SkillAgentSearch skills...

team-composition-analysis

Design optimal team structures, hiring plans, compensation strategies, and equity allocation for early-stage startups from pre-seed through Series A.

Install / Use

npx skills add wshobson/agents --skill team-composition-analysis

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

98/100

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of team-composition-analysis

team-composition-analysis scores 98/100 on our quality scale, 1st of 11 Human Resources skills we index (top 10%).

Its SKILL.md is 7.3 KB long, well organised into 28 sections with 6 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.

With 39,920 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
29/30
Structure
20/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
20/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 4 days ago, so team-composition-analysis is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

Safety scan

No issues found

Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands.

Automated pattern scan on 2026-09-25. It catches known dangerous patterns, not every risk — read a skill before letting an agent act on it.

team-composition-analysis compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than team-composition-analysis; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
team-composition-analysis (this skill)by wshobson9839.9k4d agoSKILL.md
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k2d agoSKILL.md
pptxby anthropics100177.9k2d agoSKILL.md
designby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k3d agoSKILL.md
ui-ux-pro-maxby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k3d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install team-composition-analysis?
Run npx skills add wshobson/agents --skill team-composition-analysis. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does team-composition-analysis work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is team-composition-analysis safe to use?
Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is team-composition-analysis still maintained?
The repository was last updated 4 days ago, so team-composition-analysis is actively maintained.

name: team-composition-analysis description: Design optimal team structures, hiring plans, compensation strategies, and equity allocation for early-stage startups from pre-seed through Series A. Use this skill when planning headcount, determining which roles to hire next, setting compensation or equity ranges, designing org structure, or building a hiring budget aligned to funding milestones. version: 1.0.0

Team Composition Analysis

Design optimal team structures, hiring plans, compensation strategies, and equity allocation for early-stage startups from pre-seed through Series A.

Overview

Build the right team at the right time with appropriate compensation and equity. Plan role-by-role hiring aligned with revenue milestones, budget constraints, and market benchmarks.

Team Structure by Stage

Pre-Seed (0-$500K ARR)

Team Size: 2-5 people

Core Roles:

  • Founders (2-3): Product, engineering, business
  • First engineer (if needed)
  • Contract roles: Design, marketing

Focus: Build and validate product-market fit

Seed ($500K-$2M ARR)

Team Size: 5-15 people

Key Hires:

  • Engineering lead + 2-3 engineers
  • First sales/business development
  • Product manager
  • Marketing/growth lead

Focus: Scale product and prove repeatable sales

Series A ($2M-$10M ARR)

Team Size: 15-50 people

Department Build-Out:

  • Engineering (40%): 6-20 people
  • Sales & Marketing (30%): 5-15 people
  • Customer Success (10%): 2-5 people
  • G&A (10%): 2-5 people
  • Product (10%): 2-5 people

Focus: Scale revenue and build repeatable processes

Detailed section: Role-by-Role Planning

Originally a 1720-byte section in this SKILL.md. Moved to references/details.md to fit Codex's 8 KB skill body cap.

Compensation Strategy

Base Salary Benchmarks (US, 2024)

Engineering:

  • Junior: $90K-$120K
  • Mid-Level: $120K-$150K
  • Senior: $150K-$180K
  • Staff/Principal: $180K-$220K
  • Engineering Manager: $160K-$200K
  • VP Engineering: $180K-$250K

Sales:

  • SDR/BDR: $50K-$70K base + $50K-$70K commission
  • Account Executive: $80K-$120K base + $80K-$120K commission
  • Sales Manager: $120K-$160K base + $80K-$120K commission
  • VP Sales: $150K-$200K base + $150K-$200K commission

Product:

  • Product Manager: $120K-$150K
  • Senior PM: $150K-$180K
  • Head of Product: $150K-$180K
  • VP Product: $180K-$220K

Marketing:

  • Marketing Manager: $90K-$130K
  • Content/Demand Gen: $70K-$100K
  • Head of Marketing: $130K-$170K
  • VP Marketing: $150K-$200K

Customer Success:

  • CS Representative: $60K-$90K
  • CS Manager: $100K-$130K
  • VP Customer Success: $140K-$180K

Total Compensation Formula

Total Comp = Base Salary × 1.30 (benefits & taxes) + Equity Value

Fully-Loaded Cost:

  • Base salary
  • Payroll taxes (7.65% FICA)
  • Benefits (health insurance, 401k): $10K-$15K per employee
  • Other (workspace, equipment, software): $5K-$10K per employee

Rule of Thumb: Multiply base salary by 1.3-1.4 for fully-loaded cost

Geographic Adjustments

San Francisco / New York: +20-30% above benchmarks Seattle / Boston / Los Angeles: +10-20% Austin / Denver / Chicago: +0-10% Remote / Other US Cities: -10-20% International: Varies widely by country

Equity Allocation

Equity by Role and Stage

Founders:

  • First founder: 40-60%
  • Second founder: 20-40%
  • Third founder: 10-20%
  • Vesting: 4 years with 1-year cliff

Early Employees (Pre-Seed):

  • First engineer: 0.5-2.0%
  • First 5 employees: 0.25-1.0% each

Seed Stage Hires:

  • VP/Head level: 0.5-1.5%
  • Senior IC: 0.1-0.5%
  • Mid-level: 0.05-0.25%
  • Junior: 0.01-0.1%

Series A Hires:

  • C-level (CTO, CFO): 1.0-3.0%
  • VP level: 0.3-1.0%
  • Director level: 0.1-0.5%
  • Senior IC: 0.05-0.2%
  • Mid-level: 0.01-0.1%
  • Junior: 0.005-0.05%

Equity Pool Sizing

Option Pool by Round:

  • Pre-Seed: 10-15% reserved
  • Seed: 10-15% top-up
  • Series A: 10-15% top-up
  • Series B+: 5-10% per round

Pre-Funding Dilution: Investors often require option pool creation before investment, diluting founders.

Example:

Pre-money: $10M
Investors want 15% option pool post-money

Calculation:
Post-money: $15M ($10M + $5M investment)
Option pool: $2.25M (15% × $15M)
Founders diluted by pool creation before new money

Organizational Design

Reporting Structure

Pre-Seed:

Founders (flat structure)
├── Contractors
└── First hires (report to founders)

Seed:

CEO
├── Engineering Lead (2-4 engineers)
├── Sales/Growth Lead (1-2 reps)
├── Product Manager
└── Operations

Series A:

CEO
├── CTO / VP Engineering (6-20 people)
│   ├── Engineering Manager(s)
│   └── Individual Contributors
├── VP Sales (5-15 people)
│   ├── Sales Manager
│   ├── Account Executives
│   └── SDRs
├── Head of Product (2-5 people)
│   ├── Product Managers
│   └── Designers
├── Head of Customer Success (2-5 people)
└── CFO / Finance Lead (2-5 people)
    ├── Recruiter
    └── Operations

Span of Control

Manager Ratios:

  • First-line managers: 4-8 direct reports
  • Directors: 3-5 direct reports (managers)
  • VPs: 3-5 direct reports (directors)
  • CEO: 5-8 direct reports (executive team)

Full-Time vs. Contract

Use Full-Time for:

  • Core product development
  • Sales (revenue-generating roles)
  • Mission-critical operations
  • Institutional knowledge roles

Use Contractors for:

  • Specialized short-term needs (legal, accounting)
  • Variable workload (design, marketing campaigns)
  • Skills outside core competency
  • Testing role before FTE hire
  • Geographic expansion before permanent presence

Cost Comparison

Full-Time:

  • Lower hourly cost
  • Benefits and overhead
  • Long-term commitment
  • Cultural fit matters

Contract:

  • Higher hourly rate ($75-$200/hour vs. $40-$100/hour FTE equivalent)
  • No benefits or overhead
  • Flexible engagement
  • Easier to scale up/down

Hiring Velocity

Realistic Timeline

Role Opening to Hire:

  • Junior: 6-8 weeks
  • Mid-Level: 8-12 weeks
  • Senior: 12-16 weeks
  • Executive: 16-24 weeks

Time to Productivity:

  • Junior: 4-6 months
  • Mid-Level: 2-4 months
  • Senior: 1-3 months
  • Executive: 3-6 months

Planning Buffer

Always add 2-3 months buffer to hiring plans.

Example: If need engineer by July 1:

  • Start recruiting: April 1 (12 weeks)
  • Productivity: September 1 (2 months ramp)

Budget Planning

Compensation as % of Revenue

Early Stage (Seed):

  • Total comp: 120-150% of revenue (burning cash to grow)
  • Engineering: 50-60%
  • Sales: 30-40%
  • Other: 20-30%

Growth Stage (Series A):

  • Total comp: 70-100% of revenue
  • Engineering: 35-45%
  • Sales: 25-35%
  • Other: 20-30%

Headcount Budget Formula

Total Comp Budget = Σ (Role Count × Fully-Loaded Cost × % of Year)

Example:
3 Engineers × $202K × 100% = $606K
2 AEs × $230K × 75% (mid-year start) = $345K
1 PM × $162K × 100% = $162K
Total: $1.1M

Quick Start

To plan team composition:

  1. Identify stage - Pre-seed, seed, or Series A
  2. Define roles - What functions are needed now
  3. Prioritize hires - Critical path for business goals
  4. Set compensation - Base salary + equity by level
  5. Plan timeline - Account for recruiting and ramp time
  6. Calculate budget - Fully-loaded cost × headcount
  7. Design org chart - Reporting structure and span of control
  8. Allocate equity - Fair allocation that preserves pool

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars39.9k
CategoryHuman
Updated4d ago
Forks4.3k

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions