SkillAgentSearch skills...

document

Use when asked to document Elixir code: add or fill in @moduledoc and @doc for modules and functions. Documents tested code only; may add a README section or ADR. Not for docs lookup or audits.

Install / Use

npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill document

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

85/100

Supported Platforms

Claude Code

Our assessment of document

document scores 85/100 on our quality scale, 683rd of 1,215 Content & Media skills we index.

Its SKILL.md is 3.0 KB long, well organised into 9 sections with 2 code examples: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.

It has 560 GitHub stars, a meaningful sign that others use it.

Substance
26/30
Structure
18/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
12/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 2 days ago, so document is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

document compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than document; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
document (this skill)by oliver-kriska855602d agoSKILL.md
siyuanby siyuan-note10046.6ktodayMCP Server
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k11d agoSKILL.md
pptxby anthropics100177.9k11d agoSKILL.md
designby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k12d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install document?
Run npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill document. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does document work with?
It is written for Claude Code, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is document safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is document still maintained?
The repository was last updated 2 days ago, so document is actively maintained.

name: document description: "Use when asked to document Elixir code: add or fill in @moduledoc and @doc for modules and functions. Documents tested code only; may add a README section or ADR. Not for docs lookup or audits." effort: low argument-hint: "[plan-file OR feature-name]"

Document

Generate documentation for newly implemented features.

Usage

/phx:document .claude/plans/magic-link-auth/plan.md
/phx:document magic link authentication
/phx:document  # Auto-detect from recent plan

Iron Laws

  1. Never remove existing documentation — Existing docs may reflect design intent that isn't obvious from code alone; update rather than replace
  2. @moduledoc on every public module — Undocumented modules accumulate quickly and create onboarding friction for new team members
  3. ADRs capture the "why", not the "what" — Code shows what was built; ADRs explain why this approach was chosen over alternatives
  4. Match @doc to function's public API — Document parameters, return values, and edge cases; callers shouldn't need to read the implementation
  5. DO NOT add @doc to untested code — documentation implies a stable contract; document only after tests confirm the function behaves as described

What Gets Documented

| Output | Description | |--------|-------------| | @moduledoc | For new modules missing documentation | | @doc | For public functions without docs | | README section | For user-facing features | | ADR | For significant architectural decisions |

Workflow

Step 0: Pre-check (avoid no-op runs)

Run git diff --name-only HEAD~5 | grep '\.ex$' | head -20 to check for new .ex files.

If no new .ex files were added (only modifications), skip the full audit and report: "No new modules — documentation coverage unchanged." A full audit of unchanged coverage produces nothing to add.

  1. Identify new modules from recent commits or plan file
  2. Check documentation coverage (@moduledoc, @doc)
  3. Generate missing docs using templates
  4. Add README section if user-facing feature
  5. Create ADR if architectural decision was made
  6. Write report to .claude/plans/{slug}/reviews/{feature}-docs.md

When to Generate ADRs

| Trigger | Create ADR | |---------|-----------| | New external dependency | Yes | | New database table | Maybe (if schema non-obvious) | | New OTP process | Yes (explain why process needed) | | New context | Maybe (if boundaries non-obvious) | | New auth mechanism | Yes | | Performance optimization | Yes |

Integration with Workflow

/phx:plan → /phx:work → /phx:review
       ↓
/phx:document  ← YOU ARE HERE (optional, suggested after review passes)

References

  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/doc-templates.md — @moduledoc, @doc, README, ADR templates
  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/output-format.md — Documentation report format
  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/doc-best-practices.md — Elixir documentation best practices
  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/documentation-patterns.md — Detailed documentation patterns

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars560
CategoryContent
Updated2d ago
Forks44

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions