cloud-solution-architect
Transform the agent into a Cloud Solution Architect following Azure Architecture Center best practices
Install / Use
npx skills add microsoft/skills --skill cloud-solution-architectInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
SKILL.md
Installable skill definition
Quality Score
Category
Development & EngineeringSupported Platforms
Our assessment of cloud-solution-architect
cloud-solution-architect scores 90/100 on our quality scale, 987th of 3,841 Development & Engineering skills we index (top 26%).
Its SKILL.md is 17 KB long, well organised into 34 sections with 2 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.
With 3,051 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.
Maintenance, license and trust
- The repository was last updated 6 days ago, so cloud-solution-architect is actively maintained.
- It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
- Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
Safety scan
No issues foundOur scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands.
Automated pattern scan on 2026-09-30. It catches known dangerous patterns, not every risk — read a skill before letting an agent act on it.
cloud-solution-architect compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than cloud-solution-architect; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| cloud-solution-architect (this skill)by microsoft | 90 | 3.1k | 6d ago | SKILL.md |
| ai-job-searchby MadsLorentzen | 100 | 44.5k | today | CLAUDE.md |
| claude-howtoby luongnv89 | 100 | 41.7k | 3d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| algorithmic-artby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 7d ago | SKILL.md |
| pptxby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 7d ago | SKILL.md |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install cloud-solution-architect?
- Run
npx skills add microsoft/skills --skill cloud-solution-architect. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does cloud-solution-architect work with?
- It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is cloud-solution-architect safe to use?
- Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is cloud-solution-architect still maintained?
- The repository was last updated 6 days ago, so cloud-solution-architect is actively maintained.
Skill content
View source on GitHubname: cloud-solution-architect description: >- Transform the agent into a Cloud Solution Architect following Azure Architecture Center best practices. Use when designing cloud architectures, reviewing system designs, selecting architecture styles, applying cloud design patterns, making technology choices, or conducting Well-Architected Framework reviews.
Cloud Solution Architect
Overview
Design well-architected, production-grade cloud systems following Azure Architecture Center best practices. This skill provides:
- 10 design principles for Azure applications
- 6 architecture styles with selection guidance
- 44 cloud design patterns mapped to WAF pillars
- Technology choice frameworks for compute, storage, data, messaging
- Performance antipatterns to avoid
- Architecture review workflow for systematic design validation
Ten Design Principles for Azure Applications
| # | Principle | Key Tactics | |---|-----------|-------------| | 1 | Design for self-healing | Retry with backoff, circuit breaker, bulkhead isolation, health endpoint monitoring, graceful degradation | | 2 | Make all things redundant | Eliminate single points of failure, use availability zones, deploy multi-region, replicate data | | 3 | Minimize coordination | Decouple services, use async messaging, embrace eventual consistency, use domain events | | 4 | Design to scale out | Horizontal scaling, autoscaling rules, stateless services, avoid session stickiness, partition workloads | | 5 | Partition around limits | Data partitioning (shard/hash/range), respect compute & network limits, use CDNs for static content | | 6 | Design for operations | Structured logging, distributed tracing, metrics & dashboards, runbook automation, infrastructure as code | | 7 | Use managed services | Prefer PaaS over IaaS, reduce operational burden, leverage built-in HA/DR/scaling | | 8 | Use an identity service | Microsoft Entra ID, managed identity, RBAC, avoid storing credentials, zero-trust principles | | 9 | Design for evolution | Loose coupling, versioned APIs, backward compatibility, async messaging for integration, feature flags | | 10 | Build for business needs | Define SLAs/SLOs, establish RTO/RPO targets, domain-driven design, cost modeling, composite SLAs |
Architecture Styles
| Style | Description | When to Use | Key Services | |-------|-------------|-------------|--------------| | N-tier | Horizontal layers (presentation, business, data) | Traditional enterprise apps, lift-and-shift | App Service, SQL Database, VNets | | Web-Queue-Worker | Web frontend → message queue → backend worker | Moderate-complexity apps with long-running tasks | App Service, Service Bus, Functions | | Microservices | Small autonomous services, bounded contexts, independent deploy | Complex domains, independent team scaling | AKS, Container Apps, API Management | | Event-driven | Pub/sub model, event producers/consumers | Real-time processing, IoT, reactive systems | Event Hubs, Event Grid, Functions | | Big data | Batch + stream processing pipeline | Analytics, ML pipelines, large-scale data | Synapse, Data Factory, Databricks | | Big compute | HPC, parallel processing | Simulations, modeling, rendering, genomics | Batch, CycleCloud, HPC VMs |
Selection Criteria
- Domain complexity → Microservices (high), N-tier (low-medium)
- Team autonomy → Microservices (independent teams), N-tier (single team)
- Data volume → Big data (TB+), others (GB)
- Latency requirements → Event-driven (real-time), Web-Queue-Worker (tolerant)
Cloud Design Patterns
44 patterns organized by primary concern. WAF pillar mapping: R=Reliability, S=Security, CO=Cost Optimization, OE=Operational Excellence, PE=Performance Efficiency.
Messaging & Communication
| Pattern | Summary | Pillars | |---------|---------|---------| | Asynchronous Request-Reply | Decouple request/response with polling or callbacks | R, PE | | Claim Check | Split large messages; store payload separately, pass reference | R, PE | | Choreography | Services coordinate via events without central orchestrator | R, OE | | Competing Consumers | Multiple consumers process messages from shared queue concurrently | R, PE | | Messaging Bridge | Connect incompatible messaging systems | R, OE | | Pipes and Filters | Decompose complex processing into reusable filter stages | R, OE | | Priority Queue | Prioritize requests so higher-priority work is processed first | R, PE | | Publisher/Subscriber | Decouple senders from receivers via topics/subscriptions | R, PE | | Queue-Based Load Leveling | Buffer requests with a queue to smooth intermittent loads | R, PE | | Sequential Convoy | Process related messages in order while allowing parallel groups | R, PE |
Reliability & Resilience
| Pattern | Summary | Pillars | |---------|---------|---------| | Bulkhead | Isolate resources per workload to prevent cascading failure | R | | Circuit Breaker | Stop calling a failing service; fail fast to protect resources | R | | Compensating Transaction | Undo previously committed steps when a later step fails | R | | Health Endpoint Monitoring | Expose health checks for load balancers and orchestrators | R, OE | | Leader Election | Coordinate distributed instances by electing a leader | R | | Retry | Handle transient faults by retrying with exponential backoff | R | | Saga | Manage data consistency across microservices with compensating transactions | R | | Scheduler Agent Supervisor | Coordinate distributed actions with retry and failure handling | R |
Data Management
| Pattern | Summary | Pillars | |---------|---------|---------| | Cache-Aside | Load data on demand into cache from data store | PE | | CQRS | Separate read and write models for independent scaling | PE, R | | Event Sourcing | Store state as append-only sequence of domain events | R, OE | | Index Table | Create indexes over frequently queried fields in data stores | PE | | Materialized View | Pre-compute views over data for efficient queries | PE | | Sharding | Distribute data across partitions for scale and performance | PE, R | | Static Content Hosting | Serve static content from cloud storage/CDN directly | PE, CO | | Valet Key | Grant clients limited direct access to storage resources | S, PE |
Design & Structure
| Pattern | Summary | Pillars | |---------|---------|---------| | Ambassador | Offload cross-cutting concerns to a helper sidecar proxy | OE | | Anti-Corruption Layer | Translate between new and legacy system models | OE, R | | Backends for Frontends | Create separate backends per frontend type (mobile, web, etc.) | OE, PE | | Compute Resource Consolidation | Combine multiple workloads into fewer compute instances | CO | | External Configuration Store | Externalize configuration from deployment packages | OE | | Sidecar | Deploy helper components alongside the main service | OE | | Strangler Fig | Incrementally migrate legacy systems by replacing pieces | OE, R |
Security & Access
| Pattern | Summary | Pillars | |---------|---------|---------| | Federated Identity | Delegate authentication to an external identity provider | S | | Gatekeeper | Protect services using a dedicated broker that validates requests | S | | Quarantine | Isolate and validate external assets before allowing use | S | | Rate Limiting | Control consumption rate of resources by consumers | R, S | | Throttling | Control resource consumption to sustain SLAs under load | R, PE |
Deployment & Scaling
| Pattern | Summary | Pillars | |---------|---------|---------| | Deployment Stamps | Deploy multiple independent copies of application components | R, PE | | Edge Workload Configuration | Configure workloads differently across diverse edge devices | OE | | Gateway Aggregation | Aggregate multiple backend calls into a single client request | PE | | Gateway Offloading | Offload shared functionality (SSL, auth) to a gateway | OE, S | | Gateway Routing | Route requests to multiple backends using a single endpoint | OE | | Geode | Deploy backends to multiple regions for active-active serving | R, PE |
See Design Patterns Reference for detailed implementation guidance.
