ci-cd-and-automation
Shift Left, Faster is Safer, feature flags, quality gate pipelines, failure feedback loops
Install / Use
npx skills add v1truv1us/ai-eng-system --skill ci-cd-and-automationInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
Gemini Rules
Gemini CLI config
Quality Score
Category
AutomationSupported Platforms
Tags
Our assessment of ci-cd-and-automation
ci-cd-and-automation scores 69/100 on our quality scale, 2663rd of 2,866 Automation skills we index.
Its Gemini Rules is 5.8 KB long, well organised into 33 sections with 1 code example: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.
It has no GitHub stars yet, so there is no community track record; judge it on its content.
Maintenance, license and trust
- The repository was last updated about 3 months ago, so ci-cd-and-automation is actively maintained.
- Our last check on 2026-10-18 found the source still online.
- No license is declared. By default that means all rights are reserved: you can read it, but reusing or redistributing it is not clearly permitted. Ask the author before building on it commercially.
- Its trust signals score 80/100, with 2 cautions from licensing, adoption, age or documentation. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
Safety scan
No issues foundOur scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful.
AI review by kimi-k2.7-code on 2026-09-24. Automated pattern scan on 2026-09-24. It catches known dangerous patterns, not every risk — read a skill before letting an agent act on it.
ci-cd-and-automation compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than ci-cd-and-automation; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ci-cd-and-automation (this skill)by v1truv1us | 69 | 0 | 3mo ago | Gemini Rules |
| Agent-Reachby Panniantong | 100 | 109.2k | today | CLAUDE.md |
| Scraplingby D4Vinci | 100 | 97.9k | today | MCP Server |
| rufloby ruvnet | 100 | 81.0k | today | MCP Server |
| openclawby thedotmack | 100 | 107.6k | 5d ago | SKILL.md |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install ci-cd-and-automation?
- Run
npx skills add v1truv1us/ai-eng-system. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does ci-cd-and-automation work with?
- It is written for Gemini CLI, as a Gemini Rules file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is ci-cd-and-automation safe to use?
- Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful. It declares no license and scores 80/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is ci-cd-and-automation still maintained?
- The repository was last updated about 3 months ago, so ci-cd-and-automation is actively maintained.
Skill content
View source on GitHubname: ci-cd-and-automation description: Shift Left, Faster is Safer, feature flags, quality gate pipelines, failure feedback loops. Use when setting up or modifying build and deploy pipelines.
CI/CD and Automation
Overview
Build and deployment pipelines should enforce quality automatically. Apply Shift Left principles (catch issues early), use feature flags for safe releases, and make the pipeline the authority on whether code is ready to ship.
When to Use
- Setting up CI/CD for a new project
- Modifying existing build or deploy pipelines
- Adding quality gates or automated checks
- Troubleshooting pipeline failures
Core Principles
Shift Left
Catch issues as early as possible:
- Lint and format on save or pre-commit
- Run type checks locally before push
- Run unit tests on every push
- Run integration tests on every PR
- Run security scans on merge to main
Faster is Safer
Small, frequent deployments are safer than large, infrequent ones:
- Automate the deployment process completely
- Make rollbacks trivial
- Deploy to staging automatically on merge
- Deploy to production with a single approval or automatically
Feature Flags
Use feature flags for:
- Incomplete features merged to main
- A/B testing and gradual rollouts
- Kill switches for new functionality
- Environment-specific behavior
Quality Gate Pipeline
Standard pipeline stages:
- Lint and format check
- Type check
- Unit tests with coverage
- Build
- Integration tests
- Security scan
- Deploy to staging
- Smoke tests
- Deploy to production
Process
Step 1: Define Pipeline Stages
- List all automated checks the project needs
- Order them fastest-failing-first
- Ensure each stage has clear pass/fail criteria
Step 2: Implement Fast Feedback
- Ensure lint and type checks run in under 30 seconds
- Ensure unit tests run in under 2 minutes
- Provide clear error output for each failure
Step 3: Add Deployment Automation
- Automated staging deployment on merge
