SkillAgentSearch skills...

abridge-debug-bundle

Produce a PHI-minimized Abridge support bundle with provenance, redaction, and protected escalation boundaries

Install / Use

npx skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill abridge-debug-bundle

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

84/100

Supported Platforms

Claude Code
Zed

Our assessment of abridge-debug-bundle

abridge-debug-bundle scores 84/100 on our quality scale, 193rd of 267 Customer Support skills we index.

Its SKILL.md is 4.7 KB long, well organised into 13 sections with 1 code example: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.

With 2,785 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
26/30
Structure
17/20
Description
12/15
Adoption
15/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 6 days ago, so abridge-debug-bundle is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

abridge-debug-bundle compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than abridge-debug-bundle; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
abridge-debug-bundle (this skill)by jeremylongshore842.8k6d agoSKILL.md
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k7d agoSKILL.md
pptxby anthropics100177.9k7d agoSKILL.md
designby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k9d agoSKILL.md
ui-ux-pro-maxby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k9d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install abridge-debug-bundle?
Run npx skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill abridge-debug-bundle. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does abridge-debug-bundle work with?
It is written for Claude Code and Zed, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is abridge-debug-bundle safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is abridge-debug-bundle still maintained?
The repository was last updated 6 days ago, so abridge-debug-bundle is actively maintained.

name: abridge-debug-bundle description: "Produce a PHI-minimized Abridge support bundle with provenance, redaction, and protected escalation boundaries. Use when support needs reproducible evidence for an Abridge issue. Trigger with "build an Abridge debug bundle"." argument-hint: "[incident-id] [time-window]" allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, WebFetch, Write, Edit version: 1.5.0 author: Jeremy Longshore jeremy@intentsolutions.io license: MIT tags:

  • saas
  • abridge
  • diagnostics
  • privacy
  • support-bundle model: inherit effort: high compatibility: Designed for Claude Code; live work requires an authorized Abridge tenant, approved test data, and health-system change authority

Abridge Minimum-Necessary Support Bundle

Overview

Collect configuration presence, component versions, coarse timestamps, correlation references, and observed outcomes without copying recordings, transcripts, generated notes, patient identifiers, tokens, or unrestricted logs.

Prerequisites

  • The authorized Abridge environment, clinical owner, and health-system policy set
  • Current tenant-specific implementation evidence for every private interface in scope
  • Synthetic data or the organization's formally approved test-record procedure

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect repository configuration, adapters, tests, policies, and existing evidence. Use WebFetch only for current official Abridge, HHS, or named EHR documentation. Use Write or Edit only after confirming scope, environment, owners, patient-data boundary, and approval state. These tools do not confer access to Abridge, an EHR, or a clinical record; return exact operator steps or an approval-gated handoff for live actions.

Current Contract

  • Abridge describes secure data handling and provides a protected support route, but public support content does not authorize exporting clinical content into ordinary tickets.
  • HIPAA's minimum-necessary principle should shape diagnostic collection and access.
  • A redacted value can still be identifying when combined with exact timestamps, user IDs, or rare workflow details.

Authentication

Use only the health system's provisioned Abridge application access, SSO, administrative role, or tenant-specific partner authentication documented for the approved environment. Do not infer public API credentials, reuse production secrets in tests, or expose tokens and session material. Verify identity owner, least privilege, environment binding, storage, rotation, and revocation before any authenticated action.

Instructions

  1. Define the incident, recipient, protected channel, retention period, and exact evidence questions before collection.
  2. Use Read, Glob, and Grep to locate approved logs and configuration names; do not recursively collect an application directory.
  3. Allowlist fields such as component version, environment label, coarse time bucket, outcome class, and opaque support correlation reference.
  4. Reject audio, transcript, note text, patient or clinician identifiers, URLs with query data, secrets, cookies, and authorization headers.
  5. Use Write or Edit to create the bounded bundle and a manifest; have a second reviewer attest to the redaction.
  6. Use WebFetch only to confirm current official Abridge security and support guidance before transfer.

Approval Boundaries

Do not attach a bundle to email, chat, or a public issue unless the privacy and security owners approve that channel and the bundle passes review.

Output

Return manifest, source classes, allowlisted fields, redaction counts, reviewer, destination, expiry, and excluded evidence classes. Separate verified facts, tenant-specific evidence, assumptions, and actions still awaiting approval.

Error Handling

| Condition | Response | |---|---| | Sensitive value cannot be classified | Exclude it by default. | | Recipient requests raw logs | Move to the approved protected disclosure process. | | Bundle cannot reproduce the symptom | Document the limitation; do not broaden collection silently. |

Example

The example is a redacted operational receipt, not patient data or proof of vendor certification.

incident=INC-2041; window=15m-rounded; files=3; rejected-fields=17; phi=none-observed; reviewer=privacy-oncall; expiry=7d

Resources

Read the source map before changing a workflow. Recheck tenant-specific implementation evidence for every interface or capability that public documentation does not define.

Next Steps

Revalidate the evidence date and tenant-specific authority before repeating this workflow in another environment, cohort, care setting, or integration mode.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars2.8k
CategoryCustomer
Updated6d ago
Forks404

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions