SkillAgentSearch skills...

oma-search

Find external documentation, web sources, or remote code with

Install / Use

npx skills add first-fluke/oh-my-agent --skill oma-search

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

82/100

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of oma-search

oma-search scores 82/100 on our quality scale, 733rd of 1,031 Content & Media skills we index.

Its SKILL.md is 4.8 KB long, well organised into 19 sections with 1 code example: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.

With 1,324 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
26/30
Structure
17/20
Description
12/15
Adoption
13/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 7 days ago, so oma-search is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

oma-search compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than oma-search; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
oma-search (this skill)by first-fluke821.3k7d agoSKILL.md
Agent-Reachby Panniantong10086.6k15d agoCLAUDE.md
headroomby headroomlabs-ai10074.2ktodayCLAUDE.md
Scraplingby D4Vinci10084.8ktodayMCP Server
crawl4aiby unclecode10084.6k6d agoMCP Server

Frequently asked questions

How do I install oma-search?
Run npx skills add first-fluke/oh-my-agent --skill oma-search. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does oma-search work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is oma-search safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is oma-search still maintained?
The repository was last updated 7 days ago, so oma-search is actively maintained.

name: oma-search description: Find external documentation, web sources, or remote code with citations. Local code navigation uses the configured code tools.

Search Router

Scheduling

Goal

Route an information request to the appropriate channel and return relevant sources with trust labels.

Intent signature

  • Search, find, look up, reference docs, inspect official APIs, or search remote code.
  • Another skill requests docs, web, code, or local search with a query and constraints.

When to use

  • Library documentation, web research, GitHub/GitLab implementation patterns, or unclear search channels.

When NOT to use

  • Pure local code exploration -> use configured code intelligence under the shared contract.
  • Git history/blame -> oma-scm; architecture analysis -> oma-architecture.

Expected inputs

Query, optional route hint (docs, web, code, local), source/recency constraints, and flags. Explicit --docs, --code, or --web selects the route; --strict filters trust, --wide retains labeled results, and --gitlab selects the remote code host.

Expected outputs

Ranked sources with URL or file reference, route, relevance, trust level/score, and material fallback limits. Do not invent sources when no reliable result is found.

Dependencies

Context7 for docs, runtime web search, oma search/gh/glab for remote code, and configured code intelligence or native local search.

Structural Flow

Routes

| Route | Primary | Fallback | Use for | |---|---|---|---| | docs | Context7 resolve-library-id → query-docs | Web search | Official API/framework documentation | | web | Runtime web search | oma search fetch <url> for known result URLs | Web sources | | code | oma search code | Report unavailable host/auth | Remote repository patterns | | local | Configured code-intelligence provider | Native search and scoped reads | Current project files and symbols |

Failure and recovery

  • Missing/empty documentation lookup: use web search and state the fallback.
  • A known URL cannot be fetched: use the fetch strategies in the route reference; retain authentication/blocking errors if all strategies fail.
  • Configured local tools unavailable or timed out: follow ../_shared/core/code-intelligence.md.
  • Unknown trust: retain the result as unknown with score —; do not imply verification.
  • No result satisfies --strict: report that outcome and offer a wider or narrower query.

Exit

Return evidence-backed results and disclose failed routes or source limitations. A domain score alone does not verify an individual claim.

Logical Operations

Canonical workflow path

  1. Parse the query and explicit flags. Use resources/intent-rules.md only when classification is needed; select one route unless ambiguity requires more.
  2. Dispatch using Routes. Load resources/execution-protocol.md for the selected channel's command flags, fetch strategies, or normalization details.
  3. Collect source references and deduplicate by URL. For non-local results, resolve domain trust using resources/trust-registry.md; reuse the current session cache. Apply --strict after scoring.
  4. Rank by relevance, using trust as a tiebreaker. Return the requested answer or source list with supporting references and fallback limitations.

CLI entry points

oma search code "<query>" [--host gitlab] [--language <lang>] [--repo <owner/repo>]
oma search trust <domain>
oma search fetch <url>

The CLI also exposes api, api:search, meta, rss, rss:google, media, archive, and doctor; use a primitive only when the selected route needs it.

Guardrails

  • Explicit route/source constraints take precedence over automatic classification.
  • Score at domain level, not URL-path or page level. Use the CLI registry and the documented Context7/official-site exceptions; do not invent scores.
  • Do not duplicate successful routes or search locally via the web.
  • Use available runtime web tools and the configured local provider; do not install or track a repository automatically.

Resource scope and effects

Search may contact external services or inspect local code and spawn gh/glab processes. Query constraints, selected sources, and trust metadata are session context; persistent caches belong in generated state, not skill definitions.

References

  • Intent classifier: resources/intent-rules.md (no explicit route or ambiguous query)
  • Route execution detail: resources/execution-protocol.md (selected channel only)
  • Trust resolution and cache rules: resources/trust-registry.md (non-local sources)
  • Recovery detail: resources/error-playbook.md (route failures)
  • Result checklist: resources/checklist.md (applicable route checks)
  • Examples: resources/examples.md (unfamiliar input/output contracts)
  • Local code-intelligence contract: ../_shared/core/code-intelligence.md

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars1.3k
CategoryContent
Updated7d ago
Forks151

Languages

TypeScript

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions