aeri-rebuttal
Use when responding to an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) conditional-accept decision — addressing the editor's letter within the short window, usually without a second referee round.
Install / Use
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aeri-rebuttalInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
SKILL.md
Installable skill definition
Quality Score
Category
Development & EngineeringSupported Platforms
Our assessment of aeri-rebuttal
aeri-rebuttal scores 87/100 on our quality scale, 1749th of 4,610 Development & Engineering skills we index (top 38%).
Its SKILL.md is 4.3 KB long, well organised into 9 sections with 2 code examples: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.
With 1,158 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.
Maintenance, license and trust
- The repository was last updated 18 days ago, so aeri-rebuttal is actively maintained.
- It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
- Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
aeri-rebuttal compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than aeri-rebuttal; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| aeri-rebuttal (this skill)by brycewang-stanford | 87 | 1.2k | 18d ago | SKILL.md |
| ai-job-searchby MadsLorentzen | 100 | 44.8k | today | CLAUDE.md |
| claude-howtoby luongnv89 | 100 | 41.7k | 3d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| algorithmic-artby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 10d ago | SKILL.md |
| pptxby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 10d ago | SKILL.md |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install aeri-rebuttal?
- Run
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aeri-rebuttal. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does aeri-rebuttal work with?
- It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is aeri-rebuttal safe to use?
- It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is aeri-rebuttal still maintained?
- The repository was last updated 18 days ago, so aeri-rebuttal is actively maintained.
Skill content
View source on GitHubname: aeri-rebuttal description: Use when responding to an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) conditional-accept decision — addressing the editor's letter within the short window, usually without a second referee round. Drafts a concise, decisive response and revision plan; it does not redo the analysis (see aeri-robustness / aeri-identification).
Conditional-Accept Response (aeri-rebuttal)
When to trigger
- A conditional accept letter arrived from AER: Insights
- You must return a revised short paper within the conditional window (~8 weeks)
- The letter lists changes the editor expects, and you need a tight response
- You received a reject and are deciding what to do (see end of this skill)
What an AER: Insights conditional accept means (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准)
AER: Insights does not issue traditional revise-and-resubmit decisions. A conditional accept means the editor expects to publish the paper subject to the changes in the decision letter; authors typically get about 8 weeks to return the revision, which is normally not sent back to referees. The conditions are meant to be achievable without substantial uncertainty — this is finishing, not relitigating. So the response is short, complete, and non-defensive: do what the letter asks, document it crisply, and do not reopen settled issues.
How to respond
- Treat the letter as a punch list. Map every requested change to a concrete edit; nothing is "optional."
- Comply, don't argue. Since there is no referee round to win, push back only where a request is genuinely infeasible or would be wrong — and then offer an alternative that satisfies the underlying concern.
- Keep the response letter short. One numbered item per request: the request, what you did, where in the paper (section/exhibit/line). Editors of a short journal reward concision.
- Protect the caps. Edits must keep the paper within 7,000 − 200×(#exhibits) words and ≤5 exhibits — added text or an added exhibit can re-breach the gate. Move new material to the Supplemental Appendix (
aeri-robustness). - Finalize the replication package. A conditional accept means the AEA Data Editor check is imminent; have the deposit ready (
aeri-replication-package). - Keep the single insight intact. Do not let requested additions turn the short paper into a sprawling one.
Response-letter structure
Dear Editor [name],
Thank you for the conditional acceptance. We have addressed each point below.
1. [Editor request, quoted/paraphrased]
Response: [what we did], now in [Section/Exhibit/Appendix].
2. ...
We confirm the manuscript remains within the word and exhibit limits, and the
replication package is prepared for the AEA Data Editor.
Checklist
- [ ] Every item in the decision letter mapped to a concrete edit
- [ ] Response letter is concise, point-by-point, non-defensive
- [ ] Any pushback is rare, justified, and offers an alternative
- [ ] Revised paper still within word + exhibit caps; new material to the appendix
- [ ] The single insight is unchanged; no scope creep
- [ ] Replication package finalized for the AEA Data Editor check
- [ ] Returned within the conditional window (~8 weeks)
Anti-patterns
- Arguing with the editor as if this were a multi-round R&R
- Adding text/exhibits that re-breach the word or exhibit cap
- A long, defensive response letter for a short paper
- Letting requested additions sprawl the paper beyond its single insight
- Leaving the data/code deposit until after the response is sent
If it was a REJECT instead
There is no path to relitigate a reject at AER: Insights. Reframe quickly: the short paper is often a strong fit for an AEJ field journal, or can be expanded into a fuller AER-style paper if the idea supports more. Route back to aeri-topic-selection to decide which.
Output format
【Decision】conditional accept / reject
【Punch list】each request → edit → location
【Caps after revision】words = __ (≤ 7000 − 200×__?), exhibits __/5
【Insight intact】single idea unchanged? [Y/N]
【Data editor】replication package ready? [Y/N]
【If reject】next venue (AEJ / expand to AER) → aeri-topic-selection
【Next step】submit revision within ~8-week window
Related Skills
ai-job-search
44.8kThe job search that runs on your machine. AI job application framework built on Claude Code: evaluate postings, tailor CVs, write cover letters, prep interviews. Fork it and own it.
claude-howto
41.7kA visual, example-driven guide to Claude Code — from basic concepts to advanced agents, with copy-paste templates that bring immediate value.
algorithmic-art
177.9kCreating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems.
pptx
177.9kUse this skill any time a .pptx or .potx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx or .potx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an em…
Languages
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