Technology Choices
Decision Framework
For each technology area, evaluate: requirements → constraints → tradeoffs → select.
| Area | Key Options | Selection Criteria | |------|-------------|-------------------| | Compute | App Service, Functions, Container Apps, AKS, VMs, Batch | Hosting model, scaling, cost, team skills | | Storage | Blob Storage, Data Lake, Files, Disks, Managed Lustre | Access patterns, throughput, cost tier | | Data stores | SQL Database, Cosmos DB, PostgreSQL, Redis, Table Storage | Consistency model, query patterns, scale | | Messaging | Service Bus, Event Hubs, Event Grid, Queue Storage | Ordering, throughput, pub/sub vs queue | | Networking | Front Door, Application Gateway, Load Balancer, Traffic Manager | Global vs regional, L4 vs L7, WAF | | AI services | Azure OpenAI, AI Search, AI Foundry, Document Intelligence | Model needs, data grounding, orchestration | | Containers | Container Apps, AKS, Container Instances | Operational control vs simplicity |
See Technology Choices Reference for detailed decision trees.
Best Practices
| Practice | Key Guidance | |----------|-------------| | API design | RESTful conventions, resource-oriented URIs, HATEOAS, versioning via URL path or header | | API implementation | Async operations, pagination, idempotent PUT/DELETE, content negotiation, ETag caching | | Autoscaling | Scale on metrics (CPU, queue depth, custom), cool-down periods, predictive scaling, scale-in protection | | Background jobs | Use queues or scheduled triggers, idempotent processing, poison message handling, graceful shutdown | | Caching | Cache-aside pattern, TTL policies, cache invalidation strategies, distributed cache for multi-instance | | CDN | Static asset offloading, cache-busting with versioned URLs, geo-distribution, HTTPS enforcement | | Data partitioning | Horizontal (sharding), vertical, functional partitioning; partition key selection for even distribution | | Partitioning strategies | Hash-based, range-based, directory-based; rebalancing approach, cross-partition query avoidance | | Host name preservation | Preserve original host header through proxies/gateways for cookies, redirects, auth flows | | Message encoding | Schema evolution (Avro/Protobuf), backward/forward compatibility, schema registry | | Monitoring & diagnostics | Structured logging, distributed tracing (W3C Trace Context), metrics, alerts, dashboards | | Transient fault handling | Retry with exponential backoff + jitter, circuit breaker, idempotency keys, timeout budgets |
See Best Practices Reference for implementation details.
Performance Antipatterns
Avoid these common patterns that degrade performance under load:
| Antipattern | Problem | Fix | |-------------|---------|-----| | Busy Database | Offloading too much processing to the database | Move logic to application tier, use caching | | Busy Front End | Resource-intensive work on frontend request threads | Offload to background workers/queues | | Chatty I/O | Many small I/O requests instead of fewer large ones | Batch requests, use bulk APIs, buffer writes | | Extraneous Fetching | Retrieving more data than needed | Project only required fields, paginate, filter server-side | | Improper Instantiation | Recreating expensive objects per reques
Truncated for display — read the full file on GitHub.
Related Skills
ai-job-search
44.5kThe job search that runs on your machine. AI job application framework built on Claude Code: evaluate postings, tailor CVs, write cover letters, prep interviews. Fork it and own it.
claude-howto
41.7kA visual, example-driven guide to Claude Code — from basic concepts to advanced agents, with copy-paste templates that bring immediate value.
algorithmic-art
177.9kCreating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems.
pptx
177.9kUse this skill any time a .pptx or .potx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx or .potx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an em…
Languages
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
