SkillAgentSearch skills...

abridge-sdk-patterns

Implement a narrow customer-owned adapter around an approved Abridge tenant interface without claiming a public SDK

Install / Use

npx skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill abridge-sdk-patterns

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

84/100

Category

Legal

Supported Platforms

Claude Code

Our assessment of abridge-sdk-patterns

abridge-sdk-patterns scores 84/100 on our quality scale, 98th of 163 Legal skills we index.

Its SKILL.md is 4.7 KB long, well organised into 13 sections with 1 code example: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.

With 2,785 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
26/30
Structure
17/20
Description
12/15
Adoption
15/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 6 days ago, so abridge-sdk-patterns is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

abridge-sdk-patterns compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than abridge-sdk-patterns; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
abridge-sdk-patterns (this skill)by jeremylongshore842.8k6d agoSKILL.md
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k7d agoSKILL.md
pptxby anthropics100177.9k7d agoSKILL.md
designby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k9d agoSKILL.md
ui-ux-pro-maxby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k9d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install abridge-sdk-patterns?
Run npx skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill abridge-sdk-patterns. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does abridge-sdk-patterns work with?
It is written for Claude Code, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is abridge-sdk-patterns safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is abridge-sdk-patterns still maintained?
The repository was last updated 6 days ago, so abridge-sdk-patterns is actively maintained.

name: abridge-sdk-patterns description: "Implement a narrow customer-owned adapter around an approved Abridge tenant interface without claiming a public SDK. Use when coding against vendor-issued integration specifications. Trigger with "build the Abridge adapter"." argument-hint: "[interface-contract] [language]" allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, WebFetch, Write, Edit version: 1.5.0 author: Jeremy Longshore jeremy@intentsolutions.io license: MIT tags:

  • saas
  • abridge
  • adapter
  • private-contract
  • reliability model: inherit effort: high compatibility: Designed for Claude Code; live work requires an authorized Abridge tenant, approved test data, and health-system change authority

Abridge Private-Contract Adapter Patterns

Overview

Keep vendor-specific transport behind a typed port whose schema, authentication, errors, timeouts, and retry rules are pinned to the private contract revision. Make unsupported behavior fail closed and keep clinical review outside the adapter.

Prerequisites

  • The authorized Abridge environment, clinical owner, and health-system policy set
  • Current tenant-specific implementation evidence for every private interface in scope
  • Synthetic data or the organization's formally approved test-record procedure

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect repository configuration, adapters, tests, policies, and existing evidence. Use WebFetch only for current official Abridge, HHS, or named EHR documentation. Use Write or Edit only after confirming scope, environment, owners, patient-data boundary, and approval state. These tools do not confer access to Abridge, an EHR, or a clinical record; return exact operator steps or an approval-gated handoff for live actions.

Current Contract

  • The cited public Abridge sources describe product workflows, not a general public SDK package or stable REST surface.
  • Partner-issued specifications may be implemented only for the authorized tenant and cannot be generalized without evidence.
  • Clinical content, credentials, and tenant identifiers must not appear in logs or test fixtures.

Authentication

Use only the health system's provisioned Abridge application access, SSO, administrative role, or tenant-specific partner authentication documented for the approved environment. Do not infer public API credentials, reuse production secrets in tests, or expose tokens and session material. Verify identity owner, least privilege, environment binding, storage, rotation, and revocation before any authenticated action.

Instructions

  1. Verify the contract owner, revision, environment, authentication protocol, schemas, delivery semantics, and support path.
  2. Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect existing ports, adapters, configuration, error types, and tests.
  3. Define typed request and response envelopes with strict parsing, explicit unknown-field behavior, redacted errors, and bounded timeouts.
  4. Implement retries only for contract-authorized idempotent operations; expose manual reconciliation for ambiguous outcomes.
  5. Use Write or Edit to add the adapter, synthetic contract fixtures, version negotiation, and rollback path.
  6. Use WebFetch only to align user-facing workflow language with official Abridge guidance.

Approval Boundaries

Do not guess endpoints, credentials, headers, scopes, event names, or response fields. Do not publish private contract material in the repository.

Output

Return contract revision, implemented operations, auth boundary, parser policy, retry classes, test coverage, logging exclusions, and unsupported operations. Separate verified facts, tenant-specific evidence, assumptions, and actions still awaiting approval.

Error Handling

| Condition | Response | |---|---| | Contract revision is missing | Refuse implementation. | | Response violates schema | Quarantine the payload metadata and escalate without logging content. | | Outcome is ambiguous | Do not retry a possible clinical write automatically. |

Example

The example is a redacted operational receipt, not patient data or proof of vendor certification.

contract=vendor-ICD-r9; operations=3; fixtures=synthetic; unknown-fields=reject; retries=idempotent-only; private-docs-committed=no

Resources

Read the source map before changing a workflow. Recheck tenant-specific implementation evidence for every interface or capability that public documentation does not define.

Next Steps

Revalidate the evidence date and tenant-specific authority before repeating this workflow in another environment, cohort, care setting, or integration mode.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars2.8k
CategoryLegal
Updated6d ago
Forks404

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions