amann-submission
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) proposal or invited full review via the Manuscript Central portal — proposal-vs-invited-review route, deadlines, formatting, CV, and anonymity. Final checks; it does not draft content.
Install / Use
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-submissionInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
SKILL.md
Installable skill definition
Quality Score
Category
Development & EngineeringSupported Platforms
Our assessment of amann-submission
amann-submission scores 85/100 on our quality scale, 2309th of 4,615 Development & Engineering skills we index.
Its SKILL.md is 4.5 KB long, well organised into 11 sections with 1 code example: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.
With 1,158 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.
Maintenance, license and trust
- The repository was last updated 19 days ago, so amann-submission is actively maintained.
- It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
- Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
amann-submission compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than amann-submission; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| amann-submission (this skill)by brycewang-stanford | 85 | 1.2k | 19d ago | SKILL.md |
| ai-job-searchby MadsLorentzen | 100 | 44.9k | 1d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| claude-howtoby luongnv89 | 100 | 41.7k | 3d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| algorithmic-artby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 11d ago | SKILL.md |
| pptxby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 11d ago | SKILL.md |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install amann-submission?
- Run
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-submission. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does amann-submission work with?
- It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is amann-submission safe to use?
- It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is amann-submission still maintained?
- The repository was last updated 19 days ago, so amann-submission is actively maintained.
Skill content
View source on GitHubname: amann-submission description: Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) proposal or invited full review via the Manuscript Central portal — proposal-vs-invited-review route, deadlines, formatting, CV, and anonymity. Final checks; it does not draft content.
Submission Preflight (amann-submission)
When to trigger
- A deadline is near — last check before uploading a proposal to Manuscript Central
- A proposal was accepted and you are submitting the invited full review
- Confirming format, CV, and anonymity requirements for the right route
- Unsure which files the portal expects for a proposal vs. a full review
Process facts (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准 — re-confirm on the AOM/Annals pages)
- Publisher / venue. Annals is the Academy of Management's review-of-the-field journal, published with Taylor & Francis. It is distinct from AMR (original theory) and AMJ (empirical). Submission is via Manuscript Central:
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/aomannals. - Two routes, in order. (1) Proposal — the mandatory gate: ≤5 pages, single-spaced, 1-inch margins, 12pt, with the four headings (Focus of the review / Related reviews / Review scope and process / New insights); references and visuals do not count. (2) Invited full review — submitted only after a proposal is accepted; typically ~50 pages of text plus tables/figures/refs.
- Deadlines. Proposals are on a twice-yearly cycle — April 1 and October 1; not reviewed until the deadline passes; decisions ~6 weeks after the deadline. Two issues publish per year (January and July).
- Anonymity. Proposals are double-blind (reviewed by the Associate Editors) — anonymize the proposal. The invited full review forgoes double-blind (read by the Associate Editor and Editor), so anonymity requirements differ between the two routes — confirm current rules on the portal.
- CV. A current CV may be required for the editors' eyes only (not seen by reviewers) — confirm at submission (待核实).
- Style / format. Follow the current Annals/Taylor & Francis author guidelines for manuscript format and references (house style 待核实 — confirm APA vs. other on the live page). Length, abstract, and exact formatting specifics are volatile.
- Fees / APC. Any submission fee or APC is volatile — re-confirm on the official pages; do not assert an amount.
Preflight checklist
Route & files
- [ ] Route chosen: proposal (≤5pp, four headings) or invited full review (after acceptance)
- [ ] Proposal uses the four required headings verbatim and meets the ≤5pp / single-spaced / 1-in / 12pt limit
- [ ] Targeting the correct April 1 / October 1 deadline
- [ ] Full review (if invited) within the expected ~50-page norm; tables/figures/refs prepared
Front matter
- [ ] Title, abstract (review-style — contribution to the field), and keywords present
- [ ] Author affiliations complete; CV prepared if required (editors-only)
Anonymity & declarations
- [ ] Proposal anonymized for double-blind review (proposal route)
- [ ] Full-review anonymity handled per current rules (it forgoes double-blind)
- [ ] Confirmed not under review elsewhere; AI not listed as an author
Volatile re-confirms
- [ ] Portal specifics, fee/APC, CV requirement, house style, anonymity — re-checked on AOM/Annals pages (检索于 2026-06)
Anti-patterns
- Uploading a full review without an accepted proposal — out of process at Annals
- A proposal that exceeds 5 pages or omits one of the four required headings
- Missing the April 1 / October 1 window because intake was assumed to be rolling
- Asserting a fee/APC or editor name from memory rather than the live page
- Failing to anonymize the proposal (it is double-blind) or mishandling the full-review anonymity difference
- A primary-paper abstract on a review submission
Output format
【Route】proposal (≤5pp, 4 headings) / invited full review (~50pp)
【Deadline】targeting April 1 / October 1? <which>
【Proposal headings】Focus / Related reviews / Scope & process / New insights present? Y/N
【Anonymity】proposal anonymized (double-blind); full-review rule confirmed? Y/N
【CV】prepared if required (editors-only)? Y/N
【Volatile re-confirms】portal / fee / style / anonymity checked on AOM page? Y/N
【Next step】submit via Manuscript Central → amann-review-process for what to expect
Supplementary resources
templates/checklist.md— submission self-checktemplates/manuscript_template.md— lightweight manuscript scaffold
Related Skills
ai-job-search
44.9kThe job search that runs on your machine. AI job application framework built on Claude Code: evaluate postings, tailor CVs, write cover letters, prep interviews. Fork it and own it.
claude-howto
41.7kA visual, example-driven guide to Claude Code — from basic concepts to advanced agents, with copy-paste templates that bring immediate value.
algorithmic-art
177.9kCreating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems.
pptx
177.9kUse this skill any time a .pptx or .potx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx or .potx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an em…
Languages
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
