phx-work
Execute Elixir/Phoenix plan tasks with progress tracking. Use after phx-plan
Install / Use
npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill phx-workInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
SKILL.md
Installable skill definition
Quality Score
Category
Development & EngineeringSupported Platforms
Tags
Our assessment of phx-work
phx-work scores 85/100 on our quality scale, 2456th of 4,613 Development & Engineering skills we index.
Its SKILL.md is 7.9 KB long, well organised into 13 sections with 3 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.
It has 560 GitHub stars, a meaningful sign that others use it.
Maintenance, license and trust
- The repository was last updated 3 days ago, so phx-work is actively maintained.
- It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
- Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
Safety scan
No issues foundOur scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands.
Automated pattern scan on 2026-10-05. It catches known dangerous patterns, not every risk — read a skill before letting an agent act on it.
phx-work compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than phx-work; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| phx-work (this skill)by oliver-kriska | 85 | 560 | 3d ago | SKILL.md |
| ai-job-searchby MadsLorentzen | 100 | 45.0k | 2d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| claude-howtoby luongnv89 | 100 | 41.8k | 5d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| algorithmic-artby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 13d ago | SKILL.md |
| pptxby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 13d ago | SKILL.md |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install phx-work?
- Run
npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill phx-work. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does phx-work work with?
- It is written for Claude Code, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is phx-work safe to use?
- Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is phx-work still maintained?
- The repository was last updated 3 days ago, so phx-work is actively maintained.
Skill content
View source on GitHubname: phx-work description: Execute Elixir/Phoenix plan tasks with progress tracking. Use after phx-plan to implement features with mix compile and mix test verification after each step, or --continue to resume interrupted work.
Work
Execute tasks from a plan file with checkpoint tracking and verification.
Usage
phx-work .claude/plans/user-auth/plan.md
phx-work .claude/plans/user-auth/plan.md --from P2-T3
phx-work --skip-blockers
phx-work # Resumes most recent plan
Arguments
<plan-file>-- Path to plan file (optional, auto-detects recent)--from <task-id>-- Resume from specific task (e.g.,P2-T3)--skip-blockers-- Continue past blocked tasks--continue-- Resume IN_PROGRESS plan from checkboxes
Iron Laws (NON-NEGOTIABLE)
- NEVER auto-proceed to phx-review or any next workflow phase -- always ask the user what to do next
- AUTO-CONTINUE between plan phases -- when Phase N completes, immediately start Phase N+1. Do NOT stop or ask for permission between phases. Only stop at BLOCKERS or when ALL phases are done.
- Plan checkboxes ARE the state --
[x]= done;[ ]= pending unless the row is visibly tagged[BLOCKED]. No separate JSON state files. Resume by reading the plan. - Verify after EVERY task -- never skip verification
- Max 3 retries then BLOCKER -- don't keep retrying forever
- Stage specific files -- never use
git add -Aorgit add . - Read scratchpad BEFORE implementing -- scratchpad has dead-ends and decisions that prevent rework. Step 2 is not optional.
- Clarify ambiguous tasks -- ask the user rather than guessing when a plan task's intent is unclear
Step 1: Research Decision
Ask the user for plans with >3 tasks:
This plan has {count} remaining tasks across {count} phases.
- Start working -- Begin immediately (familiar patterns)
- Quick research -- Read source files first (~10 min)
- Extensive research -- Web search + docs (~30 min)
Skip for plans with 3 or fewer simple tasks -- just start.
Split warning: Plans with >10 tasks risk 2-3 context compactions. Suggest splitting via
phx-planif not already.
Step 2: Check Context (MANDATORY)
Read scratchpad and compound docs before writing any code — skipping
this causes rework. Read .claude/plans/{slug}/scratchpad.md (short,
critical context) for dead-ends and decisions, then Grep .claude/solutions/
for solved patterns. Apply findings: skip dead-ends, follow decisions,
reuse patterns. Ask the user when a task's intent is ambiguous — never
guess, corrections are expensive.
Step 3: Load, Create Task List, and Resume
Read plan file, count [x] (completed) vs [ ] (remaining).
Select the first unchecked task not tagged [BLOCKED]. Stop if an unresolved
[BLOCKED] task precedes it unless --skip-blockers is explicit.
--skip-blockers skips only tagged blocked rows; --from <blocked-id>
explicitly retries that row and clears [BLOCKED] when starting.
Use the plan file as the portable task list. For every unchecked item,
preserve its - [ ] [Pn-Tm] row and ordering. At the start of a task, set its
phase to [IN_PROGRESS] and append a Started: entry to
.claude/plans/{slug}/progress.md. Mark the plan checkbox [x] only after
verification passes, then append the completion evidence to progress.md.
Dependencies remain explicit in phase order: do not start a later phase while an earlier phase has unchecked non-blocked tasks. This checklist is the progress UI, durable state, and resume mechanism; no runtime task API is required.
With --from P2-T3: Skip to that specific task.
Stale-plan check: if the plan predates this session (file mtime), spot-check 2-3 files it references before executing — assumptions may have drifted.
See references/resume-strategies.md for all resume modes.
Step 4: Execute Tasks
Execute each unchecked task (- [ ] [Pn-Tm][concern] Description):
- Start task: mark its phase
[IN_PROGRESS]and log the start in.claude/plans/{slug}/progress.md - Apply concern guidance from the annotation and its required verification (see
references/execution-guide.md); it never selects a named worker - Implement the task
- Verify:
mix format+mix compile --warnings-as-errors(at phase end, also runmix test <affected>— see tiers below) - Complete task: Mark checkbox
[x]on pass, append implementation note inline, and log verification evidence inprogress.md. Example:- [x] [P1-T3] Add user schema — citext for email, composite index on [user_id, status]This survives context compaction; the plan is re-read on resume. - On failure: retry up to 3 times, then keep the row unchecked and
append
[BLOCKED], optionally mark its phase[BLOCKED], record the blocker inprogress.md, write a DEAD-END to scratchpad, and stop by default. Continue only when--skip-blockerswas explicitly supplied
Parallel groups: Tasks under ### Parallel: may use native generic workers only when independent; otherwise execute them sequentially in the current session. See references/execution-guide.md
for the optional-worker pattern, sequential fallback, and checkpoint flow.
Verification tiers (scoped to minimize redundant runs):
- Per-task:
mix compile --warnings-as-errorsonly andmix format --check-formatted <changed_files> - Per-phase:
mix compile --warnings-as-errors+mix test <affected_files>+mix credo --strict(scope tests:mix test test/path/to_affected_test.exs— NOT full suite) - Per-feature: when Tidewave tools are independently configured and exposed, use a behavioral runtime smoke test; otherwise run a focused repository test and a local/manual smoke check (see execution-guide.md)
- Final gate:
mix test(full suite — run ONCE at the end, not per-phase)
Token efficiency: Write user-facing text for non-obvious decisions
and failures; routine verification passes need no commentary. When
several checkboxes complete together (parallel groups, resume catch-up),
batch them into ONE edit pass — never one Edit call per checkbox.
No hook is assumed. Run mix format explicitly during verification and
mix format --check-formatted <changed_files> before completing each task.
Step 5: Completion
Summarize results, then ask the user a normal conversational question:
Implementation complete! {done}/{total} tasks finished. {count} files modified across {count} phases.
Options: 1. Run review (phx-review) (Recommended),
2. Get a briefing (phx-brief — understand what was built),
3. Create a git commit with the platform's native git workflow, 4. Continue manually.
If any task fixed a non-obvious bug, also mention phx-compound
to capture the solution.
With blockers: list them, offer Replan (phx-plan),
Review first (phx-review), or Handle myself.
If blockers remain, auto-write HANDOFF to scratchpad:
### [HH:MM] HANDOFF: {plan name}
Status: {done}/{total} tasks. Blockers: {list}.
Next: {first unchecked task ID and description}.
Key decisions: {brief list from this session}.
Include context beyond checkboxes for fresh session resume.
Wait for the user's choice before starting phx-review or any other phase.
Step 6: Check for Additional Plans
After completion, use Glob to find other plan files matching
.claude/plans/*/plan.md. If pending plans exist, inform the
user. Do NOT auto-start.
Integration
phx-plan → phx-work (YOU ARE HERE) → phx-review → phx-compound
↑ ASK USER before each transition
References
references/execution-guide.md-- Task routing, parallel execution, verificationreferences/resume-strategies.md-- Resume modes and state persistencereferences/file-formats.md-- Plan and progress file formatsreferences/error-recovery.md-- Error handling and blockersreferences/harness-patterns.md-- Critic-refiner pattern for debugging loops
Related Skills
ai-job-search
45.0kThe job search that runs on your machine. AI job application framework built on Claude Code: evaluate postings, tailor CVs, write cover letters, prep interviews. Fork it and own it.
claude-howto
41.8kA visual, example-driven guide to Claude Code — from basic concepts to advanced agents, with copy-paste templates that bring immediate value.
algorithmic-art
177.9kCreating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems.
pptx
177.9kUse this skill any time a .pptx or .potx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx or .potx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an em…
Languages
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
