Tgc
A Tiny Garbage Collector for C
Install / Use
/learn @orangeduck/TgcREADME
Tiny Garbage Collector
About
tgc is a tiny garbage collector for C written in ~500 lines of code and based
on the Cello Garbage Collector.
#include "tgc.h"
static tgc_t gc;
static void example_function() {
char *message = tgc_alloc(&gc, 64);
strcpy(message, "No More Memory Leaks!");
}
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
tgc_start(&gc, &argc);
example_function();
tgc_stop(&gc);
}
Usage
tgc is a conservative, thread local, mark and sweep garbage collector,
which supports destructors, and automatically frees memory allocated by
tgc_alloc and friends after it becomes unreachable.
A memory allocation is considered reachable by tgc if...
- a pointer points to it, located on the stack at least one function call
deeper than the call to
tgc_start, or, - a pointer points to it, inside memory allocated by
tgc_allocand friends.
Otherwise a memory allocation is considered unreachable.
Therefore some things that don't qualify an allocation as reachable are, if...
- a pointer points to an address inside of it, but not at the start of it, or,
- a pointer points to it from inside the
staticdata segment, or, - a pointer points to it from memory allocated by
malloc,calloc,reallocor any other non-tgcallocation methods, or, - a pointer points to it from a different thread, or,
- a pointer points to it from any other unreachable location.
Given these conditions, tgc will free memory allocations some time after
they become unreachable. To do this it performs an iteration of mark and
sweep when tgc_alloc is called and the number of memory allocations exceeds
some threshold. It can also be run manually with tgc_run.
Memory allocated by tgc_alloc can be manually freed with tgc_free, and
destructors (functions to be run just before memory is freed), can be
registered with tgc_set_dtor.
Reference
void tgc_start(tgc_t *gc, void *stk);
Start the garbage collector on the current thread, beginning at the stack
location given by the stk variable. Usually this can be found using the
address of any local variable, and then the garbage collector will cover all
memory at least one function call deeper.
void tgc_stop(tgc_t *gc);
Stop the garbage collector and free its internal memory.
void tgc_run(tgc_t *gc);
Run an iteration of the garbage collector, freeing any unreachable memory.
void tgc_pause(tgc_t *gc);
void tgc_resume(tgc_t *gc);
Pause or resume the garbage collector. While paused the garbage collector will not run during any allocations made.
void *tgc_alloc(gc_t *gc, size_t size);
Allocate memory via the garbage collector to be automatically freed once it becomes unreachable.
void *tgc_calloc(gc_t *gc, size_t num, size_t size);
Allocate memory via the garbage collector and initalise it to zero.
void *tgc_realloc(gc_t *gc, void *ptr, size_t size);
Reallocate memory allocated by the garbage collector.
void tgc_free(gc_t *gc, void *ptr);
Manually free an allocation made by the garbage collector. Runs any destructor if registered.
void *tgc_alloc_opt(tgc_t *gc, size_t size, int flags, void(*dtor)(void*));
Allocate memory via the garbage collector with the given flags and destructor.
For the flags argument, the flag TGC_ROOT may be specified to indicate that
the allocation is a garbage collection root and so should not be
automatically freed and instead will be manually freed by the user with
tgc_free. Because roots are not automatically freed, they can exist in
normally unreachable locations such as in the static data segment or in
memory allocated by malloc.
The flag TGC_LEAF may be specified to indicate that the allocation is a
garbage collection leaf and so contains no pointers to other allocations
inside. This can benefit performance in many cases. For example, when
allocating a large string there is no point the garbage collector scanning
this allocation - it can take a long time and doesn't contain any pointers.
Otherwise the flags argument can be set to zero.
