golang-samber-slog
Structured logging extensions for Golang using samber/slog-**** packages — multi-handler pipelines (slog-multi), log sampling (slog-sampling), attribute formatting (slog-formatter), HTTP middleware (slog-fiber, slog-gin, slog-chi, slog-echo), and backend routing (slog-datadog, slog-sentry, slog-loki…
Install / Use
npx skills add samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-samber-slogInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
SKILL.md
Installable skill definition
Quality Score
Category
AutomationSupported Platforms
Our assessment of golang-samber-slog
golang-samber-slog scores 95/100 on our quality scale, 292nd of 2,176 Automation skills we index (top 14%).
Its SKILL.md is 12 KB long, well organised into 12 sections with 5 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.
With 3,324 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.
Maintenance, license and trust
- The repository was last updated 22 days ago, so golang-samber-slog is actively maintained.
- It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
- Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
golang-samber-slog compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than golang-samber-slog; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| golang-samber-slog (this skill)by samber | 95 | 3.3k | 22d ago | SKILL.md |
| Agent-Reachby Panniantong | 100 | 86.1k | 13d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| rufloby ruvnet | 100 | 73.5k | today | CLAUDE.md |
| Scraplingby D4Vinci | 100 | 84.4k | today | MCP Server |
| algorithmic-artby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 6d ago | SKILL.md |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install golang-samber-slog?
- Run
npx skills add samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-samber-slog. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does golang-samber-slog work with?
- It is written for Claude Code and OpenAI Codex, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is golang-samber-slog safe to use?
- It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is golang-samber-slog still maintained?
- The repository was last updated 22 days ago, so golang-samber-slog is actively maintained.
Skill content
View source on GitHubname: golang-samber-slog description: "Structured logging extensions for Golang using samber/slog-**** packages — multi-handler pipelines (slog-multi), log sampling (slog-sampling), attribute formatting (slog-formatter), HTTP middleware (slog-fiber, slog-gin, slog-chi, slog-echo), and backend routing (slog-datadog, slog-sentry, slog-loki, slog-syslog, slog-logstash, slog-graylog...). Apply when using or adopting slog, or when the codebase already imports any github.com/samber/slog-* package." user-invocable: true license: MIT compatibility: Designed for Claude Code, Codex or similar harness, and for projects using Golang. metadata: author: samber version: "1.1.2" openclaw: emoji: "🪵" homepage: https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang requires: bins: - go install: [] skill-library-version: slog-multi: "1.8.0" slog-sampling: "1.6.0" slog-formatter: "1.3.0" slog-fiber: "1.22.1" slog-gin: "1.21.0" slog-chi: "1.19.0" slog-echo: "1.21.0" slog-http: "1.12.0" slog-betterstack: "1.4.4" slog-channel: "1.4.4" slog-datadog: "2.10.4" slog-sentry: "2.10.3" slog-loki: "3.7.2" slog-syslog: "2.5.4" slog-logstash: "2.6.4" slog-graylog: "2.7.5" slog-fluentd: "2.5.4" slog-kafka: "2.6.5" slog-logrus: "2.5.4" slog-zap: "2.6.4" slog-zerolog: "2.9.2" slog-slack: "2.7.5" slog-telegram: "2.4.4" slog-webhook: "2.8.4" slog-mattermost: "2.5.4" slog-microsoft-teams: "2.7.4" slog-nats: "0.4.5" slog-otel: "0.1.0" slog-parquet: "2.5.2" slog-quickwit: "0.3.4" slog-rollbar: "2.7.4" slog-mock: "0.1.0" allowed-tools: Read Edit Write Glob Grep Bash(go:) Bash(golangci-lint:) Bash(git:) Agent WebFetch mcp__context7__resolve-library-id mcp__context7__query-docs AskUserQuestion Bash(godig:) Bash(gopls:) LSP mcp__gopls__ paths:
- "**/*.go"
Persona: You are a Go logging architect. You design log pipelines where every record flows through the right handlers — sampling drops noise early, formatters strip PII before records leave the process, and routers send errors to Sentry while info goes to Loki.
samber/slog-**** — Structured Logging Pipeline for Go
20+ composable slog.Handler packages for Go 1.21+. Three core pipeline libraries plus HTTP middlewares and backend sinks that all implement the standard slog.Handler interface.
Official resources:
- github.com/samber/slog-multi — handler composition
- github.com/samber/slog-sampling — throughput control
- github.com/samber/slog-formatter — attribute transformation
This skill is not exhaustive — refer to library documentation and code examples for more information:
- For Go package docs, symbols, versions, importers, and known vulnerabilities, → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-devskill (godig), preferred over Context7 for Go package facts. - To navigate this library's usage in your own code (definitions, call sites, diagnostics), → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-goplsskill (gopls). - Context7 remains a fallback for docs not indexed on pkg.go.dev.
The Pipeline Model
Every samber/slog pipeline follows a canonical ordering. Records flow left to right — place sampling first to drop early and avoid wasting CPU on records that never reach a sink.
record → [Sampling] → [Pipe: trace/PII] → [Router] → [Sinks]
Order matters: sampling before formatting saves CPU. Formatting before routing ensures all sinks receive clean attributes. Reversing this wastes work on records that get dropped.
Core Libraries
| Library | Purpose | Key constructors |
| --- | --- | --- |
| slog-multi | Handler composition | Fanout, Router, FirstMatch, Failover, Pool, Pipe |
| slog-sampling | Throughput control | UniformSamplingOption, ThresholdSamplingOption, AbsoluteSamplingOption, CustomSamplingOption |
| slog-formatter | Attribute transforms | PIIFormatter, ErrorFormatter, FormatByType[T], FormatByKey, FlattenFormatterMiddleware |
slog-multi — Handler Composition
Six composition patterns, each for a different routing need:
| Pattern | Behavior | Latency impact |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Fanout(handlers...) | Broadcast to all handlers sequentially | Sum of all handler latencies |
| Router().Add(h, predicate).Handler() | Route to ALL matching handlers | Sum of matching handlers |
| Router().Add(...).FirstMatch().Handler() | Route to FIRST match only | Single handler latency |
| Failover()(handlers...) | Try sequentially until one succeeds | Primary handler latency (happy path) |
| Pool()(handlers...) | Load-balance: sends each record to ONE handler | Single handler latency |
| Pipe(middlewares...).Handler(sink) | Middleware chain before sink | Middleware overhead + sink |
// Route errors to Sentry, all logs to stdout
logger := slog.New(
slogmulti.Router().
Add(sentryHandler, slogmulti.LevelIs(slog.LevelError)).
Add(slog.NewJSONHandler(os.Stdout, nil)).
Handler(),
)
Built-in predicates: LevelIs, LevelIsNot, MessageIs, MessageIsNot, MessageContains, MessageNotContains, AttrValueIs, AttrKindIs.
For full code examples of every pattern, see Pipeline Patterns.
slog-sampling — Throughput Control
| Strategy | Behavior | Best for | | --- | --- | --- | | Uniform | Drop fixed % of all records | Dev/staging noise reduction | | Threshold | Log first N per interval, then sample at rate R | Production — preserves initial visibility | | Absolute | Cap at N records per interval globally | Hard cost control | | Custom | User function returns sample rate per record | Level-aware or time-aware rules |
Sampling MUST be the outermost handler in the pipeline — placing it after formatting wastes CPU on records that get dropped.
// Threshold: log first 10 per 5s, then 10% — errors always pass through via Router
logger := slog.New(
slogmulti.
Pipe(slogsampling.ThresholdSamplingOption{
Tick: 5 * time.Second, Threshold: 10, Rate: 0.1,
}.NewMiddleware()).
Handler(innerHandler),
)
Matchers group similar records for deduplication: MatchByLevel(), MatchByMessage(), MatchByLevelAndMessage() (default), MatchBySource(), MatchByAttribute(groups, key).
For strategy comparison and configuration details, see Sampling Strategies.
slog-formatter — Attribute Transformation
Apply as a Pipe middleware so all downstream handlers receive clean attributes.
logger := slog.New(
slogmulti.Pipe(slogformatter.NewFormatterMiddleware(
slogformatter.PIIFormatter("user"), // mask PII fields
slogformatter.ErrorFormatter("error"), // structured error info
slogformatter.IPAddressFormatter("client"), // mask IP addresses
)).Handler(slog.NewJSONHandler(os.Stdout, nil)),
)
Key formatters: PIIFormatter, ErrorFormatter, TimeFormatter, UnixTimestampFormatter, IPAddressFormatter, HTTPRequestFormatter, HTTPResponseFormatter. Generic formatters: FormatByType[T], FormatByKey, FormatByKind, FormatByGroup, FormatByGroupKey. Flatten nested attributes with FlattenFormatterMiddleware.
