use-case-testing
Create and test use cases for developed features with automated fixes
Install / Use
npx skills add tupe12334/npm-revdepsInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
Claude Commands
Claude Code slash commands
Quality Score
Category
AutomationSupported Platforms
Our assessment of use-case-testing
use-case-testing scores 66/100 on our quality scale, 2718th of 2,897 Automation skills we index.
Its Claude Commands is 8.5 KB long, well organised into 32 sections with 6 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.
It has no GitHub stars yet, so there is no community track record; judge it on its content.
Maintenance, license and trust
- We could not determine when the repository was last updated.
- Our last check on 2026-09-28 found the source still online.
- No license is declared. By default that means all rights are reserved: you can read it, but reusing or redistributing it is not clearly permitted. Ask the author before building on it commercially.
- Its trust signals score 68/100, with 3 cautions from licensing, adoption, age or documentation. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
Safety scan
No issues foundOur scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful.
AI review by kimi-k2.7-code on 2026-09-24. Automated pattern scan on 2026-09-24. It catches known dangerous patterns, not every risk — read a skill before letting an agent act on it.
use-case-testing compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than use-case-testing; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| use-case-testing (this skill)by tupe12334 | 66 | 0 | — | Claude Commands |
| claude-memby thedotmack | 100 | 95.2k | today | CLAUDE.md |
| Agent-Reachby Panniantong | 100 | 89.0k | 17d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| Understand-Anythingby Egonex-AI | 100 | 85.1k | 1d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| headroomby headroomlabs-ai | 100 | 74.3k | today | CLAUDE.md |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install use-case-testing?
- Run
npx skills add tupe12334/npm-revdeps. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does use-case-testing work with?
- It is written for Claude Code, as a Claude Commands file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is use-case-testing safe to use?
- Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful. It declares no license and scores 68/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is use-case-testing still maintained?
- We could not determine when the repository was last updated.
Skill content
View source on GitHubdescription: Create and test use cases for developed features with automated fixes
Use Case Testing & Validation
Create comprehensive use cases for the feature you developed, test them all systematically, and ensure everything works correctly. Fix any issues found during testing.
Instructions
Follow this systematic approach to validate your feature through real-world use cases:
Phase 1: Use Case Creation
Identify the feature context:
- Review what was just implemented or changed
- Check active specifications in
.kiro/specs/if applicable - Examine recent commits and modified files
- Understand the feature's purpose and scope
Generate comprehensive use cases:
- Happy Path Scenarios - Normal, expected usage flows
- Edge Cases - Boundary conditions and unusual inputs
- Error Cases - Invalid inputs, network failures, missing data
- User Journeys - End-to-end workflows involving the feature
- Integration Points - How the feature interacts with other components
Document each use case with:
## Use Case #: [Title]
**Type:** Happy Path | Edge Case | Error Case | User Journey | Integration
**Description:** What this use case validates
**Preconditions:** What must be true before testing
**Steps:**
1. Action 1
2. Action 2
3. ...
**Expected Outcome:** What should happen
**Test Method:** Unit | Integration | E2E | Playwright
Phase 2: Determine Testing Strategy
For Backend/API/Server Features:
- Use unit tests (Vitest, Jest, etc.)
- Use integration tests for database/API interactions
- Use API testing tools (curl, fetch) for endpoint validation
- Run existing test suites to catch regressions
For Frontend/Client Features:
- Use Playwright MCP for browser-based testing
- Test UI interactions, form submissions, navigation
- Validate visual elements and user feedback
- Check responsive behavior if applicable
- Verify accessibility if relevant
For Full-Stack Features:
- Combine both approaches
- Test API endpoints first
- Then test client integration with Playwright
- Verify end-to-end data flow
Phase 3: Execute Tests Systematically
Create a test execution plan:
# Example test plan
1. Run existing test suite to ensure no regressions
2. Execute Use Case 1: [Title]
3. Execute Use Case 2: [Title]
4. Execute Use Case 3: [Title]
...
For each use case:
- Setup: Prepare test environment, data, and preconditions
- Execute: Run the test following the documented steps
- Verify: Check that actual outcome matches expected outcome
- Document: Record result (✅ Pass | ❌ Fail with details)
Use TodoWrite to track progress:
- [ ] Use Case 1: User login with valid credentials
- [ ] Use Case 2: User login with invalid credentials
- [ ] Use Case 3: Password reset flow
...