- Automated production deployment with approval gate
- Rollback procedure that can execute in under 1 minute
Step 4: Monitor Pipeline Health
- Track build success rates
- Track mean time to recovery from failures
- Alert on pipeline failures that block merges
Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality | |---|---| | "The pipeline can be fixed later" | Broken pipelines encourage bypassing them, which defeats their purpose. | | "Full automation is too much work" | Manual deployment is slower, more error-prone, and harder to audit. | | "Feature flags add complexity" | Feature flags add controlled complexity that prevents uncontrolled deployment risk. |
Verification
- [ ] Pipeline runs on every push and PR
- [ ] Fastest checks run first
- [ ] Each stage has clear pass/fail criteria
- [ ] Deployment is fully automated
- [ ] Rollback takes under 1 minute
Anti-Rationalization Table
| Excuse | Counter | |--------|---------| | "The pipeline can be fixed later" | Broken pipelines encourage bypassing them, which defeats their purpose. | | "Full automation is too much work" | Manual deployment is slower, more error-prone, and harder to audit. | | "Feature flags add complexity" | Feature flags add controlled complexity that prevents uncontrolled deployment risk. | | "We don't need staging, just deploy to production" | Staging catches environment-specific issues before they reach users. | | "The pipeline is fast enough" | Slow pipelines discourage frequent commits. Fast feedback enables trunk-based development. |
Imported from cursor-team-kit/loop-on-ci (MIT, cursor/plugins)
Loop on CI
Trigger
Need to watch a branch or pull request and iterate on CI failures until all required checks are green.
Use gh pr checks as the source of truth. It includes all PR-attached checks, while gh run list only covers GitHub Actions.
Workflow
- Resolve the PR for the current branch.
- Inspect current PR checks before waiting.
- If checks already failed, diagnose those failures first.
- If checks are pending, watch with
gh pr checks --watch --fail-fast. - After each push, re-check the full PR check set and repeat until green.
Commands
# Resolve the active PR
gh pr view --json number,url,headRefName
# Inspect all attached checks
gh pr checks --json name,bucket,state,workflow,link
# Watch pending checks and fail fast
gh pr checks --watch --fail-fast
# GitHub Actions logs, when the failing check links to a GHA run
gh run view <run-id> --log-failed
Guardrails
- Keep each fix scoped to a single failure cause when possible.
- Do not bypass hooks (
--no-verify) to force progress. - If the failure is clearly unrelated to the PR and appears fixed on main, merge latest main instead of bloating the PR with unrelated fixes.
- If failures are flaky, retry once and report flake evidence.
- Re-run
gh pr checks --json name,bucket,state,workflow,linkafter every push; the check set can change.
Output
- Current CI status
- Failure summary and fixes applied
- PR URL once checks are green
Imported from cursor-team-kit/fix-ci (MIT, cursor/plugins)
Fix CI
Trigger
Branch or PR CI is failing and needs a fast, iterative path to green checks.
Workflow
- Resolve the active PR and inspect
gh pr checks --json name,bucket,state,workflow,link. - Inspect failed jobs and extract the first actionable error. Use GitHub Actions logs when available; otherwise use the check link to identify the failing command or service.
- Apply the smallest safe fix.
- Push, re-check the PR check set, and repeat until green.
Guardrails
- Fix one actionable failure at a time.
- Prefer minimal, low-risk changes before broader refactors.
- Keep
gh pr checksas the source of truth for overall PR CI state.
Output
- Primary failing job and root error
- Fixes applied in iteration order
- Current CI status and next action
Related Skills
Agent-Reach
109.2kGive your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Read & search Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu — one CLI, zero API fees.
Scrapling
97.9k🕷️ The BEST Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full-scale crawl! Don't be shy, join here: https://discord.gg/EMgGbDceNQ and follow here for daily tips and tricks: https://x.com/Scrapling_dev
ruflo
81.0k🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated
openclaw
107.6kThis guide walks through setting up the claude-mem plugin on an OpenClaw gateway. By the end, your agents will have persistent memory across sessions via system prompt context injection, and optionally a real-time observation feed streaming to a messaging channel.
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
