SkillAgentSearch skills...

aeri-rebuttal

Use when responding to an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) conditional-accept decision — addressing the editor's letter within the short window, usually without a second referee round.

Install / Use

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aeri-rebuttal

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

87/100

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of aeri-rebuttal

aeri-rebuttal scores 87/100 on our quality scale, 1749th of 4,610 Development & Engineering skills we index (top 38%).

Its SKILL.md is 4.3 KB long, well organised into 9 sections with 2 code examples: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.

With 1,158 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
26/30
Structure
18/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
13/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 18 days ago, so aeri-rebuttal is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

aeri-rebuttal compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than aeri-rebuttal; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
aeri-rebuttal (this skill)by brycewang-stanford871.2k18d agoSKILL.md
ai-job-searchby MadsLorentzen10044.8ktodayCLAUDE.md
claude-howtoby luongnv8910041.7k3d agoCLAUDE.md
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k10d agoSKILL.md
pptxby anthropics100177.9k10d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install aeri-rebuttal?
Run npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aeri-rebuttal. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does aeri-rebuttal work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is aeri-rebuttal safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is aeri-rebuttal still maintained?
The repository was last updated 18 days ago, so aeri-rebuttal is actively maintained.

name: aeri-rebuttal description: Use when responding to an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) conditional-accept decision — addressing the editor's letter within the short window, usually without a second referee round. Drafts a concise, decisive response and revision plan; it does not redo the analysis (see aeri-robustness / aeri-identification).

Conditional-Accept Response (aeri-rebuttal)

When to trigger

  • A conditional accept letter arrived from AER: Insights
  • You must return a revised short paper within the conditional window (~8 weeks)
  • The letter lists changes the editor expects, and you need a tight response
  • You received a reject and are deciding what to do (see end of this skill)

What an AER: Insights conditional accept means (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准)

AER: Insights does not issue traditional revise-and-resubmit decisions. A conditional accept means the editor expects to publish the paper subject to the changes in the decision letter; authors typically get about 8 weeks to return the revision, which is normally not sent back to referees. The conditions are meant to be achievable without substantial uncertainty — this is finishing, not relitigating. So the response is short, complete, and non-defensive: do what the letter asks, document it crisply, and do not reopen settled issues.

How to respond

  1. Treat the letter as a punch list. Map every requested change to a concrete edit; nothing is "optional."
  2. Comply, don't argue. Since there is no referee round to win, push back only where a request is genuinely infeasible or would be wrong — and then offer an alternative that satisfies the underlying concern.
  3. Keep the response letter short. One numbered item per request: the request, what you did, where in the paper (section/exhibit/line). Editors of a short journal reward concision.
  4. Protect the caps. Edits must keep the paper within 7,000 − 200×(#exhibits) words and ≤5 exhibits — added text or an added exhibit can re-breach the gate. Move new material to the Supplemental Appendix (aeri-robustness).
  5. Finalize the replication package. A conditional accept means the AEA Data Editor check is imminent; have the deposit ready (aeri-replication-package).
  6. Keep the single insight intact. Do not let requested additions turn the short paper into a sprawling one.

Response-letter structure

Dear Editor [name],
Thank you for the conditional acceptance. We have addressed each point below.

1. [Editor request, quoted/paraphrased]
   Response: [what we did], now in [Section/Exhibit/Appendix].
2. ...
We confirm the manuscript remains within the word and exhibit limits, and the
replication package is prepared for the AEA Data Editor.

Checklist

  • [ ] Every item in the decision letter mapped to a concrete edit
  • [ ] Response letter is concise, point-by-point, non-defensive
  • [ ] Any pushback is rare, justified, and offers an alternative
  • [ ] Revised paper still within word + exhibit caps; new material to the appendix
  • [ ] The single insight is unchanged; no scope creep
  • [ ] Replication package finalized for the AEA Data Editor check
  • [ ] Returned within the conditional window (~8 weeks)

Anti-patterns

  • Arguing with the editor as if this were a multi-round R&R
  • Adding text/exhibits that re-breach the word or exhibit cap
  • A long, defensive response letter for a short paper
  • Letting requested additions sprawl the paper beyond its single insight
  • Leaving the data/code deposit until after the response is sent

If it was a REJECT instead

There is no path to relitigate a reject at AER: Insights. Reframe quickly: the short paper is often a strong fit for an AEJ field journal, or can be expanded into a fuller AER-style paper if the idea supports more. Route back to aeri-topic-selection to decide which.

Output format

【Decision】conditional accept / reject
【Punch list】each request → edit → location
【Caps after revision】words = __ (≤ 7000 − 200×__?), exhibits __/5
【Insight intact】single idea unchanged? [Y/N]
【Data editor】replication package ready? [Y/N]
【If reject】next venue (AEJ / expand to AER) → aeri-topic-selection
【Next step】submit revision within ~8-week window

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars1.2k
CategoryDevelopment
Updated18d ago
Forks153

Languages

Stata

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions