SkillAgentSearch skills...

audit

Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality

Install / Use

npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill audit

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

87/100

Category

Security

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of audit

audit scores 87/100 on our quality scale, 641st of 1,120 Security skills we index.

Its SKILL.md is 7.9 KB long, well organised into 17 sections with 4 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.

It has 560 GitHub stars, a meaningful sign that others use it.

Substance
29/30
Structure
20/20
Description
12/15
Adoption
12/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 3 days ago, so audit is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

Safety scan

No issues found

Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands.

Automated pattern scan on 2026-10-05. It catches known dangerous patterns, not every risk — read a skill before letting an agent act on it.

audit compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than audit; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
audit (this skill)by oliver-kriska875603d agoSKILL.md
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k13d agoSKILL.md
pptxby anthropics100177.9k13d agoSKILL.md
designby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k14d agoSKILL.md
ui-ux-pro-maxby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k14d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install audit?
Run npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill audit. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does audit work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is audit safe to use?
Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is audit still maintained?
The repository was last updated 3 days ago, so audit is actively maintained.

name: audit description: Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality. Use when assessing overall project health, before releases, or after refactors. effort: high argument-hint: "[--quick|--full|--focus=area|--since=commit]"

Project Health Audit

Comprehensive project-wide health assessment using 5 parallel specialist subagents.

Usage

/phx:audit              # Full audit (default)
/phx:audit --quick      # 2-3 minute pulse check
/phx:audit --focus=security   # Deep dive single area
/phx:audit --focus=performance
/phx:audit --since abc123   # Incremental audit since commit
/phx:audit --since HEAD~10  # Audit last 10 commits

When to Use

  • Quarterly health checks
  • Before major releases
  • After large refactors
  • New team member onboarding (understand codebase health)

Iron Laws

  1. Wait for ALL agents before synthesizing — Partial results create misleading health scores because cross-category correlations get missed
  2. Scope agent prompts to specific directories — Vague prompts like "analyze the codebase" produce generic findings that waste tokens and miss real issues
  3. Never compare scores across projects — Scoring methodology depends on project size and maturity; only track trends within the same project
  4. Quick mode before full mode — Run --quick first to catch compile/test failures before spending tokens on 5 parallel agents

Subagent Architecture

Spawn 5 specialists in parallel using Agent tool. Three route to plugin specialists with a declared model; the two categories without a specialist use general-purpose pinned to model: "sonnet" — unpinned, they inherit the session model (Opus by default):

| Subagent | Focus | Output File | Routes to | |----------|-------|-------------|-----------| | Architecture Reviewer | Structure quality, coupling, cohesion | arch-review.md | phoenix-patterns-analyst (sonnet) | | Performance Auditor | N+1, indexes, bottlenecks, scalability | perf-audit.md | general-purpose, model: "sonnet" (no perf specialist yet) | | Security Auditor | OWASP scan, auth patterns, secrets | security-audit.md | security-analyzer (opus) | | Test Health Auditor | Coverage, quality, flaky tests | test-audit.md | testing-reviewer (sonnet) | | Dependency Auditor | Vulnerabilities, outdated, unused | deps-audit.md | general-purpose, model: "sonnet" (hex-deps-triager is per-package only) |

Workflow

Step 1: Create Task List and Spawn All 5 Auditors (Parallel)

If TaskCreate is in your tool list, create Claude Code tasks for progress visibility (Sonnet 5+ and Opus 4.8+ omit it unless CLAUDE_CODE_ENABLE_TODO_TOOLS=1; never ToolSearch for it — skip this block):

For each auditor:
  TaskCreate({subject: "{Area} audit", activeForm: "Auditing {area}..."})
  TaskUpdate({taskId, status: "in_progress"})

Then spawn all 5 agents with Agent tool (parallel). Route to declared-model specialists where they exist, keep general-purpose only where no specialist covers the audit category:

Agent(subagent_type: "phx:phoenix-patterns-analyst", prompt: "Architecture audit: analyze module structure, context boundaries, coupling, cohesion. Write findings to .claude/audit/reports/arch-review.md", run_in_background: true)
Agent(subagent_type: "general-purpose", model: "sonnet", prompt: "Performance audit: N+1 queries, missing indexes, bottlenecks, scalability. Write findings to .claude/audit/reports/perf-audit.md", run_in_background: true)
Agent(subagent_type: "phx:security-analyzer",        prompt: "Security audit: OWASP scan, auth patterns, secret leakage. Write findings to .claude/audit/reports/security-audit.md", run_in_background: true)
Agent(subagent_type: "phx:testing-reviewer",         prompt: "Test health audit: coverage, quality, flakes. Write findings to .claude/audit/reports/test-audit.md", run_in_background: true)
Agent(subagent_type: "general-purpose", model: "sonnet", prompt: "Dependency audit: vulnerabilities, outdated, unused. Write findings to .claude/audit/reports/deps-audit.md", run_in_background: true)

Why specialist routing matters: a general-purpose subagent without model: inherits the session model — Opus on every plan since CC 2.1.280. Plugin specialists declare their own model in frontmatter, and the two general-purpose tracks pin model: "sonnet", so no audit track runs on Opus.

Agent prompts must be FOCUSED. Scope each prompt to the relevant directories and patterns. Do NOT give vague prompts like "analyze the codebase."

Output efficiency: Tell each agent: "Report ONLY issues found. Do NOT list clean checks, passing categories, or 'What's Good'. One summary line per clean area suffices."

Step 2: Collect Results

Wait for ALL auditors to complete — one completion notification per agent spawned. If you created tasks, mark each completed as it finishes. NEVER proceed while any auditor is still running.

Read reports from .claude/audit/reports/.

Rate-limit circuit breaker: if 2+ auditors return empty results or rate-limit/API errors, STOP spawning. Synthesize from the reports that exist, mark missing categories as "not audited (rate limit)", and tell the user to re-run /phx:audit after the limit resets. Never leave the user typing "continue" against dead agents.

Step 3: Compress Findings

After all 5 auditors complete, spawn context-supervisor:

Agent(subagent_type: "phx:context-supervisor", prompt: """
Compress audit findings.
Input: .claude/audit/reports/
Output: .claude/audit/summaries/
Priority: Health scores per category, critical findings
only, cross-category correlations, deduplicate findings
found by 2+ agents.
""")

Read .claude/audit/summaries/consolidated.md for synthesis.

Step 4: Calculate Health Score

Each category scores 0-100. See ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/scoring-methodology.md.

Step 5: Generate Report

Write to .claude/audit/summaries/project-health-{date}.md.

Output Format

Report includes: Executive summary with health score (A-F, numeric/100), per-category score table (Architecture, Performance, Security, Tests, Dependencies), critical issues, top recommendations, and action plan (Immediate/Short-term/Long-term).

Quick Mode (--quick)

Only run essential checks (~2-3 minutes):

Run mix compile --warnings-as-errors, then mix hex.audit && mix deps.audit, then mix xref graph --format stats, then mix test --trace 2>&1 | tail -20.

Skip: Full security scan, N+1 analysis, test quality metrics, architecture deep dive.

Focus Mode (--focus=area)

Deep dive single area with full specialist resources:

| Focus | Subagent | Extra Checks | |-------|----------|--------------| | security | security-analyzer | Full OWASP, sobelow, manual patterns | | performance | general-purpose | Profile-level analysis, query explain (no plugin specialist yet) | | architecture | phoenix-patterns-analyst | Full xref, coupling matrix, cohesion | | tests | testing-reviewer | Coverage by context, quality metrics | | deps | general-purpose | License audit, maintenance status (per-package hex-deps-triager only) |

Incremental Mode (--since <commit>)

Analyze only changes since a specific commit. Useful for pre-merge checks:

Run git diff --name-only <commit>...HEAD to identify changed files, then run targeted audits on changed files only (skips full project scan).

Combines with other flags: /phx:audit --since HEAD~5 --focus=security

Relationship to Other Commands

| Command | Scope | Frequency | |---------|-------|-----------| | /phx:review | Changed files (diff) | Every PR | | /phx:audit | Entire project | Quarterly | | /phx:boundaries | Context structure | On-demand | | /phx:verify | Compile/test pass | Anytime |

References

  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/scoring-methodology.md - How scores are calculated
  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/architecture-checks.md - Detailed architecture criteria

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars560
CategorySecurity
Updated3d ago
Forks44

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions