SkillAgentSearch skills...

abridge-upgrade-migration

Plan a reversible Abridge tenant, care-setting, note-template, or EHR workflow change from authoritative release evidence

Install / Use

npx skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill abridge-upgrade-migration

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

87/100

Category

Automation

Supported Platforms

Claude Code

Our assessment of abridge-upgrade-migration

abridge-upgrade-migration scores 87/100 on our quality scale, 1232nd of 2,250 Automation skills we index.

Its SKILL.md is 4.7 KB long, well organised into 13 sections with 1 code example: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.

With 2,785 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
26/30
Structure
17/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
15/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 5 days ago, so abridge-upgrade-migration is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

abridge-upgrade-migration compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than abridge-upgrade-migration; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
abridge-upgrade-migration (this skill)by jeremylongshore872.8k5d agoSKILL.md
Agent-Reachby Panniantong10086.1k14d agoCLAUDE.md
rufloby ruvnet10073.5ktodayCLAUDE.md
Scraplingby D4Vinci10084.5ktodayMCP Server
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k7d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install abridge-upgrade-migration?
Run npx skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill abridge-upgrade-migration. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does abridge-upgrade-migration work with?
It is written for Claude Code, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is abridge-upgrade-migration safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is abridge-upgrade-migration still maintained?
The repository was last updated 5 days ago, so abridge-upgrade-migration is actively maintained.

name: abridge-upgrade-migration description: "Plan a reversible Abridge tenant, care-setting, note-template, or EHR workflow change from authoritative release evidence. Use when migrating an Abridge implementation. Trigger with "plan the Abridge migration"." argument-hint: "[change-type] [source-state] [target-state]" allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, WebFetch, Write, Edit version: 1.5.0 author: Jeremy Longshore jeremy@intentsolutions.io license: MIT tags:

  • saas
  • abridge
  • migration
  • change-control
  • rollback model: inherit effort: high compatibility: Designed for Claude Code; live work requires an authorized Abridge tenant, approved test data, and health-system change authority

Abridge Tenant and EHR Change Migration

Overview

Treat every material workflow change as a clinical and EHR migration, not a generic API-version bump. Pin source and target behavior, identify affected cohorts and templates, test with designated records, and preserve a workable rollback.

Prerequisites

  • The authorized Abridge environment, clinical owner, and health-system policy set
  • Current tenant-specific implementation evidence for every private interface in scope
  • Synthetic data or the organization's formally approved test-record procedure

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect repository configuration, adapters, tests, policies, and existing evidence. Use WebFetch only for current official Abridge, HHS, or named EHR documentation. Use Write or Edit only after confirming scope, environment, owners, patient-data boundary, and approval state. These tools do not confer access to Abridge, an EHR, or a clinical record; return exact operator steps or an approval-gated handoff for live actions.

Current Contract

  • Abridge capabilities differ across outpatient, emergency, inpatient, orders, note types, and integration modes.
  • Note-setting changes can affect future notes without retroactively changing prior notes.
  • Public announcements describe capability direction; the tenant's approved release and implementation documents control availability.

Authentication

Use only the health system's provisioned Abridge application access, SSO, administrative role, or tenant-specific partner authentication documented for the approved environment. Do not infer public API credentials, reuse production secrets in tests, or expose tokens and session material. Verify identity owner, least privilege, environment binding, storage, rotation, and revocation before any authenticated action.

Instructions

  1. Freeze source and target tenant states, release evidence, care settings, cohorts, note types, EHR templates, owners, and maintenance window.
  2. Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inventory configuration, mappings, training, tests, dashboards, and downstream dependencies.
  3. Classify changes by patient-selection, capture, generation, review, evidence, note-template, EHR handoff, access, and support impact.
  4. Test source and target side by side with approved test records; include rollback, partial migration, and in-flight encounter cases.
  5. Use WebFetch only for current official product context; require tenant release notes for actual change semantics.
  6. Use Write or Edit to publish the migration map, evidence, communications, cutover checks, and rollback authority.

Approval Boundaries

Do not cut over active clinical cohorts, change shared templates, or assume a newly announced feature is licensed and enabled without owner confirmation.

Output

Return source and target states, affected assets, test evidence, in-flight handling, training, cutover steps, rollback trigger, and decision owners. Separate verified facts, tenant-specific evidence, assumptions, and actions still awaiting approval.

Error Handling

| Condition | Response | |---|---| | Target behavior is not documented for the tenant | Delay migration. | | Prior note behavior is assumed to change | Separate prospective settings from historical content. | | Rollback changes patient workflow | Rehearse and communicate it before cutover. |

Example

The example is a redacted operational receipt, not patient data or proof of vendor certification.

change=inpatient-note-type; cohort=pilot; source=approved-r4; target=approved-r5; test-records=8; rollback=pass; decision=scheduled

Resources

Read the source map before changing a workflow. Recheck tenant-specific implementation evidence for every interface or capability that public documentation does not define.

Next Steps

Revalidate the evidence date and tenant-specific authority before repeating this workflow in another environment, cohort, care setting, or integration mode.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars2.8k
CategoryAutomation
Updated5d ago
Forks404

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions