SkillAgentSearch skills...

HybridESM

This page reviews and organizes emerging hybrid Earth System Models (ESMs), which combine machine learning and physics-based components.

Install / Use

/learn @tbeucler/HybridESM
About this skill

Quality Score

0/100

Supported Platforms

Universal

README

Towards Hybrid Earth System Modeling: A Living Review

This page presents an alphabetical review of emerging approaches that bring machine learning (ML) into Earth system modeling to simulate the full time evolution of climate variables in response to diverse forcings. These models hold promise for improving long-term projections of Earth's physical climate and biogeochemical cycles. Although new creative approaches continue to emerge, most designs fall into two broad categories:

  1. Hybridizing existing Earth system models (ESMs)
    Hybrid ESMs build on established ESM codebases, retaining key physics components (e.g., the dynamical core) while replacing or improving parameterizations of hard-to-model processes (e.g., storm formation) with ML. This often involves interfacing Fortran-based codebases with Python-based ML tools. For related technical resources, see this living review maintained by Julien Le Sommer and Alexis Barge.

  2. Developing data-driven climate models from scratch
    Climate emulators write prognostic equations directly in differentiable programming frameworks, incorporating explicit physical laws (e.g., conservation equations) only when needed. This is a longer-term endeavor, involving the progressive development and coupling of the atmosphere–ocean–land–cryosphere components.

If you notice any errors, omissions, or outdated information, please feel free to submit a pull request.

<ins>Author</ins>: Tom Beucler (UNIL); written in the context of AI4PEX and the WCRP Lighthouse Activities.

How to cite

Beucler, T. (2025). Towards Hybrid Earth System Modeling: A Living Review (v1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16967529

Table of Contents


ACE

The Ai2 Climate Emulator (ACE) emulates NOAA's FV3GFS atmospheric model using spherical Fourier neural operators. ACE operates with six prognostic variables, can be forced through insolation and sea surface skin temperature, diagnoses radiative and energy fluxes at the atmosphere's boundaries, and runs on a single GPU. ACE2 improves upon ACE by enforcing global conservation of dry air mass and humidity, making it a hybrid climate model and improving climate stability and surface pressure representation. ACE2, which can be coupled to a slab ocean or a 3D ocean emulator, is trained and tested on historical climate reanalysis (1940-2020) and 100 km-resolution Unified Forecast System (UFS) simulations forced by historical sea surface temperatures and greenhouse gas concentrations.

Latest simulations in Duncan, J. P. C., Wu, E., Dheeshjith, S., Subel, A., Arcomano, T., Clark, S. K., ... & Bretherton, C. (2025). SamudrACE: Fast and Accurate Coupled Climate Modeling with 3D Ocean and Atmosphere Emulators. arXiv:2509.12490

See also:


CAMulator

CAMulator v1 is a machine-learned emulator of the Community Atmosphere Model v6 (CAM6) that predicts atmospheric states from sea surface temperatures and solar radiation. It conserves key physical quantities, captures major climate patterns like ENSO and NAO, and runs 350× faster than CAM6—enabling large-scale, physically grounded climate simulations. While it exhibits a cold bias in high-latitude winters outside its training range, CAMulator represents a major advance toward fast, realistic ML-based climate modeling.

Latest simulations in Chapman, W. E., Schreck, J. S., Sha, Y., Gagne II, D. J., Kimpara, D., Zanna, L., ... & Berner, J. (2025). CAMulator: Fast Emulation of the Community Atmosphere Model. arXiv preprint 2504.06007.

See also:


CBRAIN

Cloud Brain (CBRAIN) aims to break the convective parameterization deadlock in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) by training neural networks to emulate the total subgrid thermodynamic time tendencies. These tendencies represent the cumulative tendencies of prognostic thermodynamic variables (temperature and specific humidity) due to subgrid-scale processes such as convection, radiation, and turbulence.

Latest simulations in Lin, J., Yu, S., Peng, L., Beucler, T., Wong-Toi, E., Hu, Z., ... & Pritchard, M. S. (2024). Sampling Hybrid Climate Simulation at Scale to Reliably Improve Machine Learning Parameterization. arXiv preprint 2309.16177.

See also:

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars59
CategoryEducation
Updated22d ago
Forks8

Security Score

95/100

Audited on Mar 6, 2026

No findings