Phase 4: Playwright Testing (Client Features)
When to use Playwright MCP:
- Any feature involving the browser/UI
- Form interactions and submissions
- Navigation and routing changes
- Visual feedback and animations
- Client-side state management
- User interactions (clicks, typing, selections)
Playwright testing workflow:
-
Navigate to the feature:
Use mcp__playwright__browser_navigate to open the page Use mcp__playwright__browser_snapshot to see current state -
Interact with elements:
Use mcp__playwright__browser_click to click buttons/links Use mcp__playwright__browser_type to fill forms Use mcp__playwright__browser_select_option for dropdowns -
Verify outcomes:
Use mcp__playwright__browser_snapshot to verify UI state Use mcp__playwright__browser_console_messages for console errors Use mcp__playwright__browser_take_screenshot for visual verification -
Test different scenarios:
- Valid inputs → success paths
- Invalid inputs → error messages
- Edge cases → proper handling
- Network conditions → loading states
Example Playwright test flow:
Testing: User Registration Form
1. Navigate to /register
2. Take snapshot to verify form elements exist
3. Fill in valid user details
4. Click submit button
5. Verify success message appears
6. Check console for errors (should be none)
7. Navigate to login page
8. Verify can login with new credentials
Phase 5: Fix Failures
When tests fail:
-
Analyze the failure:
- Read error messages carefully
- Check console logs and network requests
- Review stack traces
- Identify root cause
-
Categorize the issue:
- Implementation bug
- Test case error
- Environment issue
- Missing dependency
-
Fix systematically:
- Fix implementation bugs in source code
- Update tests if expectations were wrong
- Document any environment requirements
- Add missing error handling
-
Verify the fix:
- Re-run the failed test
- Run related tests to ensure no new issues
- Run full test suite if significant changes made
-
Update use case documentation:
- Note any changes to expected behavior
- Update preconditions if needed
- Refine test steps for clarity
Phase 6: Regression Prevention
After all tests pass:
-
Convert use cases to automated tests:
- Write unit/integration tests for backend use cases
- Create Playwright test scripts for client use cases
- Add tests to CI/CD pipeline if possible
-
Document test coverage:
- List all validated use cases
- Note any use cases that need manual testing
- Identify gaps in test coverage
-
Run full test suite:
npm test # or pnpm test, yarn test npm run test:e2e # if applicable -
Verify no regressions:
- All existing tests still pass
- New tests pass
- No console errors or warnings
- Application builds successfully
Phase 7: Final Validation
Comprehensive checks:
- [ ] All use cases documented
- [ ] All use cases tested (automated or manual)
- [ ] All tests passing
- [ ] No console errors
- [ ] No TypeScript/linting errors
- [ ] Code builds successfully
- [ ] Documentation updated if needed
- [ ] Ready for code review/deployment
Report results:
## Use Case Testing Summary
**Feature:** [Feature name]
**Total Use Cases:** X
**Passed:** Y
**Failed (Fixed):** Z
**Test Coverage:** Backend | Frontend | Full-Stack
### Use Cases Validated:
1. ✅ [Use Case 1]
2. ✅ [Use Case 2]
3. ✅ [Use Case 3] (initially failed, fixed: [brief description])
...
### Issues Found & Fixed:
- [Issue 1]: [Description] → [Fix applied]
- [Issue 2]: [Description] → [Fix applied]
### Test Artifacts:
- Unit tests: [file paths]
- Playwright tests: [scenarios covered]
- Screenshots: [if applicable]
**Status:** ✅ All use cases validated, feature ready for review
Best Practices
Use Case Creation:
- Think from user's perspective
- Cover both technical and business requirements
- Include accessibility and performance considerations
- Don't just test happy paths
Testing Execution:
- Test in isolation first, then integration
- Use realistic test data
- Test with different user roles/permissions if applicable
- Consider mobile/responsive scenarios for UI features
Playwright Usage:
- Always check browser console for errors
- Take screenshots of important states
- Test keyboard navigation for accessibility
- Verify loading states and transitions
- Test error messages are user-friendly
Fixing Issues:
- Fix root causes, not symptoms
- Add validation to prevent similar issues
- Update related documentation
- Consider if fix needs broader changes
Quality Standards:
- Zero console errors
- All tests passing
- Code follows project conventions
- Feature works as specified
- Edge cases handled gracefully
Example Workflow
# 1. Analyze what was implemented
git diff main...HEAD --stat
git log -5 --oneline
# 2. Create use cases document (if complex feature)
# Create use-cases.md in feature directory or spec
# 3. Run existing tests first
npm test
# 4. For client features: start Playwright
# Navigate and test through Playwright MCP tools
# 5. For backend features: write and run tests
# Create test files, run npm test
# 6. Track progress with TodoWrite
# Mark each use case as completed
# 7. Fix any failures
# Edit source code, re-run tests
# 8. Final validation
npm run build
npm test
npm run lint
# 9. Report results
# Provide summary of what was tested and validated
Remember: Thorough use case testing catches issues before users do. Test realistically, fix properly, and ensure your feature works in all scenarios it will encounter in production.
Related Skills
claude-mem
95.2kPersistent Context Across Sessions for Every Agent – Captures everything your agent does during sessions, compresses it with AI, and injects relevant context back into future sessions. Works with Claude Code, OpenClaw, Codex, Gemini, Hermes, Copilot, OpenCode + More
Agent-Reach
89.0kGive your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Read & search Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu — one CLI, zero API fees.
Understand-Anything
85.1kGraphs that teach > graphs that impress. Turn any code into an interactive knowledge graph you can explore, search, and ask questions about. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Copilot, Gemini CLI, and more.
headroom
74.3kCompress tool outputs, logs, files, and RAG chunks before they reach the LLM. 20% fewer tokens for coding agents, 60-95% fewer tokens for JSON, same answers. Library, proxy, MCP server.
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