The dtor argument lets the user specify a destructor function to be run
just before the memory is freed. Destructors have many uses, for example they
are often used to automatically release system resources (such as file handles)
when a data structure is finished with them. For no destructor the value NULL
can be used.
void *tgc_calloc_opt(tgc_t *gc, size_t num, size_t size, int flags, void(*dtor)(void*));
Allocate memory via the garbage collector with the given flags and destructor and initalise to zero.
void tgc_set_dtor(tgc_t *gc, void *ptr, void(*dtor)(void*));
Register a destructor function to be called after the memory allocation ptr
becomes unreachable, and just before it is freed by the garbage collector.
void tgc_set_flags(tgc_t *gc, void *ptr, int flags);
Set the flags associated with a memory allocation, for example the value
TGC_ROOT can be used to specify that an allocation is a garbage collection
root.
int tgc_get_flags(tgc_t *gc, void *ptr);
Get the flags associated with a memory allocation.
void(*tgc_get_dtor(tgc_t *gc, void *ptr))(void*);
Get the destructor associated with a memory allocation.
size_t tgc_get_size(tgc_t *gc, void *ptr);
Get the size of a memory allocation.
F.A.Q
Is this real/safe/portable?
Definitely! While there is no way to create a completely safe/portable garbage collector in C this collector doesn't use any platform specific tricks and only makes the most basic assumptions about the platform, such as that the architecture using a continuous call stack to implement function frames.
It should be safe to use for more or less all reasonable architectures found
in the wild and has been tested on Linux, Windows, and OSX, where it was easily
integrated into several large real world programs (see examples) such as
bzip2 and oggenc without issue.
Saying all of that, there are the normal warnings - this library performs undefined behaviour as specified by the C standard and so you use it at your own risk - there is no guarantee that something like a compiler or OS update wont mysteriously break it.
What happens when some data just happens to look like a pointer?
In this unlikely case tgc will treat the data as a pointer and assume that
the memory allocation it points to is still reachable. If this is causing your
application trouble by not allowing a large memory allocation to be freed
consider freeing it manually with tgc_free.
tgc isn't working when I increment pointers!
Due to the way tgc works, it always needs a pointer to the start of each
memory allocation to be reachable. This can break algorithms such as the
following, which work by incrementing a pointer.
void bad_function(char *y) {
char *x = tgc_alloc(&gc, strlen(y) + 1);
strcpy(x, y);
while (*x) {
do_some_processsing(x);
x++;
}
}
Here, when x is incremented, it no longer points to the start of the memory
allocation made by tgc_alloc. Then during do_some_processing, if a sweep
is performed, x will be declared as unreachable and the memory freed.
If the pointer x is also stored elsewhere such as inside a heap structure
there is no issue with incrementing a copy of it - so most of the time you
don't need to worry, but occasionally you may need to adjust algorithms which
do significant pointer arithmetic. For example, in this case the pointer can be
left as-is and an integer used to index it instead:
void good_function(char *y) {
int i;
char *x = tgc_alloc(&gc, strlen(y) + 1);
strcpy(x, y);
for (i = 0; i < strlen(x); i++) {
do_some_processsing(&x[i]);
}
}
For now this is the behaviour of tgc until I think of a way to
deal with offset pointers nicely.
tgc isn't working when optimisations are enabled!
Variables are only considered reachable if they are one function call shallower
than the call to tgc_start. If optimisations are enabled sometimes the
compiler will inline functions which removes this one level of indirection.
The most portable way to get compilers not to inline functions is to call them
through volatile function pointers.
static tgc_t gc;
void please_dont_inline(void) {
...
}
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
tgc_start(&gc, &argc);
void (*volatile func)(void) = please_dont_inline;
func();
tgc_stop(&gc);
return 1;
}
tgc isn't working with setjmp and longjmp!
Unfortunately tgc doesn't work properly with setjmp and longjmp since
these functions can cause complex stack behaviour. One simple option is to
disable the garbage collector while using these functions and to re-enable
it afterwards.
Why do I get uninitialised values warnings with Valgrind?
The garbage collector scans the stack memory and this naturally contains
uninitialised values. It scans memory safely, but if you are running through
Valgrind these accesses will be reported as warnings/errors. Other than this
tgc shouldn't have any memory errors in Valgrind, so the easiest way to
disable these to examine any real problems is to run Valgrind with the option
--undef-value-errors=no.
Is tgc fast?
At the moment tgc has decent performance - it is competative with many
existing memory management systems - but definitely can't claim to be the
fastest garbage collector on the market. Saying that, there is a fair amount of
low hanging fruit for anyone interested in optimising it - so some potential to
be faster exists.
How it Works
For a basic mark and sweep garbage collector two th
