SkillAgentSearch skills...

phx-pr-review

'Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review

Install / Use

npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill phx-pr-review

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

84/100

Category

Operations

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of phx-pr-review

phx-pr-review scores 84/100 on our quality scale, 548th of 739 Operations skills we index.

Its SKILL.md is 5.9 KB long, split into 5 sections with 3 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.

It has 560 GitHub stars, a meaningful sign that others use it.

Substance
29/30
Structure
16/20
Description
12/15
Adoption
12/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 3 days ago, so phx-pr-review is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

phx-pr-review compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than phx-pr-review; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
phx-pr-review (this skill)by oliver-kriska845603d agoSKILL.md
Agent-Reachby Panniantong10091.6k20d agoCLAUDE.md
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k13d agoSKILL.md
pptxby anthropics100177.9k13d agoSKILL.md
designby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k14d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install phx-pr-review?
Run npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill phx-pr-review. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does phx-pr-review work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is phx-pr-review safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is phx-pr-review still maintained?
The repository was last updated 3 days ago, so phx-pr-review is actively maintained.

name: phx-pr-review description: 'Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.'

PR Review Response

Inspect unresolved pull-request review threads, triage them read-only by default, and apply only explicitly approved fixes. GitHub mutations are never implied.

Usage

phx-pr-review 42
phx-pr-review 42 --fix
phx-pr-review https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/42 --bots-only
phx-pr-review 42 --no-resolve

Workflow

  1. Resolve the PR number or URL. Prefer a runtime GitHub connector that returns thread IDs and resolved state. Otherwise use this exact gh 2.94-compatible fallback (requires command -v gh and gh auth status):
PR_INPUT="${1:?PR number or URL}"
if [[ "$PR_INPUT" =~ ^https://github.com/([^/]+)/([^/]+)/pull/([0-9]+) ]]; then
  OWNER="${BASH_REMATCH[1]}"; REPO="${BASH_REMATCH[2]}"; PR="${BASH_REMATCH[3]}"
else
  OWNER=$(gh repo view --json owner --jq '.owner.login')
  REPO=$(gh repo view --json name --jq '.name'); PR="$PR_INPUT"
fi
gh api graphql --paginate -F owner="$OWNER" -F repo="$REPO" -F pr="$PR"   -f query='query($owner: String!, $repo: String!, $pr: Int!, $endCursor: String) { repository(owner: $owner, name: $repo) { pullRequest(number: $pr) { reviewThreads(first: 100, after: $endCursor) { nodes { id isResolved isOutdated path line originalLine comments(first: 100) { totalCount nodes { id databaseId body author { login __typename } replyTo { id } } } } pageInfo { hasNextPage endCursor } } } } }'
gh api graphql --paginate -F owner="$OWNER" -F repo="$REPO" -F pr="$PR"   -f query='query($owner: String!, $repo: String!, $pr: Int!, $endCursor: String) { repository(owner: $owner, name: $repo) { pullRequest(number: $pr) { reviews(first: 100, after: $endCursor) { nodes { id state body submittedAt author { login __typename } } pageInfo { hasNextPage endCursor } } } } }'

--paginate binds each returned pageInfo.endCursor to $endCursor. Filter isResolved == false after collecting pages. Preserve thread id, root comment id/databaseId, and author.__typename (not login suffixes). comments(first:100) is nested and is not paginated by the outer command: if comments.totalCount > nodes.length, report the thread as TRUNCATED and fetch every comment page with this exact query. The outer query intentionally omits nested comments.pageInfo so gh --paginate follows only the outer reviewThreads.pageInfo cursor:

gh api graphql --paginate -F threadId="$THREAD_ID"   -f query='query($threadId: ID!, $endCursor: String) { node(id:$threadId) { ... on PullRequestReviewThread { comments(first:100, after:$endCursor) { totalCount nodes { id databaseId body author { login __typename } replyTo { id } } pageInfo { hasNextPage endCursor } } } } }'

Merge all comment pages in API order and deduplicate by GraphQL id (first occurrence wins). Block triage until every truncated thread is complete. Do not substitute issue comments for review threads. 2. Keep only unresolved threads, preserve API order, then group by path and line. With --bots-only, use API actor type rather than a login suffix. Show one row per thread with author, category, outdated state, and proposed action. Review summaries are separate, non-resolvable context. 3. Gate 1 — read-only selection. Always stop after triage for an explicit list of selected thread IDs. Selection authorizes inspection only. --fix permits later edits but approves nothing and never selects every thread. 4. Gate 2 — edit approval. For each selected thread, read current code and propose the exact patch. Obtain explicit edit approval before editing, or record EDIT: NOT APPLICABLE with evidence. Then show the applied diff and run the smallest relevant compile/test check after every code change. 5. Gate 3 — posting approval. Draft a reply only after verification. Outdated means location drift, not addressed: require current code/diff evidence before that disposition. Show the diff, evidence, and exact verified reply, then obtain a separate explicit posting approval before posting. Use a connector mutation when available, or gh api to reply to the root review comment. If posting is unsupported or fails, report NOT POSTED with the reason. 6. Gate 4 — resolution approval. First confirm the post from the API response. Only then request a separate resolution approval. --no-resolve always disables resolution, regardless of any other flag or approval. Use the connector or resolveReviewThread mutation, then confirm returned state. Never claim replied/resolved from a draft or intent. 7. Return thread | action | verification | reply | resolution, changed files, and precise blockers. Paginated review summaries with CHANGES_REQUESTED or an actionable non-empty body are findings even when there are zero inline threads; report them as non-resolvable context and never call that state clean. Do not commit or push.

Generic read-only workers may inspect independent threads when the runtime has them, but named custom agents are not required and sequential same-session processing is complete.

Iron Laws

  1. Triage always stops for explicit thread selection — --fix permits but does not approve edits.
  2. Never post, resolve, dismiss, commit, or push without the required approval.
  3. Never resolve before a successful reply and never fabricate mutation state.
  4. Never claim a fix without a shown diff and successful focused verification.
  5. Scrutinize bot and human findings equally; Iron Laws override suggestions.

References

  • references/response-patterns.md — reply templates and tone
  • references/gh-commands.md — GitHub CLI queries and mutations
  • references/bot-triage.md — bot review triage

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars560
CategoryOperations
Updated3d ago
Forks44

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions
phx-pr-review — Universal Skill: Install & Safety Check | SkillAgent