SkillAgentSearch skills...

performance-review

Structure a performance review with self-assessment, manager template, and calibration prep

Install / Use

npx skills add anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill performance-review

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

91/100

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of performance-review

performance-review scores 91/100 on our quality scale, 123rd of 464 Content & Media skills we index (top 27%).

Its SKILL.md is 4.8 KB long, well organised into 31 sections with 5 code examples: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.

With 25,526 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
26/30
Structure
20/20
Description
12/15
Adoption
19/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 2 days ago, so performance-review is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the Apache-2.0 license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

performance-review compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than performance-review; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
performance-review (this skill)by anthropics9125.5k2d agoSKILL.md
siyuanby siyuan-note10046.5ktodayMCP Server
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k4d agoSKILL.md
pptxby anthropics100177.9k4d agoSKILL.md
designby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k5d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install performance-review?
Run npx skills add anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill performance-review. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does performance-review work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is performance-review safe to use?
It is Apache-2.0-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is performance-review still maintained?
The repository was last updated 2 days ago, so performance-review is actively maintained.

name: performance-review description: Structure a performance review with self-assessment, manager template, and calibration prep. Use when review season kicks off and you need a self-assessment template, writing a manager review for a direct report, prepping rating distributions and promotion cases for calibration, or turning vague feedback into specific behavioral examples. argument-hint: "<employee name or review cycle>"

/performance-review

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.

Generate performance review templates and help structure feedback.

Usage

/performance-review $ARGUMENTS

Modes

/performance-review self-assessment       # Generate self-assessment template
/performance-review manager [employee]    # Manager review template for a specific person
/performance-review calibration           # Calibration prep document

If no mode is specified, ask what type of review they need.

Output — Self-Assessment Template

## Self-Assessment: [Review Period]

### Key Accomplishments
[List your top 3-5 accomplishments this period. For each, describe the situation, your contribution, and the impact.]

1. **[Accomplishment]**
   - Situation: [Context]
   - Contribution: [What you did]
   - Impact: [Measurable result]

### Goals Review
| Goal | Status | Evidence |
|------|--------|----------|
| [Goal from last period] | Met / Exceeded / Missed | [How you know] |

### Growth Areas
[Where did you grow? New skills, expanded scope, leadership moments.]

### Challenges
[What was hard? What would you do differently?]

### Goals for Next Period
1. [Goal — specific and measurable]
2. [Goal]
3. [Goal]

### Feedback for Manager
[How can your manager better support you?]

Output — Manager Review

## Performance Review: [Employee Name]
**Period:** [Date range] | **Manager:** [Your name]

### Overall Rating: [Exceeds / Meets / Below Expectations]

### Performance Summary
[2-3 sentence overall assessment]

### Key Strengths
- [Strength with specific example]
- [Strength with specific example]

### Areas for Development
- [Area with specific, actionable guidance]
- [Area with specific, actionable guidance]

### Goal Achievement
| Goal | Rating | Comments |
|------|--------|----------|
| [Goal] | [Rating] | [Specific observations] |

### Impact and Contributions
[Describe their biggest contributions and impact on the team/org]

### Development Plan
| Skill | Current | Target | Actions |
|-------|---------|--------|---------|
| [Skill] | [Level] | [Level] | [How to get there] |

### Compensation Recommendation
[Promotion / Equity refresh / Adjustment / No change — with justification]

Output — Calibration

## Calibration Prep: [Review Cycle]
**Manager:** [Your name] | **Team:** [Team] | **Period:** [Date range]

### Team Overview
| Employee | Role | Level | Tenure | Proposed Rating | Notes |
|----------|------|-------|--------|-----------------|-------|
| [Name] | [Role] | [Level] | [X years] | [Rating] | [Key context] |

### Rating Distribution
| Rating | Count | % of Team | Company Target |
|--------|-------|-----------|----------------|
| Exceeds Expectations | [X] | [X]% | ~15-20% |
| Meets Expectations | [X] | [X]% | ~60-70% |
| Below Expectations | [X] | [X]% | ~10-15% |

### Calibration Discussion Points
1. **[Employee]** — [Why this rating may need discussion, e.g., borderline, first review at level, recent role change]
2. **[Employee]** — [Discussion point]

### Promotion Candidates
| Employee | Current Level | Proposed Level | Justification |
|----------|-------------|----------------|---------------|
| [Name] | [Current] | [Proposed] | [Evidence of next-level performance] |

### Compensation Actions
| Employee | Action | Justification |
|----------|--------|---------------|
| [Name] | [Promotion / Equity refresh / Market adjustment / Retention] | [Why] |

### Manager Notes
[Context the calibration group should know — team changes, org shifts, project impacts]

If Connectors Available

If ~~HRIS is connected:

  • Pull prior review history and goal tracking data
  • Pre-populate employee details and current role information

If ~~project tracker is connected:

  • Pull completed work and contributions for the review period
  • Reference specific tickets and project milestones as evidence

Tips

  1. Be specific — "Great job" isn't feedback. "You reduced deploy time 40% by implementing the new CI pipeline" is.
  2. Balance positive and constructive — Both are essential. Neither should be a surprise.
  3. Focus on behaviors, not personality — "Your documentation has been incomplete" vs. "You're careless."
  4. Make development actionable — "Improve communication" is vague. "Present at the next team all-hands" is actionable.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars25.5k
CategoryContent
Updated2d ago
Forks3.0k

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions