SkillAgentSearch skills...

workflow-optimizer

Analyze workflow patterns using the Agent Monitor's workflow intelligence API — orchestration DAGs, tool flow transitions, subagent effectiveness, model delegation patterns, error propagation by depth, concurrency lanes, compaction impact, and agent co-occurrence.

Install / Use

npx skills add hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor --skill workflow-optimizer

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

81/100

Category

Automation

Supported Platforms

Claude Code
Zed

Our assessment of workflow-optimizer

workflow-optimizer scores 81/100 on our quality scale, 2348th of 2,843 Automation skills we index.

Its SKILL.md is 3.9 KB long, well organised into 12 sections and no code examples: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.

With 1,015 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
26/30
Structure
13/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
13/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 10 days ago, so workflow-optimizer is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

workflow-optimizer compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than workflow-optimizer; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
workflow-optimizer (this skill)by hoangsonww811.0k10d agoSKILL.md
Agent-Reachby Panniantong10089.8k18d agoCLAUDE.md
headroomby headroomlabs-ai10074.4ktodayCLAUDE.md
Scraplingby D4Vinci10085.5ktodayMCP Server
crawl4aiby unclecode10084.7k8d agoMCP Server

Frequently asked questions

How do I install workflow-optimizer?
Run npx skills add hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor --skill workflow-optimizer. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does workflow-optimizer work with?
It is written for Claude Code and Zed, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is workflow-optimizer safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is workflow-optimizer still maintained?
The repository was last updated 10 days ago, so workflow-optimizer is actively maintained.

name: workflow-optimizer description: > Analyze workflow patterns using the Agent Monitor's workflow intelligence API — orchestration DAGs, tool flow transitions, subagent effectiveness, model delegation patterns, error propagation by depth, concurrency lanes, compaction impact, and agent co-occurrence. Produces prioritized optimization recommendations with quantified impact.

Workflow Optimizer

Analyze Claude Code workflows using the Agent Monitor's workflow intelligence engine.

Input

The user provides: $ARGUMENTS

Options: "analyze", a session ID for single-session analysis, or a focus: "tools", "subagents", "cost", "errors".

Data Sources

| Endpoint | Returns | |----------|---------| | GET /api/sessions?limit=100 | Session list with metadata | | GET /api/workflows/{sessionId} | 11 workflow datasets (see below) | | GET /api/analytics | Tool usage top 20, event types, agent types | | GET /api/pricing | Model pricing rules for cost comparison |

Workflow Intelligence API (GET /api/workflows/{sessionId})

Returns these 11 datasets per session:

| Dataset | Content | |---------|---------| | stats | Aggregate session stats: tool count, agent depth, event count | | orchestration | DAG: agent nodes with parent/child edges, depths, types | | toolFlow | Transition matrix: tool A → tool B with counts (common sequences) | | effectiveness | Subagent success: per-type completion rates, avg duration, task success | | patterns | Recurring sequences: detected workflow patterns with frequency | | modelDelegation | Model choices: which models are delegated which tasks | | errorPropagation | Error flow by depth: where in the agent tree errors originate and propagate | | concurrency | Concurrency lanes: overlapping agent execution timelines | | complexity | Complexity score: numerical score based on depth, breadth, tool diversity | | compaction | Compaction impact: token savings, frequency, context health | | cooccurrence | Agent pairs: which agents frequently run together |

Optimization Analyses

1. Tool Flow Optimization

From toolFlow transition data:

  • Identify the most common tool sequences (e.g., Read → Edit → Bash)
  • Find redundant transitions (same tool called repeatedly = retries)
  • Detect anti-patterns: high-frequency failure loops
  • Recommend tool chain shortcuts

2. Subagent Strategy

From effectiveness + orchestration:

  • Which subagent types (task, explore, code-review) have highest completion rates
  • Average duration per subagent type — are subagents taking too long?
  • Underutilized types: tasks that could benefit from delegation
  • Over-spawning: too many subagents for simple tasks

3. Model Delegation Analysis

From modelDelegation:

  • Which models handle which task types
  • Cost-per-task comparison across models
  • Opportunities to delegate simple tasks to cheaper models (Haiku/Sonnet instead of Opus)
  • Calculate estimated savings from model rebalancing

4. Error Prevention

From errorPropagation:

  • Where errors originate (agent depth level)
  • How errors cascade to parent agents
  • Error types (APIError, tool failure) by frequency
  • Defensive strategies: which patterns lead to fewer errors

5. Concurrency Optimization

From concurrency:

  • Which agents run in parallel vs sequential
  • Bottlenecks: sequential agents that could be parallelized
  • Resource contention: overlapping heavy tasks

6. Context Health

From compaction:

  • How often compaction occurs per session
  • Token recovery from compaction baselines
  • Sessions that hit context limits — suggest breaking into smaller tasks

Output

Prioritized recommendations table:

| # | Recommendation | Source Data | Impact | Effort | Est. Savings | |---|---------------|-------------|--------|--------|-------------|

Top 5 recommendations with detailed explanation, supporting data from the workflow API, and implementation steps.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars1.0k
CategoryAutomation
Updated10d ago
Forks238

Languages

JavaScript

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions