SkillAgentSearch skills...

deps-vet

Record a vetted Hex package version in hex_vet.exs after a security review — manages the audit ledger, not the scanner. Use to approve a dep after /phx:deps-audit findings or to initialize hex_vet.exs.

Install / Use

npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill deps-vet

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

90/100

Category

Security

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of deps-vet

deps-vet scores 90/100 on our quality scale, 475th of 1,086 Security skills we index (top 44%).

Its SKILL.md is 6.0 KB long, well organised into 14 sections with 4 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.

It has 560 GitHub stars, a meaningful sign that others use it.

Substance
29/30
Structure
20/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
12/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 2 days ago, so deps-vet is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

deps-vet compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than deps-vet; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
deps-vet (this skill)by oliver-kriska905602d agoSKILL.md
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k11d agoSKILL.md
pptxby anthropics100177.9k11d agoSKILL.md
designby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k12d agoSKILL.md
ui-ux-pro-maxby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k12d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install deps-vet?
Run npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill deps-vet. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does deps-vet work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is deps-vet safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is deps-vet still maintained?
The repository was last updated 2 days ago, so deps-vet is actively maintained.

name: deps-vet description: "Record a vetted Hex package version in hex_vet.exs after a security review — manages the audit ledger, not the scanner. Use to approve a dep after /phx:deps-audit findings or to initialize hex_vet.exs." argument-hint: "<pkg> <version> | --seed | --list | --check" effort: medium

Deps Vet — Hex package audit ledger

Review a Hex package version, run Phase 1 supply-chain rules against it, prompt the user for a verdict, append the result to hex_vet.exs (project-root audit ledger). Vetted versions get downgraded to INFO on subsequent /phx:deps-audit runs.

Run this AFTER /phx:deps-audit to clear findings. Run this BEFORE merging a mix.lock PR to certify new versions.

Usage

/phx:deps-vet phoenix 1.7.21      # vet a single package version
/phx:deps-vet --seed              # import curated baseline seed (~30 pkgs)
/phx:deps-vet --list              # show existing ledger entries
/phx:deps-vet --check             # cross-check mix.lock vs ledger

Iron Laws

  1. NEVER auto-approve. Every entry MUST come from an AskUserQuestion confirmation. Drive-by trust ruins the ledger's value.
  2. Lock wins on disagreement. If mix.lock has version X and the ledger vets X-1, emit INFO and treat X as unvetted. Don't silently trust the older entry.
  3. Ledger lives at project root. hex_vet.exs is a first-class security artifact, visible in PR review. Don't move it into .claude/.
  4. Round-trip via inspect/2. When appending, read the file with Code.eval_file/1, mutate the map, and write back via inspect(term, pretty: true, limit: :infinity). Hand-rolled string appends drift over time.
  5. Always show findings before prompting. The user must see what's being vetted. No silent :safe_to_deploy defaults.
  6. Confirmation counts are COMPUTED, never estimated. Any number in an AskUserQuestion (criteria split, new/overwrite/no-op) MUST be derived from the loaded data before prompting — e.g. Enum.frequencies_by(seed.audits, & &1.criteria). Eyeballing the file and approving on wrong numbers corrupts the consent.

Execution flow

Step 1: Locate or seed hex_vet.exs

If hex_vet.exs exists at project root:
    Read it via Code.eval_file/1
Else:
    Write the empty-ledger stub (see ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/hex-vet.md §"Empty ledger")
    Inform user: "Created hex_vet.exs at project root."

Step 2: Branch by mode

  • <pkg> <version> → single-vet path (Step 3-7).
  • --seed → import priv/hex_vet_seed.exs. Before prompting, Code.eval_file/1 the seed and compute (Iron Law #6): the criteria split (Enum.frequencies_by(seed.audits, & &1.criteria)) and, against any existing ledger, exact new / overwrite / no-op counts. Put those computed numbers in the AskUserQuestion. Also state up front that the seed is a provenance baseline, not certification of your current mix.lock (per Iron Law #2, seed versions older than the locked ones stay unvetted). Ask before overwriting existing entries.
  • --list → render the audits table; exit.
  • --check → compare ledger entries with mix.lock; warn on drift. Read the lock via Code.eval_file("mix.lock") with 2>/dev/null — modern locks have quoted keys and emit a found quoted keyword warning per package (tens of KB of noise that gets persisted as an oversized tool result otherwise).

Step 3: Fetch the tarball (single-vet)

Run the deps-audit corpus loader. Cache lives at ~/.cache/phx-deps-audit/corpus/<pkg>/<version>/contents/. Use:

bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../deps-audit/scripts/fetch_tarball.sh \
    <pkg> <version>

Step 4: Run Phase 1 rules

Source the rules from ../deps-audit/references/rules-impl.md. Run run_all_rules over the cached dir. Write findings to a temp vet-findings.jsonl. Set FINDINGS_FILE to override default path.

Step 5: Present findings

Print the findings table per ../deps-audit/references/output-renderer.md. On zero findings: say "No findings — vet from a clean baseline." On any finding: show severity, file, line, snippet inline.

Step 6: Prompt for verdict

Call AskUserQuestion with these 4 options:

  • :safe_to_deploy — full trust; findings investigated and cleared.
  • :safe_to_run — trust in non-production envs only (test deps).
  • :does_not_implement_crypto — Mozilla-style sub-criterion.
  • Skip — defer decision; don't write an entry.

If any finding is BLOCK severity: default-highlight Skip. Require explicit override before writing :safe_to_deploy over a BLOCK.

Step 7: Append to ledger

Read existing hex_vet.exs via Code.eval_file/1. Append the audit map below to :audits. Write back via Code.format_string!(inspect(...)).

%{
  package: "<pkg>",
  version: "<version>",
  criteria: <verdict_atom>,
  reviewer: "<git config user.email>",
  notes: "<user-provided one-liner OR findings summary>",
  reviewed_at: ~D[<today>]
}

Write back via Code.format_string!(inspect(term, pretty: true)). Confirm to user: "Added <pkg> <version> to hex_vet.exs."

Integration

  • Run after /phx:deps-audit to clear vetted findings.
  • Run before merging a mix.lock PR to certify new versions.
  • Run /phx:deps-vet --check to detect ledger drift vs mix.lock.
  • /phx:deps-audit auto-downgrades vetted findings to INFO.
  • policy.block_on_unvetted is enforced by the plugin's deps-audit-gate.sh PreToolUse hook on mix deps.get / mix deps.update.

References

  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/hex-vet.md — schema, parser, lookup
  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/seed.md — --seed flag, curated baseline
  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../deps-audit/references/rules-impl.md — the same rules /phx:deps-audit runs

Out of scope (Phase 3+)

  • Mix task surface — defer mix phx.deps_vet to a separate Hex package phx_deps_vet for non-CC users.
  • Distributed imports — defer cargo-vet imports: until trust-chain semantics are designed.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars560
CategorySecurity
Updated2d ago
Forks44

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions