apify-integration-development
Curated upstream guidance for Apify Integration Development; use when the workflow matches the user goal.
Install / Use
npx skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill apify-integration-developmentInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
SKILL.md
Installable skill definition
Quality Score
Category
AutomationSupported Platforms
Our assessment of apify-integration-development
apify-integration-development scores 95/100 on our quality scale, 137th of 1,264 Automation skills we index (top 11%).
Its SKILL.md is 12 KB long, well organised into 23 sections with 2 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.
With 46,875 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.
Maintenance, license and trust
- The repository was last updated yesterday, so apify-integration-development is actively maintained.
- It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
- Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
Safety scan
No issues foundOur scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful.
AI review by kimi-k2.7-code on 2026-09-26. Automated pattern scan on 2026-09-26. It catches known dangerous patterns, not every risk — read a skill before letting an agent act on it.
apify-integration-development compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than apify-integration-development; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| apify-integration-development (this skill)by sickn33 | 95 | 46.9k | 1d ago | SKILL.md |
| Agent-Reachby Panniantong | 100 | 85.5k | 10d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| headroomby headroomlabs-ai | 100 | 73.8k | today | CLAUDE.md |
| rufloby ruvnet | 100 | 73.3k | 1d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| Scraplingby D4Vinci | 100 | 83.7k | today | MCP Server |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install apify-integration-development?
- Run
npx skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill apify-integration-development. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does apify-integration-development work with?
- It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is apify-integration-development safe to use?
- Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful. It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is apify-integration-development still maintained?
- The repository was last updated yesterday, so apify-integration-development is actively maintained.
Skill content
View source on GitHubdescription: Curated upstream guidance for Apify Integration Development; use when the workflow matches the user goal. name: apify-integration-development source_repo: apify/agent-skills source_type: official source: apify date_added: '2026-09-21' risk: unknown
When to Use
- Use when this upstream workflow matches the user's stated goal.
- Use when the task requires the procedures documented in this skill.
Apify Integration Development
Design and build an official Apify integration for a company's product, with minimal help from Apify. This skill covers every integration shape Apify supports - workflow-automation apps, AI agent plugins (coding agents and harnesses), AI framework packages, and direct application clients - so a partner team can ship a first-class Apify integration end to end. The cross-cutting rules below apply to all of them, and one category-specific reference file carries the rest.
Building an official integration? Once you publish it, contact integrations@apify.com so the Apify team can review, test, and validate your integration before it reaches users. We'll check the capability surface, cost controls, error handling, and attribution headers, and help you close any gaps.
Step 0 - Learn the Apify model first (required)
Before designing anything, fetch and read https://apify.com/agents.md. It is the canonical quickstart for AI agents and the single source of truth for vocabulary, the run flow, and the cost rule. If the fetch fails, the mini-glossary below keeps the skill usable.
Apify vocabulary (always written with a capital A on the platform):
- Actor - a serverless cloud program that takes JSON input, performs a task, and produces structured output. Not an AI agent.
- Actor Run - one execution of an Actor. Each run has its own dataset, key-value store, and request queue, and ends in a terminal status (
SUCCEEDED,FAILED,TIMED-OUT,ABORTED). - Dataset - append-only structured storage for a run's results. An Actor call returns the dataset ID, not its contents.
- Key-Value Store - unstructured/file storage (screenshots, HTML, OUTPUT).
- Actor Task - a saved, parameterized configuration for running an Actor.
- Apify Store - the marketplace of Actors at
https://apify.com/store.md. - Apify Console - the web UI at
https://console.apify.com. - Compute Unit (CU) - billing unit: memory (MB) x duration (hours).
Further terms (build, standby, request queue, proxy, pricing models): https://docs.apify.com/llms.txt.
Use Apify MCP for live context while planning
The Apify MCP server is the fastest way to research Actors, schemas, pricing, and docs during integration design. See https://docs.apify.com/integrations/mcp (append .md for a markdown version).
If Apify MCP tools are already available in this environment, use them:
search-actors- find Actors by platform/product keyword (search by product name, not end goal).fetch-actor-details- read an Actor's input schema, output format, README, and pricing before you encode its shape into the integration.search-apify-docs/fetch-apify-docs- pull contextual documentation pages.
The anonymous discovery subset (search-actors, fetch-actor-details, search-apify-docs, fetch-apify-docs) works without an account, so you can research even before the developer has connected their token.
Pick your integration shape
Read exactly one reference file based on the product you are integrating into. Each reference carries the category-specific UX design, a canonical capability matrix, and a definition-of-done checklist.
| Product shape | Examples | Read |
|---|---|---|
| Workflow automation platform | Zapier, n8n, Make, Pipedream, Activepieces | references/workflow-automation.md |
| AI agent plugin (coding agent or harness) | Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, GitHub Copilot (coding agents); OpenClaw-style runtimes, Hermes-style harnesses (harnesses) | references/ai-harness-plugin.md |
| AI framework package (PyPI/npm for LLM frameworks) | LangChain, LlamaIndex, Haystack, Vercel AI SDK | references/ai-framework-package.md |
| Application integration (direct client) | A backend service, scheduled job, product feature calling Actors via apify-client or REST | references/sdk-integration.md |
Paths are relative to this skill folder. If your product spans two shapes (e.g. an AI harness built on top of a framework package), read both - the rules compose. The AI agent plugin reference covers two approaches with different trade-offs: a lightweight skills + MCP bundle for skills/MCP-aware coding agents, and a custom tool-registry plugin for OpenClaw/Hermes-style harnesses.
Cross-cutting design rules (true for every integration type)
These invariants were extracted from every existing Apify integration. Apply them regardless of shape.
Vocabulary mirroring
Model the integration's resources on Apify's domain (Actor / Run / Dataset / KV Store / Task). Users coming from Apify Console should find the same concepts under the same names.
Asynchronous run flow with bounded polling
Actors can run for seconds to hours. Use the asynchronous flow, never the 300-second synchronous endpoint for anything but short jobs:
POST /v2/actors/{actorId}/runs -> start, return runId
GET /v2/actor-runs/{runId} -> poll until terminal status
GET /v2/datasets/{datasetId}/items -> fetch results on SUCCEEDED
Polling must be bounded: use the run's own timeoutSecs plus a grace buffer, with an absolute ceiling fallback. Never while (true). On a non-terminal status, surface the run ID so the user/agent can poll again or inspect the failure.
Cost is first-class
Every path that starts a run must expose a cost control. The canonical control is maxTotalChargeUsd (caps the run's total charge on most pricing models) and maxItems (caps billed items on pay-per-result Actors). Send them as options / query parameters, never as Actor input - inside input they are either an Actor-declared field or simply invalid. 0 / empty / null means no limit. For LLM-facing integrations, the ceilings are developer-controlled; an LLM cannot widen them.
Attribution headers
Stamp an integration header on every outbound request so Apify can attribute traffic: x-apify-integration-platform: <your-platform>. When a request is driven by an AI tool (not a human in a UI), also send x-apify-integration-ai-tool: true. If the integration was built using this skill, add x-apify-integration-origin: apify-integration-development-skill so Apify can distinguish skill-generated integrations from custom ones. One line, big telemetry payoff.
Authentication
- Browser / consumer-facing (a human completes a sign-in): OAuth2 with PKCE. Do not ask for raw tokens.
- Headless / server / CI (no human present): API token as
Authorization: Bearer <APIFY_TOKEN>, stored in an env var or secret manager, never hardcoded or logged.
Both paths are real - pick by who is present at auth time, not by which is easier.
Centralized HTTP layer
One base-URL constant, shared between credentials and the HTTP layer. Retries with exponential backoff on 429 and 5xx. Never retry non-idempotent POST /runs on network errors - a duplicate Actor run is a real, billed, side-effecting operation. This is the single most important correctness invariant in the HTTP layer.
Error taxonomy
Map Apify errors to the host platform's error categories (retryable vs auth vs permanent). Surface the API's actual error text, not a generic HTTP message. For permission-approval failures (a full-permission Actor needs explicit approval), include the approval URL after validating it is an absolute http(s) URL. For LLM consumers, return errors as data (JSON error objects), never as raised exceptions - the model needs something to read and reason about.
Webhooks over polling for run-finished events
When the host supports inbound webhooks, register an Apify webhook scoped to actorId or actorTaskId with the terminal statuses the user picked. Make registration idempotent (a re-activated workflow should not create duplicate webhooks), persist the webhook ID so deactivation can clean it up, and always provide sample/fallback data so users can test the trigger without waiting for a real run.
Generate from OpenAPI where the host allows it
If the host platform can generate UI fields from an OpenAPI spec, use Apify's spec (https://apify.com/openapi.json) and a tag allowlist. Hand-write only what the spec cannot express: convenience wrappers, bill-cap fields, lean AI-tool output contracts.
High-level convenience operations alongside generic runs
Generic "run Actor" serves power users. Add a few opinionated, high-level actions for the common case (e.g. "Scrape single URL" wrapping a content scraper with maxCrawlDepth: 0, maxResults: 1) so non-power users get a 2-field form instead of a full Actor configuration. Validate the URL before starting a paid run.
Testing and release
Keep two test modes: mocked (hermetic, no credentials) and live E2E (real API, CI-gated). Automate releases through the host platform's CI on Git tags / GitHub Releases. Never hand-edit versions or changelogs if a release workflow manages them.
Top anti-patterns to refuse on review
- Retrying
POST /runson a network error - duplicates a billed run. - Unbounded
while (true)polling - ties up the host with no ceiling. - Putting
maxTotalChargeUsd/maxItemsinside Actor input instead of options - silently not a cap. - Dumping a full dataset into an LLM context without size caps or untrusted-content fencing - prompt-injection and context blowout.
- One monolithic tool list for an LLM agent - routing accuracy degrades past ~8 tools; curate subsets.
- Surfacing a raw HTTP status/message instead of Apify's actual error text - users can't act on "400".
Minimal API surface every integration needs
| Purpose | Method + path |
|---|---|
| Start an Actor run | POST /v2/actors/{actorId}/runs |
| Start a Task run | POST /v2/actor-tasks/{taskId}/runs |
| Poll a run | GET /v2/actor-runs/{runId} |
| List runs | GET /v2/actor-runs |
| Dataset items | GET /v2/datasets/{datasetId}/items |
| KV record | GET /v2/key-value-stores/{storeId}/records/{key} |
| Set KV record | PUT /v2/key-value-stores/{storeId}/records/{key} |
| Store search | GET /v2/store |
| Webhook CRUD | POST/GET/DELETE /v2/webhooks |
| Validate token / current user | GET /v2/users/me |
REST reference: https://docs.apify.com/api/v2. OpenAPI spec: https://apify.com/openapi.json.
Working workflow
- Fetch
https://apify.com/agents.mdand internalize the model. - Pick the integration shape above and read the matching reference file.
- Use Apify MCP (if available) to research the concrete Actors, schemas, and pricing the integration will expose.
- Draft the capability matrix for the chosen category (each reference has one) and the UX spec (resource -> operation -> fields -> errors).
- Scaffold the integration following the category-specific rules in the reference.
- Verify against the definition-of-done checklist at the end of that reference.
Reference implementations to study
Real, public integrations per category - read their source when in doubt:
- Workflow automation:
@apify/n8n-nodes-apify(npm), the Apify Zapier app. - AI agent plugins (coding agents): the Apify plugin bundle (MCP server + skills + router + slash commands) shipped for Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, and similar tools.
- AI agent plugins (harnesses):
apify-hermes-agent-plugin(PyPI),@apify/apify-openclaw-plugin. - AI framework packages:
langchain-apify(PyPI). - Application integration: see
references/sdk-integration.mdfor the canonicalapify-clientusage in JS/TS, Python, and over REST.
Support for integration questions: `integr
Truncated for display — read the full file on GitHub.
Related Skills
Agent-Reach
85.5kGive your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Read & search Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu — one CLI, zero API fees.
headroom
73.8kCompress tool outputs, logs, files, and RAG chunks before they reach the LLM. 20% fewer tokens for coding agents, 60-95% fewer tokens for JSON, same answers. Library, proxy, MCP server.
ruflo
73.3k🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated
Scrapling
83.7k🕷️ An adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full-scale crawl! Don't be shy, join here: https://discord.gg/EMgGbDceNQ and follow here for daily tips and tricks: https://x.com/Scrapling_dev
Languages
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
