developmentUse when the theoretical argument and hypotheses are the bottleneck for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript â building a mechanism and deriving testable hypotheses a priori.
brycewang-stanford / amj-topic-selectionUse when scoping or sanity-checking a research question for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript â fit, theory-drivenness, and feasibility.
brycewang-stanford / amj-writing-styleUse for full-manuscript prose polish of an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript â front-loading the argument, active voice, structure, and AOM house style.
brycewang-stanford / amr-contribution-framingUse when articulating and differentiating the theoretical contribution of an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript â showing precisely what is NEW versus prior theory and why it matters.
brycewang-stanford / amr-literature-positioningUse when you must identify which theoretical conversation an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript enters and how it "challenges and extends" that conversation.
brycewang-stanford / amr-review-processUse when you need to understand the Academy of Management Review (AMR) developmental, multi-round review and interpret a decision letter focused on theoretical novelty and logical soundness. Explains the process and decision types; it does NOT draft the response document (that is amr-rebuttal).
brycewang-stanford / aaai-artifact-evaluationUse when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.