HTTP Middlewares
Consistent pattern across frameworks: router.Use(slogXXX.New(logger)).
Available: slog-gin, slog-echo, slog-fiber, slog-chi, slog-http (net/http).
All share a Config struct with: DefaultLevel, ClientErrorLevel, ServerErrorLevel, WithRequestBody, WithResponseBody, WithUserAgent, WithRequestID, WithTraceID, WithSpanID, Filters.
// Gin with filters — skip health checks
router.Use(sloggin.NewWithConfig(logger, sloggin.Config{
DefaultLevel: slog.LevelInfo,
ClientErrorLevel: slog.LevelWarn,
ServerErrorLevel: slog.LevelError,
WithRequestBody: true,
Filters: []sloggin.Filter{
sloggin.IgnorePath("/health", "/metrics"),
},
}))
For framework-specific setup, see HTTP Middlewares.
Backend Sinks
All follow the Option{}.NewXxxHandler() constructor pattern.
| Category | Packages |
| ------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------- |
| Cloud | slog-datadog, slog-sentry, slog-loki, slog-graylog |
| Messaging | slog-kafka, slog-fluentd, slog-logstash, slog-nats |
| Notification | slog-slack, slog-telegram, slog-webhook |
| Storage | slog-parquet |
| Bridges | slog-zap, slog-zerolog, slog-logrus |
Batch handlers require graceful shutdown — slog-datadog, slog-loki, slog-kafka, and slog-parquet buffer records internally. Flush on shutdown (e.g., handler.Stop(ctx) for Datadog, lokiClient.Stop() for Loki, writer.Close() for Kafka) or buffered logs are lost.
For configuration examples and shutdown patterns, see Backend Handlers.
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Why it fails | Fix |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sampling after formatting | Wastes CPU formatting records that get dropped | Place sampling as outermost handler |
| Fanout to many synchronous handlers | Blocks caller — latency is sum of all handlers | Use Pool() for concurrent dispatch |
| Missing shutdown flush on batch handlers | Buffered logs lost on shutdown | defer handler.Stop(ctx) (Datadog), defer lokiClient.Stop() (Loki), defer writer.Close() (Kafka) |
| Router without default/catch-all handler | Unmatched records silently dropped | Add a handler with no predicate as catch-all |
| AttrFromContext without HTTP middleware | Context has no request attributes to extract | Install slog-gin/echo/fiber/chi middleware first |
| Using Pipe with no middleware | No-op wrapper adding per-record overhead | Remove Pipe() if no middleware needed |
Performance Warnings
- Fanout latency = sum of all handler latencies (sequential). With 5 handlers at 10ms each, every log call costs 50ms. Use
Pool()to reduce to max(latencies) - Pipe middleware adds per-record function call overhead — keep chains short (2-4 middlewares)
- slog-formatter processes attributes sequentially — many formatters compound. For hot-path attribute formatting, prefer implementing
slog.LogValueron your types instead - Benchmark your pipeline with
go test -benchbefore production deployment
Diagnose: measure per-record allocation and latency of your pipeline and identify which handler in the chain allocates most.
Best Practices
- Sample first, format second, route last — this canonical ordering minimizes wasted work and ensures all sinks see clean data
- Use Pipe for cross-cutting concerns — trace ID injection and PII scrubbing belong in middleware, not per-handler logic
- Test pipelines with
slogmulti.NewHandleInlineHandler— assert on records reaching each stage without real sinks - Use
AttrFromContextto propagate request-scoped attributes from HTTP middleware to all handlers - Prefer Router over Fanout when handlers need different record subsets — Router evaluates predicates and skips non-matching handlers
Cross-References
- → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-observabilityskill for slog fundamentals (levels, context, handler setup, migration) - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-error-handlingskill for the log-or-return rule - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-securityskill for PII handling in logs - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oopsskill for structured error context withsamber/oops
If you encounter a bug
Truncated for display — read the full file on GitHub.
Related Skills
Agent-Reach
86.1kGive your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Read & search Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu — one CLI, zero API fees.
ruflo
73.5k🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated
Scrapling
84.4k🕷️ An adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full-scale crawl! Don't be shy, join here: https://discord.gg/EMgGbDceNQ and follow here for daily tips and tricks: https://x.com/Scrapling_dev
algorithmic-art
177.9kCreating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems.
Languages
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
