1,936 skills found · Page 42 of 65
brycewang-stanford / acmmm-review-processUse when reasoning about the ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) review pipeline — thematic-area routing to reviewers and area chairs, the OpenReview double-blind process and its single-blind track exceptions, the optional anonymous rebuttal, the meta-review and decision, and the oral/poster and award tiers, an…
brycewang-stanford / acmmm-supplementaryUse when organizing the ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) supplementary material due after the paper deadline — deciding what belongs in the 6-8 page body versus the supplement, packaging video/audio/interactive demos that render on a reviewer's machine, keeping all assets anonymous for double-blind tracks, a…
brycewang-stanford / acmmm-workflowUse when planning the end-to-end ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) campaign calendar — from thematic-area scoping and track choice, through the April OpenReview abstract/paper/supplement chain, the June anonymous rebuttal, the July decision, the August camera-ready, and the November presentation in Rio, with…
brycewang-stanford / acmmm-writing-styleUse when revising an ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) paper for house style — putting the cross-modal contribution on the first page, framing media (figures, video, audio) as evidence rather than decoration, making the fusion the visible claim, and compressing the argument into a 6-8 page ACM sigconf body wi…
brycewang-stanford / aeri-rebuttalUse when responding to an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) conditional-accept decision — addressing the editor's letter within the short window, usually without a second referee round.
brycewang-stanford / ase-author-responseUse when drafting ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) author responses, covering the double-anonymous rebuttal that must first survive the early-rejection gate and — distinctively — the criteria-bound revision-round summary-of-changes that maps every stated revision criterion to a concrete…
brycewang-stanford / ase-related-workUse when writing the related-work and positioning of an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) paper, covering the automated-SE literature lanes, delta-first positioning against prior tools/techniques, fair head-to-head framing, and double-anonymous self-citation.
brycewang-stanford / atc-experimentsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — matching evidence to the claim with real testbeds, fair baselines, end-to-end plus microbenchmark results, tail-latency and variance reporting, workload realism, and…
brycewang-stanford / atc-supplementaryUse when deciding what belongs in the ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) two-page extended abstract, the 12-page paper body, the optional appendix, and the artifact — splitting content by review round and decision-criticality so nothing that decides acceptance lives wh…
brycewang-stanford / atc-workflowUse when planning an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) campaign end to end — running the year backward from the early-June deadline through the two review rounds, the rebuttal, conditional-acceptance shepherding, the post-acceptance artifact evaluation, and the ACM Op…
brycewang-stanford / amr-rebuttalUse when writing the response document for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) Revise & Resubmit — structuring point-by-point replies that show the theory was genuinely strengthened, not just defended.
brycewang-stanford / amr-tables-figuresUse when building the conceptual exhibits of an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript — process models, 2x2 typologies, multi-level frameworks, and propositions tables that carry theoretical work.
brycewang-stanford / aaai-experimentsUse when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phas…
brycewang-stanford / aaai-related-workUse when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legib…
brycewang-stanford / aamas-submissionUse when auditing an AAMAS main-track submission for OpenReview readiness, the 8-page-plus-references limit, the full-paper versus 2-page extended-abstract choice, double-blind anonymity, the supplementary zip cap, track fit across the AAAI/JAAMAS/Blue Sky tracks, dual-submission rules, and desk-rej…
brycewang-stanford / acmmm-submissionUse when auditing an ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) submission for OpenReview readiness — thematic-area choice, the 6-8 page ACM sigconf budget, references-only overflow, double-blind anonymity versus the single-blind Reproducibility/Open-Source/Dataset tracks, supplementary media, dual submission, desk-re…
brycewang-stanford / aeja-submissionUse when running the final pre-submission preflight for an American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) manuscript via the AEA ScholarOne system — single-blind review front matter, JEL codes, submission and publication fees, format, disclosures, and AEA data-policy readiness.
brycewang-stanford / aejpol-submissionUse when running the final pre-submission preflight for AEJ: Economic Policy via the AEA online submission system — single-blind review front matter, JEL codes, submission and publication fees, format, the Data and Code Availability Statement, and disclosure. Final checks; it does not draft content.
brycewang-stanford / aejmac-referee-strategyUse when anticipating the objections referees and coeditors will raise on an American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) manuscript, and calibrating desk-reject and revision odds, before submission.
brycewang-stanford / aejmic-literature-positioningUse when the contribution of an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript is fuzzy or oversold relative to the closest existing results.
brycewang-stanford / aejmic-referee-strategyUse when anticipating referee objections or calibrating review expectations for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript before submission.
brycewang-stanford / aejmic-submissionUse when running the final pre-submission preflight for the American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) via the AEA submission system — single-blind review, the 100-word abstract, JEL classification, the submission fee, format, and the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy.
brycewang-stanford / aeri-literature-positioningUse when positioning the contribution of an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) short-format manuscript against the closest published work in one or two tight paragraphs. Stakes the gap concisely; it does not write the full literature review (there is no room for one).
brycewang-stanford / aeri-referee-strategyUse when calibrating expectations for the fast, decisive American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) review process — conditional-accept-or-reject decisions, the single-round model, and pre-empting the objections a short paper cannot afford.
brycewang-stanford / aeri-replication-packageUse when assembling the data and code deposit for an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) short-format manuscript to pass the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy and the AEA Data Editor's pre-publication reproducibility check.
brycewang-stanford / aeri-robustnessUse when deciding which robustness checks belong in the few in-text words of an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) short-format manuscript versus the online Supplemental Appendix. Triages checks against the length cap; it does not design the identification (see aeri-identification).
brycewang-stanford / aeri-submissionUse when running the final pre-submission preflight for American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) via the AEA/ScholarOne submission system — the word-count and exhibit-count gates, abstract limit, fees, author metadata, declarations, and the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy.
brycewang-stanford / aeri-tables-figuresUse when building or trimming the exhibits of an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) short-format manuscript to the hard five-exhibit budget, one page each, no significance asterisks. Designs the minimum exhibit set; it does not run the analysis behind them.
brycewang-stanford / aeri-topic-selectionUse when deciding whether a project is the ONE crisp, important, well-identified insight that an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) short-format manuscript requires, rather than a multi-result paper for AER or a field paper for the AEJ family.
brycewang-stanford / aeri-writing-styleUse when revising an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) short-format manuscript to lead with the result, fit the hard word cap (7,000 words minus 200 per exhibit), and write the ≤100-word abstract.
