SkillAgentSearch skills...

Psc

E2E encryption for multi-hop tty sessions or portshells + TCP/UDP port forward

Install / Use

/learn @stealth/Psc

README

PortShellCrypter -- PSC

This project - as well as its sister project crash - belongs to my anti-censorship tool-set that allows to setup fully working encrypted shells and TCP/UDP forwarding in hostile censoring environments. It is also useful for forensics to dump data from devices via UART or adb when no other means are available.

asciicast DNS lookup and SSH session forwarded across an UART connection to a Pi

PSC allows to e2e encrypt shell sessions, single- or multip-hop, being agnostic of the underlying transport, as long as it is reliable and can send/receive Base64 encoded data without modding/filtering. Along with the e2e pty that you receive (for example inside a port-shell), you can forward TCP and UDP connections, similar to OpenSSH's -L parameter. This works transparently and without the need of an IP address assigned locally at the starting point. This allows forensicans and pen-testers to create network connections for example via:

  • UART sessions to a device
  • adb shell sessions, if the OEM adbd doesn't support TCP forwarding
  • telnet sessions
  • modem dial-ups without ppp
  • other kinds of console logins
  • mixed SSH/telnet/modem sessions
  • ...

Just imagine you would have an invisible ppp session inside your shell session, without the remote peer actually supporting ppp.

It runs on Linux, Android, OSX, Windows, FreeBSD, NetBSD and (possibly) OpenBSD.

PSC also includes SOCKS4 and SOCKS5 proxy support in order to have actual web browsing sessions via port-shells or modem dial-ups remotely.

Build

Edit the Makefile to reflect your pre shared keys, as defined at the top of the Makefile.

Then just type make on Linux and OSX.

On BSD you need to install GNU make and invoke gmake instead.

On Windows you need to install cygwin and select the appropriate gcc, gcc-g++, make and git packages.

On Linux, PSC will use Unix98 pseudo terminals, on other systems it will use POSIX pty's but that should be transparent to you. I once added 4.4BSD pty and SunOS support back in the stone age for a particular reason, so it may or may not build even with Solaris.

proudly sponsored by:

<p align="center"> <a href="https://github.com/c-skills/welcome"> <img src="https://github.com/c-skills/welcome/blob/master/logo.jpg"/> </a> </p>

Usage

Plain and simple. On your local box, execute pscl, and pass any TCP or UDP ports you want to forward from the remote site to a particular address. For example:

linux:~ > ./pscl -T 1234:[192.168.0.254]:22 -U 1234:[8.8.8.8]:53

PortShellCrypter [pscl] v0.60 (C) 2006-2020 stealth -- github.com/stealth/psc

pscl: set up local TCP port 1234 to proxy to 192.168.0.254:22 @ remote.
pscl: set up local UDP port 1234 to proxy to 8.8.8.8:53 @ remote.

pscl: Waiting for [pscr] session to appear ...
linux:~ >

[ UART / SSH / ... login to remote side ... ]

On the remote site (the last hop) with the shell session, no matter if its in a port-shell, SSH, console login etc, you execute pscr:

linux:~ > ./pscr

PortShellCrypter [pscr] v0.60 (C) 2006-2020 stealth -- github.com/stealth/psc


pscl: Seen STARTTLS sequence, enabling crypto.
linux:~ >

Once you execute pscr, both ends establish a crypto handshake and lay an additional protocol over your existing session that is transparent for you. You can then connect to 127.0.0.1:1234 on your local box to reach 192.168.0.254:22 via TCP or the 8.8.8.8 resolver via UDP. This also works with [IPv6] addresses, if the remote site has IPv6 connectivity. Actually, you can even use it to translate IPv4 software to IPv6, since you always connect to 127.0.0.1 on the local side.

You can pass multiple -T and -U parameters. If you lost track if your session is already e2e encrypted, you can send a SIGUSR1 to the local pscl process, and it will tell you.

PSC is also useful if you want to use tor from a remote SSH shell, where you can forward the socks5 and the DNS port to the remote hosts 127.0.0.1 address. Since SSH does not forward UDP packets, you would normally use two socat connectors or similar to resolve via the tor node. PSC has the advantage of keeping the UDP datagram boundaries, while socat over SSH -L may break datagram boundaries and create malformed DNS requests.

The session will be encrypted with aes_256_ctr of a PSK that you choose in the Makefile. This crypto scheme is malleable, but adding AAD or OAD data blows up the packet size, where every byte counts since on interactive sessions and due to Base64 encoding, each typed character already causes much more data to be sent.

UART sessions may be used via screen but for example not via minicom since minicom will create invisible windows with status lines and acts like a filter that destroys PSC's protocol. PSC tries to detect filtering and can live with certain amount of data mangling, but in some situations it is not possible to recover. Similar thing with tmux. You should avoid stacking pty handlers with PSC that mess/handle their incoming data too much.

The SHELL environment variable needs to be set for both pscl and pscr in order for PSC to know which shell to execute on the pty. SHELL is set in most environments by default, but in case it isn't, PSC needs to be executed like SHELL=/bin/bash pscl etc.

SOCKS4 and SOCKS5 support

pscl also supports forwarding of TCP connections via SOCKS4 (-4 port) and SOCKS5 (-5 port). This sets up port as SOCKS port for TCP connections, so for instance you can browse remote networks from a port-shell session without the need to open any other connection during a pen-test. If you pass -N to pscl, it enables DNS name resolution on the remote side, so you can also use chrome with it. But be warned: There is a privacy problem with browsers that try to resolve a sequence of DNS names upon startup that is not under your control. Also, if your remote side has a broken DNS setup, your typing shell may block for several seconds if DNS reply packets are missing. There are no good async resolver functions which are embeddable and portable so I had to rely on getaddrinfo() in the single thread at the price of possible blockings for several seconds if DNS problems exist. Thats why name resolving has to be enabled explicitly. pscr tries to minimize this potential problem with DNS lookup caches though, so in most situation it should just work painlessly. If you pass -X IP-address (must be the first argument), you can bind your local proxy to an address different from 127.0.0.1, so you can share the proxy in your local network.

Bounce commands

psc features allow TCP-connections or binary data blobs being forwarded from/to remote devices across multiple hops even if it is not possible to install the pscr binary at the remote site. This is very useful for forensic purposes if you do not have any means to otherwise download artefacts from the device (which can be an UART connected phone for example) or need to forward connections without touching the FS to not destroy evidence on the system or when the root-FS is ro mounted and you can't upload your tool-set.

This is a really cool feature, as you can see your TCP connection hop through your local tty to a remote box without the need to install anything remotely.

This solely works by local pty punkrock and handing over a bounce-command to pscl that it will drop on the remote shell (without pscr running) and some state engine magic that filters out and handles the data at the local side. Usually this requires to set the remote pty to raw mode at first before issuing the actual command and some other details that are passed to -B. The argument is split into the following parts:

  • The local port to trigger the command upon connect, followed by :, e.g. 1234:.
  • The cmd that sets the remote tty to raw mode, usually stty -echo raw or python -c "import tty;tty.setraw(0)" (take care to get the quotes right, as -B also needs to be quoted) or anything similar.
  • A "GO" marker issued by remote that tells pscl to start sending data to avoid a race between stty actually happen and the start of the cmd, e.g. a echo GO is perfect.
  • The trigger command itself, e.g. nc 127.0.0.1 22 to bounce local port 1234 to remote's SSH server
  • optionally a FIN marker issued by remote so you notice that trigger command has been finished i.e. you can kill your local connection to port 1234, which allows pscl to reset its tty state. echo FIN will do it. Recommended, as otherwise you can have trouble recognizing the end of your command.
  • All four previous commands are separated by ; and enclosed in brackets.

Examples:

If you want to forward a TCP connection, this example requires stty and nc installed on the device, but it could theoretically be anything else that does equivalent.

Start a local session:

./pscl -B '1234:[stty -echo raw;echo GO;nc example.com 22;echo FIN]'

This will issue the command stty -echo raw;echo GO;nc example.com 22;echo FIN to the remote device if you connect locally to port 1234 and then just forwards any data it sees back and forth and rate-limiting the traffic so it will not exceed the devices' tty speed (115200 is the default).

When the pscl session is started, connect to the remote device by UART, ssh -e none ... or whatever it is and once you have the remote shell, also type locally:

ssh root@127.0.0.1 -p 1234 to bounce the SSH connection from your local box across the remote device to the example.com destination. Of course the pscr variant is preferred as -B can only bounce a single connection at a time (although you can pass multiple -B commands for various forwards) and theres a c

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars132
CategoryDevelopment
Updated1mo ago
Forks25

Languages

C++

Security Score

85/100

Audited on Jan 31, 2026

No findings