abridge-common-errors
Triage Abridge recording, note-review, Epic handoff, and access failures from observed evidence without inventing vendor error codes
Install / Use
npx skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill abridge-common-errorsInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
SKILL.md
Installable skill definition
Quality Score
Category
AutomationSupported Platforms
Our assessment of abridge-common-errors
abridge-common-errors scores 87/100 on our quality scale, 1227th of 2,250 Automation skills we index.
Its SKILL.md is 4.8 KB long, well organised into 13 sections with 1 code example: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.
With 2,785 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.
Maintenance, license and trust
- The repository was last updated 5 days ago, so abridge-common-errors is actively maintained.
- It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
- Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
abridge-common-errors compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than abridge-common-errors; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| abridge-common-errors (this skill)by jeremylongshore | 87 | 2.8k | 5d ago | SKILL.md |
| Agent-Reachby Panniantong | 100 | 86.1k | 14d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| rufloby ruvnet | 100 | 73.5k | today | CLAUDE.md |
| Scraplingby D4Vinci | 100 | 84.5k | today | MCP Server |
| algorithmic-artby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 7d ago | SKILL.md |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install abridge-common-errors?
- Run
npx skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill abridge-common-errors. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does abridge-common-errors work with?
- It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is abridge-common-errors safe to use?
- It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is abridge-common-errors still maintained?
- The repository was last updated 5 days ago, so abridge-common-errors is actively maintained.
Skill content
View source on GitHubname: abridge-common-errors description: "Triage Abridge recording, note-review, Epic handoff, and access failures from observed evidence without inventing vendor error codes. Use when an Abridge clinical workflow is degraded. Trigger with "diagnose this Abridge issue"." argument-hint: "[environment] [symptom] [time-window]" allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, WebFetch, Write, Edit version: 1.5.0 author: Jeremy Longshore jeremy@intentsolutions.io license: MIT tags:
- saas
- abridge
- troubleshooting
- clinical-workflow
- support model: inherit effort: high compatibility: Designed for Claude Code; live work requires an authorized Abridge tenant, approved test data, and health-system change authority
Abridge Workflow Failure Triage
Overview
Classify the failure by user-visible stage, preserve a minimum-necessary timeline, and route it to the correct health-system, EHR, device, identity, network, or Abridge owner. Prefer observed messages and approved runbooks over generic HTTP guesses.
Prerequisites
- The authorized Abridge environment, clinical owner, and health-system policy set
- Current tenant-specific implementation evidence for every private interface in scope
- Synthetic data or the organization's formally approved test-record procedure
Tool Discipline
Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect repository configuration, adapters, tests, policies, and existing evidence. Use WebFetch only for current official Abridge, HHS, or named EHR documentation. Use Write or Edit only after confirming scope, environment, owners, patient-data boundary, and approval state. These tools do not confer access to Abridge, an EHR, or a clinical record; return exact operator steps or an approval-gated handoff for live actions.
Current Contract
- The documented workflow spans patient selection, recording, note creation, Web Editor review, and optional Epic handoff.
- Linked Evidence is a review aid that connects note text to source transcript or audio; it is not an automatic clinical approval.
- Public support pages provide user workflows, not a canonical public list of partner API status codes.
Authentication
Use only the health system's provisioned Abridge application access, SSO, administrative role, or tenant-specific partner authentication documented for the approved environment. Do not infer public API credentials, reuse production secrets in tests, or expose tokens and session material. Verify identity owner, least privilege, environment binding, storage, rotation, and revocation before any authenticated action.
Instructions
- Record the environment, affected cohort, first observed time, last known good time, and exact visible symptom.
- Use
Read,Glob, andGrepto locate the approved runbook, interface contract, recent configuration change, and feature-flag history. - Separate capture/device failures, upload or connectivity failures, note-generation delays, editor issues, and EHR handoff failures.
- Check whether the problem follows one user, device, location, specialty, note type, or EHR workflow without collecting note content.
- Use
WebFetchonly to compare the symptom with current official Abridge support guidance. - Use
WriteorEditto produce a redacted escalation receipt and update a runbook only when evidence supports the change.
Approval Boundaries
Do not replay a patient encounter, open a patient note, change an EHR template, or disable a security control solely to diagnose a failure. Escalate clinical-safety concerns immediately.
Output
Return impact, stage, evidence, likely owning boundary, safe checks completed, stop conditions, and the exact redacted artifact needed for escalation. Separate verified facts, tenant-specific evidence, assumptions, and actions still awaiting approval.
Error Handling
| Condition | Response | |---|---| | Patient content appears in evidence | Stop collection and move to the approved protected support channel. | | No exact timestamp or user-visible symptom | Request bounded evidence before assigning a cause. | | Clinical note may be unsafe | Pause downstream use and invoke the clinical-safety escalation path. |
Example
The example is a redacted operational receipt, not patient data or proof of vendor certification.
stage=epic-handoff; cohort=one-clinic; capture-and-review=healthy; owner=local-ehr-template; phi-in-receipt=no; status=escalate
Resources
- Official documentation map — dated public evidence and the limits of what those sources establish.
Read the source map before changing a workflow. Recheck tenant-specific implementation evidence for every interface or capability that public documentation does not define.
Next Steps
Revalidate the evidence date and tenant-specific authority before repeating this workflow in another environment, cohort, care setting, or integration mode.
Related Skills
Agent-Reach
86.1kGive your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Read & search Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu — one CLI, zero API fees.
ruflo
73.5k🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated
Scrapling
84.5k🕷️ An adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full-scale crawl! Don't be shy, join here: https://discord.gg/EMgGbDceNQ and follow here for daily tips and tricks: https://x.com/Scrapling_dev
algorithmic-art
177.9kCreating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems.
Languages
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
