SkillAgentSearch skills...

Dhanvanthiri

Dhanvanthiri ecommerce

Install / Use

npx skills add vigneshsinna/Dhanvanthiri

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
♊

Gemini Rules

Gemini CLI config

Quality Score

37/100

Category

Legal

Supported Platforms

Gemini CLI

Our assessment of Dhanvanthiri

Dhanvanthiri scores 37/100 on our quality scale, 209th of 212 Legal skills we index.

Its Gemini Rules is 1.9 KB long, lightly structured (1 heading) with 1 code example: moderately detailed.

It has no GitHub stars yet, so there is no community track record; judge it on its content.

Substance
20/30
Structure
8/20
Description
4/15
Adoption
0/20
Freshness
5/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • We could not determine when the repository was last updated.
  • Our last check on 2026-10-21 found the source still online.
  • No license is declared. By default that means all rights are reserved: you can read it, but reusing or redistributing it is not clearly permitted. Ask the author before building on it commercially.
  • Its trust signals score 68/100, with 3 cautions from licensing, adoption, age or documentation. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

Safety scan

No issues found

Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful.

AI review by kimi-k2.7-code on 2026-09-24. Automated pattern scan on 2026-09-24. It catches known dangerous patterns, not every risk — read a skill before letting an agent act on it.

Dhanvanthiri compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than Dhanvanthiri; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
Dhanvanthiri (this skill)by vigneshsinna370—Gemini Rules
ui-ux-pro-maxby nextlevelbuilder100143.4k6d agoSKILL.md
design-isby thedotmack100107.6k6d agoSKILL.md
constraint-driven-developmentby addyosmani100112.2k6d agoSKILL.md
hyperframes-cliby heygen-com10076.6k6d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install Dhanvanthiri?
Run npx skills add vigneshsinna/Dhanvanthiri. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does Dhanvanthiri work with?
It is written for Gemini CLI, as a Gemini Rules file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is Dhanvanthiri safe to use?
Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful. It declares no license and scores 68/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is Dhanvanthiri still maintained?
We could not determine when the repository was last updated.

Spec Compliance Reviewer Prompt Template

Use this template when dispatching a spec compliance reviewer subagent.

Purpose: Verify implementer built what was requested (nothing more, nothing less)

Task tool (general-purpose):
  description: "Review spec compliance for Task N"
  prompt: |
    You are reviewing whether an implementation matches its specification.

    ## What Was Requested

    [FULL TEXT of task requirements]

    ## What Implementer Claims They Built

    [From implementer's report]

    ## CRITICAL: Do Not Trust the Report

    The implementer finished suspiciously quickly. Their report may be incomplete,
    inaccurate, or optimistic. You MUST verify everything independently.

    **DO NOT:**
    - Take their word for what they implemented
    - Trust their claims about completeness
    - Accept their interpretation of requirements

    **DO:**
    - Read the actual code they wrote
    - Compare actual implementation to requirements line by line
    - Check for missing pieces they claimed to implement
    - Look for extra features they didn't mention

    ## Your Job

    Read the implementation code and verify:

    **Missing requirements:**
    - Did they implement everything that was requested?
    - Are there requirements they skipped or missed?
    - Did they claim something works but didn't actually implement it?

    **Extra/unneeded work:**
    - Did they build things that weren't requested?
    - Did they over-engineer or add unnecessary features?
    - Did they add "nice to haves" that weren't in spec?

    **Misunderstandings:**
    - Did they interpret requirements differently than intended?
    - Did they solve the wrong problem?
    - Did they implement the right feature but wrong way?

    **Verify by reading code, not by trusting report.**

    Report:
    - ✅ Spec compliant (if everything matches after code inspection)
    - ❌ Issues found: [list specifically what's missing or extra, with file:line references]

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars0
CategoryLegal
UpdatedNaNy ago
Forks0

Trust signals

68/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

2 medium1 low