start
Start or resume an Elixir rewrite of an app in any language (Rails, Django, PHP, Node, Go, Java, .NET, others) and show its status
Install / Use
npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill startInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
SKILL.md
Installable skill definition
Quality Score
Category
AutomationSupported Platforms
Tags
Our assessment of start
start scores 90/100 on our quality scale, 1199th of 2,864 Automation skills we index (top 42%).
Its SKILL.md is 6.2 KB long, well organised into 10 sections with 6 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.
It has 571 GitHub stars, a meaningful sign that others use it.
Maintenance, license and trust
- The repository was last updated 6 days ago, so start is actively maintained.
- It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
- Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
start compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than start; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| start (this skill)by oliver-kriska | 90 | 571 | 6d ago | SKILL.md |
| Agent-Reachby Panniantong | 100 | 105.0k | 3d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| Scraplingby D4Vinci | 100 | 90.1k | 1d ago | MCP Server |
| rufloby ruvnet | 100 | 79.9k | today | MCP Server |
| algorithmic-artby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 35d ago | SKILL.md |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install start?
- Run
npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill start. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does start work with?
- It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is start safe to use?
- It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is start still maintained?
- The repository was last updated 6 days ago, so start is actively maintained.
Skill content
View source on GitHubname: start description: "Start or resume an Elixir rewrite of an app in any language (Rails, Django, PHP, Node, Go, Java, .NET, others) and show its status. Use when someone wants to port, migrate or rewrite an app into Elixir/Phoenix." effort: medium argument-hint: "[<legacy-app-path>] [--steering <dir>] [--oracle <dir>] [--status] [--auto]"
Rewrite Start — Entry, Resume, Status
The front door of the rewrite workflow. It explains the method once, finds where an existing rewrite stands, checks that the legacy source has not changed underneath it, and routes to the next phase.
/rewrite:start → /rewrite:analyze → /rewrite:architect → /rewrite:roadmap
↓ per slice
/rewrite:verify ← /phx:work ← /phx:plan
Iron Laws
- ONE PHASE AT A TIME — route to the next phase; with
--auto, chain only analyze → architect → roadmap - IDENTITY BEFORE RESUME — compare the source snapshot before trusting earlier artifacts
- STATE COMES FROM FILES — read
.claude/rewrite/and the ledger script, never memory of a previous session --autoSTOPS AT DECISIONS — it never approves ASSUMED choices, never starts/phx:work, never deploys or touches production data- LEGACY STAYS READ-ONLY — never write into or execute the source app
Workflow
1. Check dependencies and detect state
If the phx:plan skill is not in this session's skill list, tell the user to
install elixir-phoenix from the marketplace that provided rewrite
(/plugin install elixir-phoenix@oliver-kriska, or that marketplace's
name), then run /reload-plugins. Without it the architect consults and
the /phx:plan handoff fail, so --auto stops after analyze.
ls .claude/rewrite/ .claude/rewrite/architecture/ 2>/dev/null && sed -n '1,40p' .claude/rewrite/status.md
python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../architect/scripts/ledger.py" check --rewrite-dir .claude/rewrite # once architecture.md exists
Read the first matching row, top to bottom. An active slice comes before seeding a new one:
| Found | State | Next |
|-------|-------|------|
| nothing | new | step 2, then /rewrite:analyze <path> |
| phase analyzing, or an analysis/*.md missing | analyze incomplete | /rewrite:analyze <Source path> |
| analysis/*.md, no ADR-000 | analyzed | /rewrite:architect |
| ADR-000, no architecture.md | architect incomplete | /rewrite:architect (resumes at step 4) |
| ADR-000 + architecture.md, but decisions.md or divergences.md missing, phase architecting, or ledger.py check fails | architect incomplete | /rewrite:architect (resumes at step 4 or 5) |
| ADR-000 + architecture.md + decisions.md + divergences.md, clean ledger, no roadmap.md | architected | /rewrite:roadmap |
| a slice planned or in-progress whose plan.md has at least one - [x] and no - [ ] | awaiting gate | /rewrite:verify NN |
| a slice planned or in-progress | building | /phx:work .claude/plans/{slug}/plan.md, then /rewrite:verify NN |
| roadmap.md with ready or seeded slices | slicing | /rewrite:roadmap --next |
| every slice done | complete | release rehearsal slice, or close out |
2. New rewrite: explain once, then analyze
In five lines or fewer, tell the user how this works: features are goals,
every mechanism's purpose is recovered before it is ported, the
compatibility bar comes before architecture, slices go to /phx:plan, and
parity needs evidence. Then run /rewrite:analyze with the path (ask for it
if missing). The artifacts go to ./.claude/rewrite/ in the current
directory; that must be the Elixir project or an empty workspace, not the
legacy app.
3. Resume: check identity
SOURCE=$(sed -n 's/^Source path: //p' .claude/rewrite/status.md)
TARGET=$(sed -n 's/^Target path: //p' .claude/rewrite/status.md); [ "$(pwd -P)" = "$TARGET" ]
python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../analyze/scripts/inventory.py" "$SOURCE" \
--compare .claude/rewrite/inventory/inventory.json
Stop and name Target path when the cwd differs. Exit 1 from --compare
lists the changed identity fields. For a git source, show what changed
since the recorded sha:
git -C "$SOURCE" diff --stat {recorded_sha}..HEAD
Ask whether to re-analyze the changed areas (/rewrite:analyze --scope …).
Mark evidence stale for ledger rows whose anchors fall in changed files.
4. Status (--status, or always on resume)
python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../architect/scripts/ledger.py" stats --rewrite-dir .claude/rewrite
grep -E "^\| [0-9]{2}[a-z]? " .claude/rewrite/roadmap.md
Show: phase, ADR-000 status (accepted or ASSUMED), ledger verified-of- denominator with UNDECIDED and accepted-risk counts, slices by state, pending divergences, and the single next command.
5. --auto chain
Run /rewrite:analyze <path> --auto (passing any --steering or --oracle), then /rewrite:architect --auto,
then /rewrite:roadmap --auto, each via the Skill tool from this session.
Stop early when a phase reports a blocker. End with the list of ASSUMED
decisions the user must approve and the next command; /phx:plan runs only
when no consequential decision is ASSUMED or pending.
Headless or CI runs (claude -p) stop background agents 10 minutes after
the last turn. Lift that ceiling for the whole chain:
CLAUDE_CODE_PRINT_BG_WAIT_CEILING_MS=0 claude -p "/rewrite:start /path/to/legacy --auto"
Artifacts (.claude/rewrite/)
| Path | Written by |
|------|------------|
| status.md, charter.md, inventory/, kb/, analysis/ (incl. budget.md) | analyze |
| ledger.md, architecture/ (ADR-000-compatibility-bar.md, architecture.md, decisions.md, divergences.md, adr/, consults/) | architect |
| roadmap.md, ../plans/rewrite-NN-*/interview.md + scratchpad.md | roadmap |
| verify/NN/ (preflight, evidence, idiom, parity, report), verify/accepted-risks.md | verify (risks: user only) |
Arguments
<legacy-app-path>— the app to rewrite (new rewrites)--steering <dir>,--oracle <dir>— passed to analyze: docs that steer it, and a test or API suite outside the app (read and graded, never run)--status— report only--auto— chain analyze → architect → roadmap without questions; defaults recorded as ASSUMED
Related Skills
Agent-Reach
105.0kGive your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Read & search Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu — one CLI, zero API fees.
Scrapling
90.1k🕷️ The BEST Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full-scale crawl! Don't be shy, join here: https://discord.gg/EMgGbDceNQ and follow here for daily tips and tricks: https://x.com/Scrapling_dev
ruflo
79.9k🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated
algorithmic-art
177.9kCreating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems.
Languages
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
