SkillAgentSearch skills...

business-ops

Business operations: strategy, technology, growth, competitive intelligence, support, finance, HR, legal, operations, sales, productivity, product management.

Install / Use

npx skills add notque/vexjoy-agent --skill business-ops

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

83/100

Supported Platforms

Universal

Tags

Our assessment of business-ops

business-ops scores 83/100 on our quality scale, 67th of 89 Product Management skills we index.

Its SKILL.md is 9.8 KB long, well organised into 14 sections and no code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.

It has 425 GitHub stars, a meaningful sign that others use it.

Substance
29/30
Structure
13/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
11/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated yesterday, so business-ops is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

business-ops compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than business-ops; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
business-ops (this skill)by notque834251d agoSKILL.md
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k12d agoSKILL.md
pptxby anthropics100177.9k12d agoSKILL.md
designby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k13d agoSKILL.md
ui-ux-pro-maxby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k13d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install business-ops?
Run npx skills add notque/vexjoy-agent --skill business-ops. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does business-ops work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is business-ops safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is business-ops still maintained?
The repository was last updated yesterday, so business-ops is actively maintained.

name: business-ops description: "Business operations: strategy, technology, growth, competitive intelligence, support, finance, HR, legal, operations, sales, productivity, product management." user-invocable: false allowed-tools:

  • Read
  • Write
  • Bash
  • Grep
  • Glob
  • Edit routing: triggers:
    • "business strategy"
    • "build vs buy"
    • "vendor evaluation"
    • "competitive analysis"
    • "market landscape"
    • "brand strategy"
    • "pricing strategy"
    • "hiring plan"
    • "team structure"
    • "budget allocation"
    • "revenue model"
    • "go to market"
    • "product roadmap strategy"
    • "investor pitch"
    • "partnership evaluation"
    • "operational efficiency"
    • "customer acquisition cost"
    • "unit economics"
    • "business model"
    • "market fit" not_for: "micro library choices (use decision-helper), writing content, SEO of specific posts, or tactical marketing competitive analysis (use marketing) — this is executive strategy, not campaign execution. Code security audits, vulnerability scanning, or auth-flow reviews (use security) — only financial/accounting audit and SOX compliance. Code performance review (use reviewer-code) — this covers people performance reviews and HR operations. Software task specs, requirements, or plan-lifecycle management (use planning) — this skill prioritizes and tracks work, not specs. UX design methodology, wireframes, or accessibility audits (use design) — this handles product strategy, roadmaps, user research for feature prioritization." complexity: Medium category: decision-support pairs_with:
    • content
    • data

Business Operations

Thirteen modes covering executive strategy through daily productivity. Classify the request into one mode, load its reference, follow that reference's framework.

Mode Detection

| Mode | Signal | Framework | |------|--------|-----------| | STRATEGY | Market entry, partnerships, resource allocation, "should we" | FRAME -> ANALYZE -> DECIDE | | TECHNOLOGY | Build vs buy, vendor, SaaS, tech stack | TCO analysis -> Vendor scoring -> Decision | | GROWTH | Audience, SEO, brand, community, channel | Segment -> Channel-score -> Plan | | COMPETITIVE | Competitor, market landscape, differentiation | Map landscape -> Position -> Track | | EVALUATION | Feasibility, ROI, go/no-go, effort estimate | Feasibility score -> ROI model -> Verdict | | SUPPORT | Ticket triage, response, KB article, escalation | TRIAGE/RESPOND/KB/ESCALATE/RESEARCH | | FINANCE | Journal entry, reconciliation, variance, SOX | CLASSIFY -> GATHER -> PRODUCE -> VERIFY | | HR | Recruiting, performance review, compensation, hiring | DEFINE -> PIPELINE/EVALUATE -> DOCUMENT | | LEGAL | Contract review, compliance, NDA, DSGVO, GoBD | INTAKE -> ANALYZE -> FLAG -> OUTPUT | | OPERATIONS | Runbook, process docs, risk, vendor, change mgmt | SCOPE -> AUTHOR/ASSESS -> VERIFY | | SALES | Call prep, pipeline, outreach, forecast | RESEARCH -> PREPARE/ANALYZE -> OUTPUT | | PRODUCTIVITY | Task management, daily plan, meeting, standup | CAPTURE -> DECOMPOSE -> PRIORITIZE | | PRODUCT | Feature spec, PRD, roadmap, user research, metrics | UNDERSTAND -> GATHER -> GENERATE |

If the request spans modes, pick the primary. Note the secondary.


Shared Workflow

  1. Classify the request into exactly one mode from the table.
  2. Load the mode's reference file (see Deep References). Each reference contains full framework, sub-modes, phases, and deeper reference pointers.
  3. Follow the reference's instructions. Do not improvise a framework when one exists.
  4. Every mode's top-level reference also specifies an LLM failure-modes guardrail file. Load it alongside the main reference.

Executive Modes (STRATEGY, TECHNOLOGY, GROWTH, COMPETITIVE, EVALUATION)

Load references/csuite.md for the full C-suite framework. All five modes share the same 3-phase pattern:

Phase 1: FRAME -- Convert the question into a structured decision. Name the actual decision (users present symptoms; the real decision is broader). Identify irreversibility. Set time horizon. List 2-4 options. State what makes it hard.

Phase 2: ANALYZE -- Per option: upside (best realistic + expected), downside (worst realistic + recovery + irreversible losses), requirements, opportunity cost. Separate facts from assumptions. Quantify.

Phase 3: DECIDE -- Score options via weighted criteria. Present verdict with driving factors, risk mitigations, and reversibility assessment. Load mode-specific deep references for scoring matrices.


Support Mode

Load references/customer-support.md. Five sub-modes: TRIAGE (classify ticket, assign priority P1-P4, route), RESPOND (draft calibrated reply with tone matching emotional state), KB (convert resolution into publish-ready article), ESCALATE (build structured brief with impact assessment), RESEARCH (investigate history with confidence scoring).

Key guardrail: never fabricate ticket history, resolution steps, or customer quotes.


Finance Mode

Load references/finance.md. Six sub-modes: JOURNAL ENTRY, RECONCILIATION, VARIANCE, STATEMENTS, AUDIT/SOX, CLOSE. All output is working material for qualified professionals -- not financial advice.

Key guardrails: never fabricate account codes, balances, or transaction details. Source all numbers from user-provided data. Always state GAAP/IFRS basis.


HR Mode

Load references/hr.md. Nine sub-modes: RECRUITING, PERFORMANCE, COMPENSATION, OFFER, INTERVIEW, ONBOARDING, ORG-PLANNING, PEOPLE-ANALYTICS, POLICY.

Key guardrails: source compensation data from user-provided or public databases. Focus on skills, behaviors, outcomes -- not demographics. Include legal review disclaimer on binding language. Ask for jurisdiction before compliance advice. Minimize PII retention.


Legal Mode

Load references/legal.md. Six sub-modes: CONTRACT (clause-by-clause GREEN/YELLOW/RED analysis), COMPLIANCE (regulation checklist with German compliance for DSGVO/GoBD/TDDDG), NDA (triage classification), RISK (severity x likelihood matrix), WRITING (structured legal documents), VENDOR (agreement inventory and gap analysis).

Key guardrail: analysis support only, not legal advice. All binding language needs qualified counsel review. Load references/legal/german-business-compliance.md for German-specific regulation.


Operations Mode

Load references/operations.md. Nine sub-modes: RUNBOOK, RISK, VENDOR, PROCESS, CHANGE, CAPACITY, COMPLIANCE, STATUS, OPTIMIZE.

Key patterns: RUNBOOK uses SCOPE -> AUTHOR -> VERIFY with prerequisite checklists. RISK produces severity x likelihood matrices. CHANGE follows RFC -> REVIEW -> IMPLEMENT -> VERIFY. All operations docs require rollback procedures.


Sales Mode

Load references/sales.md. Seven sub-modes: CALL-PREP, PIPELINE, OUTREACH, COMPETITIVE, FORECAST, CALL-SUMMARY, RESEARCH.

Key patterns: CALL-PREP researches prospect then builds agenda with questions. PIPELINE applies health scoring and flags stale deals. OUTREACH personalizes from research (never generic templates). FORECAST uses weighted probability with scenario analysis.


Productivity Mode

Load references/productivity.md. Six sub-modes: TASK (decompose and prioritize), PLAN (daily/weekly time blocks), MEETING (optimize or eliminate), STATUS (structured updates), REVIEW (weekly retrospective), GOAL (OKRs).

Key patterns: vertical slicing for task decomposition (shippable slices, not horizontal layers). 1/2/4-hour time buckets. Tasks over 4 hours need decomposition.


Product Mode

Load references/product-management.md. Eight sub-modes: SPEC (PRD with acceptance criteria), ROADMAP (Now/Next/Later prioritization), STAKEHOLDER (structured updates), RESEARCH (synthesis with thematic analysis), COMPETITIVE (battle cards), METRICS (funnel/cohort/retention analysis), SPRINT (backlog grooming with capacity), BRAINSTORM (Socratic exploration).


Error Handling

| Error | Response | |-------|----------| | Too many options (5+) | Eliminate obviously inferior first. Get to 2-4. | | Not enough information | Identify 2-3 critical unknowns. Recommend research sprint. | | Analysis paralysis | Reversibility test. If reversible, recommend best option with checkpoint. | | Emotional attachment | Name the pattern. Ask: stress-test, or genuinely evaluate? |


Deep References

All references contain >100 lines of domain-specific frameworks, templates, and guardrails. Load on demand per mode.

| Mode | Primary | Sub-references | |------|---------|----------------| | STRATEGY | references/csuite.md | references/strategic-frameworks.md, references/decision-matrices.md | | TECHNOLOGY | references/csuite.md | references/tco-framework.md, references/vendor-evaluation.md | | GROWTH | references/csuite.md | references/audience-segmentation.md, references/channel-evaluation.md | | COMPETITIVE | references/csuite.md | references/competitive-mapping.md, references/market-positioning.md | | EVALUATION | references/csuite.md | references/feasibility-scoring.md, references/roi-frameworks.md | | SUPPORT | references/customer-support.md | references/customer-support/*.md | | FINANCE | references/finance.md | references/finance/*.md | | HR | references/hr.md | references/hr/*.md | | LEGAL | references/legal.md | references/legal/*.md | | OPERATIONS | references/operations.md | references/operations/*.md | | SALES | references/sales.md | references/sales/*.md | | PRODUCTIVITY | references/productivity.md | references/productivity/*.md | | PRODUCT | references/product-management.md | references/product-management/*.md | | Cross-cutting | references/content-funnel.md, references/trend-analysis.md, references/risk-assessment.md, references/estimation-techniques.md, references/migration-planning.md | Shared frameworks |

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars425
CategoryProduct
Updated1d ago
Forks48

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions