web-quality-audit
Comprehensive web quality audit covering performance, accessibility, SEO, and best practices in a single review
Install / Use
npx skills add tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill web-quality-auditInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
SKILL.md
Installable skill definition
Quality Score
Category
MarketingSupported Platforms
Our assessment of web-quality-audit
web-quality-audit scores 88/100 on our quality scale, 131st of 219 Marketing skills we index.
Its SKILL.md is 6.8 KB long, well organised into 19 sections with 1 code example: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.
With 6,832 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.
Maintenance, license and trust
- The repository was last updated 6 days ago, so web-quality-audit is actively maintained.
- No license is declared. By default that means all rights are reserved: you can read it, but reusing or redistributing it is not clearly permitted. Ask the author before building on it commercially.
- Its trust signals score 88/100, with 1 caution from licensing, adoption, age or documentation. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
web-quality-audit compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than web-quality-audit; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| web-quality-audit (this skill)by tech-leads-club | 88 | 6.8k | 6d ago | SKILL.md |
| algorithmic-artby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 4d ago | SKILL.md |
| pptxby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 4d ago | SKILL.md |
| designby nextlevelbuilder | 100 | 130.2k | 5d ago | SKILL.md |
| ui-ux-pro-maxby nextlevelbuilder | 100 | 130.2k | 5d ago | SKILL.md |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install web-quality-audit?
- Run
npx skills add tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill web-quality-audit. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does web-quality-audit work with?
- It is written for Zed, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is web-quality-audit safe to use?
- It declares no license and scores 88/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is web-quality-audit still maintained?
- The repository was last updated 6 days ago, so web-quality-audit is actively maintained.
Skill content
View source on GitHubname: web-quality-audit description: Comprehensive web quality audit covering performance, accessibility, SEO, and best practices in a single review. Use when asked to "audit my site", "review web quality", "run lighthouse audit", "check page quality", or "optimize my website" across multiple areas at once. Orchestrates specialized skills for depth. Do NOT use for single-area audits — prefer core-web-vitals, web-accessibility, seo, or web-best-practices for focused work. license: MIT metadata: author: web-quality-skills version: '1.0'
Web quality audit
Comprehensive quality review based on Google Lighthouse audits. Covers Performance, Accessibility, SEO, and Best Practices across 150+ checks.
How it works
- Analyze the provided code/project for quality issues
- Categorize findings by severity (Critical, High, Medium, Low)
- Provide specific, actionable recommendations
- Include code examples for fixes
Audit categories
Performance (40% of typical issues)
Core Web Vitals — Must pass for good page experience:
- LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) < 2.5s. The largest visible element must render quickly. Optimize images, fonts, and server response time.
- INP (Interaction to Next Paint) < 200ms. User interactions must feel instant. Reduce JavaScript execution time and break up long tasks.
- CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) < 0.1. Content must not jump around. Set explicit dimensions on images, embeds, and ads.
Resource Optimization:
- Compress images. Use WebP/AVIF with fallbacks. Serve correctly sized images via
srcset. - Minimize JavaScript. Remove unused code. Use code splitting. Defer non-critical scripts.
- Optimize CSS. Extract critical CSS. Remove unused styles. Avoid
@import. - Efficient fonts. Use
font-display: swap. Preload critical fonts. Subset to needed characters.
Loading Strategy:
- Preconnect to origins. Add
<link rel="preconnect">for third-party domains. - Preload critical assets. LCP images, fonts, and above-fold CSS.
- Lazy load below-fold content. Images, iframes, and heavy components.
- Cache effectively. Long cache TTLs for static assets. Immutable caching for hashed files.
Accessibility (30% of typical issues)
Perceivable:
- Text alternatives. Every
<img>has meaningfulalttext. Decorative images usealt="". - Color contrast. Minimum 4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text (WCAG AA).
- Don't rely on color alone. Use icons, patterns, or text alongside color indicators.
- Captions and transcripts. Video has captions. Audio has transcripts.
Operable:
- Keyboard accessible. All functionality available via keyboard. No keyboard traps.
- Focus visible. Clear focus indicators on all interactive elements.
- Skip links. Provide "Skip to main content" for keyboard users.
- Sufficient time. Users can extend time limits. No auto-advancing content without controls.
Understandable:
- Page language. Set
langattribute on<html>. - Consistent navigation. Same navigation structure across pages.
- Error identification. Form errors clearly described and associated with fields.
- Labels and instructions. All form inputs have associated labels.
Robust:
- Valid HTML. No duplicate IDs. Properly nested elements.
- ARIA used correctly. Prefer native elements. ARIA roles match behavior.
- Name, role, value. Interactive elements have accessible names and correct roles.
SEO (15% of typical issues)
Crawlability:
- Valid robots.txt. Doesn't block important resources.
- XML sitemap. Lists all important pages. Submitted to Search Console.
- Canonical URLs. Prevent duplicate content issues.
- No noindex on important pages. Check meta robots and headers.
On-Page SEO:
- Unique title tags. 50-60 characters. Primary keyword included.
- Meta descriptions. 150-160 characters. Compelling and unique.
- Heading hierarchy. Single
<h1>. Logical heading structure. - Descriptive link text. Not "click here" or "read more".
Technical SEO:
- Mobile-friendly. Responsive design. Tap targets ≥ 48px.
- HTTPS. Secure connection required.
- Fast loading. Performance directly impacts ranking.
- Structured data. JSON-LD for rich snippets (Article, Product, FAQ, etc.).
Best practices (15% of typical issues)
Security:
- HTTPS everywhere. No mixed content. HSTS enabled.
- No vulnerable libraries. Keep dependencies updated.
- CSP headers. Content Security Policy to prevent XSS.
- No exposed source maps. In production builds.
Modern Standards:
- No deprecated APIs. Replace
document.write, synchronous XHR, etc. - Valid doctype. Use
<!DOCTYPE html>. - Charset declared.
<meta charset="UTF-8">as first element in<head>. - No browser errors. Clean console. No CORS issues.
UX Patterns:
- No intrusive interstitials. Especially on mobile.
- Clear permission requests. Only ask when needed, with context.
- No misleading buttons. Buttons do what they say.
Severity levels
| Level | Description | Action | | ------------ | --------------------------------------------- | ------------------- | | Critical | Security vulnerabilities, complete failures | Fix immediately | | High | Core Web Vitals failures, major a11y barriers | Fix before launch | | Medium | Performance opportunities, SEO improvements | Fix within sprint | | Low | Minor optimizations, code quality | Fix when convenient |
Audit output format
When performing an audit, structure findings as:
## Audit results
### Critical issues (X found)
- **[Category]** Issue description. File: `path/to/file.js:123`
- **Impact:** Why this matters
- **Fix:** Specific code change or recommendation
### High priority (X found)
...
### Summary
- Performance: X issues (Y critical)
- Accessibility: X issues (Y critical)
- SEO: X issues
- Best Practices: X issues
### Recommended priority
1. First fix this because...
2. Then address...
3. Finally optimize...
Quick checklist
Before every deploy
- [ ] Core Web Vitals passing
- [ ] No accessibility errors (axe/Lighthouse)
- [ ] No console errors
- [ ] HTTPS working
- [ ] Meta tags present
Weekly review
- [ ] Check Search Console for issues
- [ ] Review Core Web Vitals trends
- [ ] Update dependencies
- [ ] Test with screen reader
Monthly deep dive
- [ ] Full Lighthouse audit
- [ ] Performance profiling
- [ ] Accessibility audit with real users
- [ ] SEO keyword review
References
For detailed guidelines on specific areas:
Related Skills
algorithmic-art
177.9kCreating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems.
pptx
177.9kUse this skill any time a .pptx or .potx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx or .potx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an em…
design
130.2kComprehensive design skill: brand identity, design tokens, UI styling, logo generation (55 styles, Gemini, Atlas Cloud, or MuAPI AI), corporate identity program (50 deliverables, CIP mockups), HTML presentations (Chart.js), banner design (22 styles, social/ads/web/print), icon design (15 styles, SVG…
ui-ux-pro-max
130.2kUI/UX design intelligence for web, mobile, and desktop. This skill should be used when designing, building, reviewing, or fixing interfaces, including pages, components, design systems, accessibility, interaction, responsive layout, typography, color, charts, and stack-specific UI implementation.
Languages
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
