critique

description: Grade a rendered ad's visual design against the rubric and fix what's weak argument-hint: [ad slug, optionally "review only" to skip the fixes]

Run a design pass. Target: $ARGUMENTS — if empty, use the ad this conversation has been working on, or the only folder in ads/.

Invoke the critique-ad skill and follow it. It owns the rubric, the thumbnail test, and where each class of fix belongs; don't restate any of that here.

Two things this command settles before the skill starts:

The input is pixels, never source. Render first, or grab frames for motion. If you haven't looked at the image, you haven't reviewed the ad.

Scope. This grades and fixes design — layout, hierarchy, type, colour, space, thumbnail legibility. It does not rewrite the offer, the angle, or the CTA target; flag those and let the user decide. Copy is fair game only where length is a layout problem, and cutting words always beats shrinking type.

If the argument says "review only", score and report without editing.

Distinct from /verify, which asks whether the ad rendered correctly. This one asks whether it's any good. An ad can pass /verify completely and still fail here at thumbnail size.