SkillAgentSearch skills...

abridge-reference-architecture

Define an Abridge reference architecture that separates vendor, EHR, identity, device, customer, and clinical authority boundaries

Install / Use

npx skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill abridge-reference-architecture

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

87/100

Supported Platforms

Claude Code

Our assessment of abridge-reference-architecture

abridge-reference-architecture scores 87/100 on our quality scale, 17th of 42 Healthcare & Life Sciences skills we index (top 41%).

Its SKILL.md is 4.7 KB long, well organised into 13 sections with 1 code example: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.

With 2,785 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
26/30
Structure
17/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
15/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 5 days ago, so abridge-reference-architecture is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

abridge-reference-architecture compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than abridge-reference-architecture; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
abridge-reference-architecture (this skill)by jeremylongshore872.8k5d agoSKILL.md
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k7d agoSKILL.md
pptxby anthropics100177.9k7d agoSKILL.md
designby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k8d agoSKILL.md
ui-ux-pro-maxby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k8d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install abridge-reference-architecture?
Run npx skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill abridge-reference-architecture. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does abridge-reference-architecture work with?
It is written for Claude Code, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is abridge-reference-architecture safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is abridge-reference-architecture still maintained?
The repository was last updated 5 days ago, so abridge-reference-architecture is actively maintained.

name: abridge-reference-architecture description: "Define an Abridge reference architecture that separates vendor, EHR, identity, device, customer, and clinical authority boundaries. Use when reviewing an enterprise Abridge design. Trigger with "design the Abridge architecture"." argument-hint: "[care-settings] [ehr-landscape]" allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, WebFetch, Write, Edit version: 1.5.0 author: Jeremy Longshore jeremy@intentsolutions.io license: MIT tags:

  • saas
  • abridge
  • architecture
  • ehr
  • governance model: inherit effort: high compatibility: Designed for Claude Code; live work requires an authorized Abridge tenant, approved test data, and health-system change authority

Abridge Health-System Integration Architecture

Overview

Produce a tenant-grounded component and trust-boundary model for clinician capture, Abridge processing, review, Linked Evidence, EHR handoff, identity, support, telemetry, and downtime. Show unknown private interfaces explicitly instead of filling them with generic REST or FHIR assumptions.

Prerequisites

  • The authorized Abridge environment, clinical owner, and health-system policy set
  • Current tenant-specific implementation evidence for every private interface in scope
  • Synthetic data or the organization's formally approved test-record procedure

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect repository configuration, adapters, tests, policies, and existing evidence. Use WebFetch only for current official Abridge, HHS, or named EHR documentation. Use Write or Edit only after confirming scope, environment, owners, patient-data boundary, and approval state. These tools do not confer access to Abridge, an EHR, or a clinical record; return exact operator steps or an approval-gated handoff for live actions.

Current Contract

  • Abridge publicly documents application and Epic-integrated user workflows across multiple care settings.
  • Linked Evidence supports review by relating generated text to source material.
  • Exact data flows, retention, interfaces, identity protocols, and EHR mappings require tenant and vendor evidence.

Authentication

Use only the health system's provisioned Abridge application access, SSO, administrative role, or tenant-specific partner authentication documented for the approved environment. Do not infer public API credentials, reuse production secrets in tests, or expose tokens and session material. Verify identity owner, least privilege, environment binding, storage, rotation, and revocation before any authenticated action.

Instructions

  1. Inventory actors, care settings, devices, Abridge tenant capabilities, EHR modules, identity systems, networks, support channels, and owners.
  2. Use Read, Glob, and Grep to locate interface control documents, data-flow diagrams, retention decisions, and threat models.
  3. Draw data and control flows with classification, system of record, trust boundary, authorization, retention, and failure owner on each edge.
  4. Model consent, wrong-patient prevention, clinician review, downtime, rollback, and protected support evidence as first-class paths.
  5. Use WebFetch only for current official Abridge product context and label all tenant-specific facts by source revision.
  6. Use Write or Edit to update the architecture record and unresolved evidence register.

Approval Boundaries

Do not label an inferred interface, FHIR resource, webhook, hosting model, or retention period as implemented without authoritative evidence.

Output

Return component map, flows, trust boundaries, data classes, systems of record, owners, failure paths, evidence revisions, and open assumptions. Separate verified facts, tenant-specific evidence, assumptions, and actions still awaiting approval.

Error Handling

| Condition | Response | |---|---| | Edge lacks an owner | Keep the design unapproved. | | PHI crosses an undocumented boundary | Stop and escalate to privacy and security review. | | Diagram conflicts with tenant evidence | Update the diagram and record the superseded assumption. |

Example

The example is a redacted operational receipt, not patient data or proof of vendor certification.

settings=outpatient+ed; ehr=epic; boundaries=7; undocumented-edges=2; phi-flows=owner-reviewed; status=design-review

Resources

Read the source map before changing a workflow. Recheck tenant-specific implementation evidence for every interface or capability that public documentation does not define.

Next Steps

Revalidate the evidence date and tenant-specific authority before repeating this workflow in another environment, cohort, care setting, or integration mode.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars2.8k
CategoryHealthcare
Updated5d ago
Forks404

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions