12,239 skills found · Page 275 of 408
xuzhougeng / audit-biomedical-paper-evidence审读用户提供的生命科学或生物医学论文、PDF、摘要、正文、figure、panel、caption 或截图，定位核心科学问题，逐图解释实验设计和证据链，审计机制、因果性、rescue、方法边界、正交验证与局限。材料缺失时请求补充或转介检索；不提供医疗建议、临床决策或可直接执行的湿实验 SOP。
Pika-Labs / pikastream-video-meetingJoin a Google Meet or Zoom call as a video meeting agent via PikaStreaming. Trigger: user drops a Google Meet or Zoom link, or asks to join a meeting.
itsmostafa / ec2AWS EC2 virtual machine management — instances, security groups, key pairs, AMIs, EBS volumes, Auto Scaling Groups, Spot Instances, Session Manager, placement groups, and instance lifecycle automation.
itsmostafa / cloudwatchAWS CloudWatch monitoring for logs, metrics, alarms, and dashboards
itsmostafa / ecsAWS ECS container orchestration for running Docker containers
itsmostafa / cloudformationAWS CloudFormation infrastructure as code for stack management
itsmostafa / eksAWS EKS Kubernetes management for clusters, node groups, and workloads
itsmostafa / eventbridgeAWS EventBridge serverless event bus for event-driven architectures
itsmostafa / iamAWS Identity and Access Management for users, roles, policies, and permissions
itsmostafa / step-functionsAWS Step Functions workflow orchestration with state machines
brycewang-stanford / acl-author-responseUse when drafting an ACL author response inside an ACL Rolling Review cycle on OpenReview, covering the response window before meta-review, reviewer discussion dynamics, score-change strategy, flagging review issues to the area chair, anonymity rules, and deciding between responding now versus revis…
brycewang-stanford / acl-camera-readyUse when preparing an accepted ACL main-conference or Findings paper for camera-ready, covering the extra content page, de-anonymization and acknowledgements, AI-assistance disclosure, keeping the Limitations section, ACL Anthology metadata and CC BY 4.0 publication, meta-review-driven edits, and pr…
brycewang-stanford / acl-review-processUse when reasoning about how an ACL paper travels through ACL Rolling Review and conference commitment, covering reviewer and area-chair roles, meta-reviews, the commitment decision by senior area chairs and program chairs, Findings versus main-conference outcomes, ethics review escalation, and resu…
brycewang-stanford / acl-workflowUse when planning an ACL project calendar across ACL Rolling Review cycles, covering cycle selection against conference commitment windows, backward planning from an ARR deadline, the review-response-meta-review timeline, commitment decisions, resubmission loops to later cycles, and camera-ready thr…
brycewang-stanford / ase-review-processUse when reasoning about how an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research submission is evaluated, covering double-anonymous review, the early-rejection stage before rebuttal, the Accept / Revision / Reject outcomes, the criteria-bound revision round, and how ASE's process differs from…
brycewang-stanford / ase-submissionUse when auditing an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research-track submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the ACM acmart sigconf template and the 10+2 page budget, double-anonymous review, the mandatory Data Availability Statement, the early-rejection stage before rebuttal, and des…
brycewang-stanford / ase-topic-selectionUse when deciding whether a software-engineering project belongs at ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) or should be routed to ICSE, ESEC/FSE, ISSTA, a PL venue, or an SE journal, and when distinguishing ASE by its automation-centric contribution shape, its tool/technique emphasis, and its…
brycewang-stanford / asplos-artifact-evaluationUse when preparing an ASPLOS artifact for the post-acceptance evaluation committee — writing the ae.tex Artifact Appendix with software/hardware/dataset dependencies, targeting the Available / Functional / Reproducible badges, archiving on a public repository, and planning the collaborative back-and…
brycewang-stanford / asplos-author-responseUse when drafting an ASPLOS author response inside the short fixed window — triaging reviews into factual errors versus questions versus disagreements, budgeting for the ~800 words reviewers are expected to read, arguing only from evidence already in the submission, and positioning the paper for the…
brycewang-stanford / asplos-camera-readyUse when converting an ASPLOS acceptance or Major Revision decision into a publishable ACM paper within the six-week window — de-anonymization, ACM rights and template obligations, the revision change note, artifact-appendix integration and badge placement, and Digital Library metadata checks.
brycewang-stanford / asplos-experimentsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an ASPLOS paper — choosing among real silicon, FPGA prototypes, and simulators with cycle-accuracy caveats stated, selecting workload suites and baselines that hold up across three communities, attributing wins via ablation, and reporting energy, area…
brycewang-stanford / asplos-related-workUse when positioning an ASPLOS submission against three communities' literatures at once — covering the architecture, OS/systems, and PL/compiler lanes plus accelerator and prior-ASPLOS lines, handling own-work and arXiv material under the 2027 double-blind rules, and meeting the full-name/DOI citat…
brycewang-stanford / asplos-reproducibilityUse when hardening an ASPLOS paper's results for independent repetition — pinning simulator versions and configs, recording kernel/firmware/BIOS state, packaging FPGA bitstreams and RTL, documenting hardware dependencies an evaluator may lack, and writing availability statements that match what the…
brycewang-stanford / asplos-review-processUse when reasoning about how an ASPLOS submission will be judged — the two-page rapid-review screen and what it filters, full double-blind review, the author-response window, the Accept / Major Revision / Reject outcome set, how revisions are re-reviewed as submissions, and where authors actually ho…
brycewang-stanford / asplos-submissionUse when running the final pre-upload audit of an ASPLOS submission — the 11-page limit covering figures/tables/footnotes with references excluded, the mandatory template, the no-"et al." full-name citation rule, hyperlinked DOIs, double-blind hygiene, GenAI disclosure, appendix self-containment, an…
brycewang-stanford / asplos-supplementaryUse when deciding what goes into an ASPLOS submission's appendices versus the 11 self-contained pages — applying the rule that reviewers are neither required nor encouraged to read supplemental material, using anonymized supplements for unciteable own work, and staging content for the revision and a…
brycewang-stanford / asplos-topic-selectionUse when deciding whether a project belongs at ASPLOS or at a single-community venue — applying the cross-layer deletion test, matching against ASPLOS's architecture/PL/OS intersection identity, routing to ISCA/MICRO/HPCA, PLDI/POPL, SOSP/OSDI/EuroSys, SC, or MLSys instead, and choosing between the…
brycewang-stanford / asplos-workflowUse when planning an ASPLOS campaign across the two-deadline cycle — sequencing evidence building, the September 9, 2026 submission gate, author-response windows, the December 21 notification, Major Revision resubmission six weeks later, artifact evaluation, and the April 2027 conference in Crete, w…
brycewang-stanford / asplos-writing-styleUse when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include…
brycewang-stanford / atc-review-processUse when reasoning about how an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) submission is evaluated — the two-round extended-abstract model, the round-one gate by two reviewers, the round-two read by 3-4 reviewers, double-blind reviewing, rebuttal, conditional acceptance with s…
