SkillAgentSearch skills...

abridge-local-dev-loop

Build a local synthetic rehearsal for customer-owned Abridge workflow adapters and failure states

Install / Use

npx skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill abridge-local-dev-loop

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

84/100

Category

Automation

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of abridge-local-dev-loop

abridge-local-dev-loop scores 84/100 on our quality scale, 1574th of 2,607 Automation skills we index.

Its SKILL.md is 4.6 KB long, well organised into 13 sections with 1 code example: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.

With 2,785 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
26/30
Structure
17/20
Description
12/15
Adoption
15/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 6 days ago, so abridge-local-dev-loop is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

abridge-local-dev-loop compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than abridge-local-dev-loop; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
abridge-local-dev-loop (this skill)by jeremylongshore842.8k6d agoSKILL.md
Agent-Reachby Panniantong10086.3k14d agoCLAUDE.md
rufloby ruvnet10073.6ktodayCLAUDE.md
Scraplingby D4Vinci10084.6ktodayMCP Server
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k7d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install abridge-local-dev-loop?
Run npx skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill abridge-local-dev-loop. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does abridge-local-dev-loop work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is abridge-local-dev-loop safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is abridge-local-dev-loop still maintained?
The repository was last updated 6 days ago, so abridge-local-dev-loop is actively maintained.

name: abridge-local-dev-loop description: "Build a local synthetic rehearsal for customer-owned Abridge workflow adapters and failure states. Use when developing integration code without access to patient data or a documented public Abridge sandbox. Trigger with "create an Abridge dev loop"." argument-hint: "[repository] [workflow-boundary]" allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, WebFetch, Write, Edit version: 1.5.0 author: Jeremy Longshore jeremy@intentsolutions.io license: MIT tags:

  • saas
  • abridge
  • local-development
  • synthetic-data
  • fixtures model: inherit effort: high compatibility: Designed for Claude Code; live work requires an authorized Abridge tenant, approved test data, and health-system change authority

Abridge Synthetic Workflow Rehearsal

Overview

Model the approved interface control document locally with synthetic fixtures, deterministic state transitions, and zero vendor calls. Keep the harness useful even when tenant-specific schemas change by pinning each fixture to its authority revision.

Prerequisites

  • The authorized Abridge environment, clinical owner, and health-system policy set
  • Current tenant-specific implementation evidence for every private interface in scope
  • Synthetic data or the organization's formally approved test-record procedure

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect repository configuration, adapters, tests, policies, and existing evidence. Use WebFetch only for current official Abridge, HHS, or named EHR documentation. Use Write or Edit only after confirming scope, environment, owners, patient-data boundary, and approval state. These tools do not confer access to Abridge, an EHR, or a clinical record; return exact operator steps or an approval-gated handoff for live actions.

Current Contract

  • Abridge public support materials describe the human workflow but do not promise a universal public developer sandbox.
  • A local EHR simulator or mock adapter tests customer code only; it does not reproduce Abridge, Epic, or clinical behavior.
  • Synthetic dialogue must avoid copied patient phrases and realistic identifiers.

Authentication

Use only the health system's provisioned Abridge application access, SSO, administrative role, or tenant-specific partner authentication documented for the approved environment. Do not infer public API credentials, reuse production secrets in tests, or expose tokens and session material. Verify identity owner, least privilege, environment binding, storage, rotation, and revocation before any authenticated action.

Instructions

  1. Freeze the customer-owned boundary, private contract revision, permitted fields, and expected state transitions.
  2. Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect adapters and tests, then identify every external call that must be mocked.
  3. Create obviously synthetic fixtures for consent state, encounter selection, draft metadata, review state, and handoff result.
  4. Add deterministic failures for timeout, duplicate delivery, stale revision, wrong tenant, unreviewed draft, and redaction rejection.
  5. Use Write or Edit to implement the harness and record its non-equivalence to live systems.
  6. Use WebFetch only to keep the modeled user journey aligned with official Abridge guidance.

Approval Boundaries

Do not proxy a live tenant, download production payloads, or label a local mock as vendor certification.

Output

Return modeled boundary, fixture classes, authority revision, state coverage, failure coverage, live-call count, and known simulation gaps. Separate verified facts, tenant-specific evidence, assumptions, and actions still awaiting approval.

Error Handling

| Condition | Response | |---|---| | Fixture provenance is unknown | Delete and recreate it from synthetic requirements. | | Test performs a network call | Fail closed and replace it with a mock. | | Private schema changed | Version the new fixture and retain migration coverage. |

Example

The example is a redacted operational receipt, not patient data or proof of vendor certification.

boundary=review-state-adapter; fixtures=7-synthetic; failures=6; network-calls=0; authority=ICD-r12; certification-claim=none

Resources

Read the source map before changing a workflow. Recheck tenant-specific implementation evidence for every interface or capability that public documentation does not define.

Next Steps

Revalidate the evidence date and tenant-specific authority before repeating this workflow in another environment, cohort, care setting, or integration mode.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars2.8k
CategoryAutomation
Updated6d ago
Forks404

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions