SkillAgentSearch skills...

Electronic Funds Transfer: Wire Transfer

Safely monitor ransomware group Tor-hosted data leak sites (DLS) to collect and extract structured victim posting data, track group activity trends over time, and produce sector- and geography-specific ransomware risk assessments

Install / Use

npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill analyzing-ransomware-leak-site-intelligence

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

99/100

Category

Security

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of Electronic Funds Transfer: Wire Transfer

Electronic Funds Transfer: Wire Transfer scores 99/100 on our quality scale, 5th of 461 Security skills we index (top 2%).

Its SKILL.md is 14 KB long, well organised into 19 sections with 5 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.

With 33,340 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
30/30
Structure
20/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
19/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 25 days ago, so Electronic Funds Transfer: Wire Transfer is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the Apache-2.0 license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

Safety scan

No issues found

Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful.

AI review by kimi-k2.7-code on 2026-09-25. Automated pattern scan on 2026-09-25. It catches known dangerous patterns, not every risk — read a skill before letting an agent act on it.

Electronic Funds Transfer: Wire Transfer compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than Electronic Funds Transfer: Wire Transfer; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
Electronic Funds Transfer: Wire Transfer (this skill)by mukul9759933.3k25d agoSKILL.md
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k2d agoSKILL.md
pptxby anthropics100177.9k2d agoSKILL.md
designby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k3d agoSKILL.md
ui-ux-pro-maxby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k3d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install Electronic Funds Transfer: Wire Transfer?
Run npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill "Electronic Funds Transfer: Wire Transfer". The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does Electronic Funds Transfer: Wire Transfer work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is Electronic Funds Transfer: Wire Transfer safe to use?
Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful. It is Apache-2.0-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is Electronic Funds Transfer: Wire Transfer still maintained?
The repository was last updated 25 days ago, so Electronic Funds Transfer: Wire Transfer is actively maintained.

name: analyzing-ransomware-leak-site-intelligence description: Safely monitor ransomware group Tor-hosted data leak sites (DLS) to collect and extract structured victim posting data, track group activity trends over time, and produce sector- and geography-specific ransomware risk assessments. Use when performing threat intelligence gathering on active ransomware groups or building proactive defense reporting from double-extortion leak-site activity. domain: cybersecurity subdomain: threat-intelligence tags:

  • ransomware
  • leak-site
  • data-leak
  • extortion
  • threat-intelligence
  • leak-site-monitoring
  • dls
  • victim-tracking version: '1.0' author: mahipal license: Apache-2.0 nist_csf:
  • ID.RA-01
  • ID.RA-05
  • DE.CM-01
  • DE.AE-02 mitre_attack:
  • T1657
  • T1486
  • T1567.002
  • T1591 mitre_f3: version: '1.1' tactics:
    • monetization
    • reconnaissance techniques:
    • id: F1018 name: Convert to Cryptocurrency tactic: monetization source: f3
    • id: F1029 name: Gather Customer Information tactic: reconnaissance source: f3
    • id: T1593 name: Search Open Websites/Domains tactic: reconnaissance source: attack
    • id: F1025.003 name: 'Electronic Funds Transfer: Wire Transfer' tactic: monetization source: f3

Analyzing Ransomware Leak Site Intelligence

Overview

Ransomware groups operating under double-extortion models maintain data leak sites (DLS) on Tor hidden services where they post victim names, stolen data samples, and countdown timers to pressure payment. In H1 2025, 96 unique ransomware groups were active, listing approximately 535 victims per month. Monitoring these sites provides intelligence on active threat groups, targeted sectors, geographic patterns, and emerging ransomware families. This skill covers safely collecting DLS intelligence, extracting structured data, tracking group activity trends, and producing sector-specific risk assessments.

When to Use

  • When investigating security incidents that require analyzing ransomware leak site intelligence
  • When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
  • When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
  • When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.9+ with requests, beautifulsoup4, pandas, matplotlib libraries
  • Tor proxy (SOCKS5) for accessing .onion sites or commercial DLS monitoring feeds
  • Understanding of ransomware double-extortion business model
  • Familiarity with major ransomware families (Qilin, Akira, LockBit, BlackCat, Clop)
  • Access to ransomware tracking feeds (Ransomwatch, RansomLook, DarkFeed)

Key Concepts

Double Extortion Model

Modern ransomware groups encrypt victim data AND exfiltrate it before encryption. Leak sites serve as public pressure: victims are listed with a countdown timer, partial data samples, and file trees. If ransom is not paid, full data is published. Some groups have moved to triple extortion, adding DDoS threats or contacting victims' customers directly.

DLS Intelligence Value

Leak sites provide: victim identification (company name, sector, country), attack timeline (when listed, deadline, data published), data volume estimates, group capability assessment (sectors targeted, attack frequency, operational tempo), and trend analysis (new groups emerging, groups rebranding, law enforcement takedowns).

Safe Collection Practices

Never directly access DLS sites in a production environment. Use purpose-built monitoring services (Ransomwatch, DarkFeed, KELA, Flashpoint), Tor-isolated research VMs, commercial threat intelligence platforms, or community-maintained datasets. All analysis should be conducted in isolated environments with proper authorization.

Workflow

Step 1: Ingest Ransomware Leak Site Data from Public Feeds

import requests
import json
import pandas as pd
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
from collections import Counter

class RansomwareIntelCollector:
    """Collect ransomware DLS intelligence from public tracking sources."""

    RANSOMWATCH_API = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/joshhighet/ransomwatch/main/posts.json"
    RANSOMWATCH_GROUPS = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/joshhighet/ransomwatch/main/groups.json"

    def __init__(self):
        self.posts = []
        self.groups = []

    def fetch_ransomwatch_data(self):
        """Fetch ransomware victim posts from ransomwatch."""
        resp = requests.get(self.RANSOMWATCH_API, timeout=30)
        if resp.status_code == 200:
            self.posts = resp.json()
            print(f"[+] Loaded {len(self.posts)} victim posts from ransomwatch")
        else:
            print(f"[-] Failed to fetch posts: {resp.status_code}")

        resp = requests.get(self.RANSOMWATCH_GROUPS, timeout=30)
        if resp.status_code == 200:
            self.groups = resp.json()
            print(f"[+] Loaded {len(self.groups)} ransomware group profiles")

        return self.posts

    def get_recent_victims(self, days=30):
        """Get victims posted in the last N days."""
        cutoff = datetime.now() - timedelta(days=days)
        recent = []
        for post in self.posts:
            try:
                discovered = datetime.fromisoformat(
                    post.get("discovered", "").replace("Z", "+00:00")
                )
                if discovered.replace(tzinfo=None) >= cutoff:
                    recent.append(post)
            except (ValueError, TypeError):
                continue
        print(f"[+] {len(recent)} victims in last {days} days")
        return recent

    def get_group_activity(self, group_name):
        """Get all posts by a specific ransomware group."""
        group_posts = [
            p for p in self.posts
            if p.get("group_name", "").lower() == group_name.lower()
        ]
        print(f"[+] {group_name}: {len(group_posts)} total victims")
        return group_posts

collector = RansomwareIntelCollector()
collector.fetch_ransomwatch_data()
recent = collector.get_recent_victims(days=30)

Step 2: Analyze Group Activity and Trends

def analyze_group_trends(posts, top_n=15):
    """Analyze ransomware group activity trends."""
    group_counts = Counter(p.get("group_name", "unknown") for p in posts)
    monthly_activity = {}

    for post in posts:
        try:
            date = datetime.fromisoformat(
                post.get("discovered", "").replace("Z", "+00:00")
            )
            month_key = date.strftime("%Y-%m")
            group = post.get("group_name", "unknown")
            if month_key not in monthly_activity:
                monthly_activity[month_key] = Counter()
            monthly_activity[month_key][group] += 1
        except (ValueError, TypeError):
            continue

    analysis = {
        "total_posts": len(posts),
        "unique_groups": len(group_counts),
        "top_groups": group_counts.most_common(top_n),
        "monthly_totals": {
            month: sum(counts.values())
            for month, counts in sorted(monthly_activity.items())
        },
        "monthly_top_groups": {
            month: counts.most_common(5)
            for month, counts in sorted(monthly_activity.items())
        },
    }

    print(f"\n=== Ransomware Group Activity ===")
    print(f"Total victims tracked: {analysis['total_posts']}")
    print(f"Active groups: {analysis['unique_groups']}")
    print(f"\nTop {top_n} Groups:")
    for group, count in analysis["top_groups"]:
        print(f"  {group}: {count} victims")

    return analysis

trends = analyze_group_trends(collector.posts)

Step 3: Sector and Geographic Risk Assessment

def assess_sector_risk(posts, target_sector=None, target_country=None):
    """Assess ransomware risk for specific sector or geography."""
    sector_data = {}
    country_data = {}

    for post in posts:
        # Extract sector if available (not all feeds include this)
        sector = post.get("sector", post.get("industry", "unknown"))
        country = post.get("country", "unknown")

        if sector not in sector_data:
            sector_data[sector] = {"count": 0, "groups": Counter(), "recent": []}
        sector_data[sector]["count"] += 1
        sector_data[sector]["groups"][post.get("group_name", "")] += 1

        if country not in country_data:
            country_data[country] = {"count": 0, "groups": Counter()}
        country_data[country]["count"] += 1
        country_data[country]["groups"][post.get("group_name", "")] += 1

    # Sector risk scoring
    total = len(posts)
    risk_assessment = {
        "total_victims": total,
        "sectors": {},
        "countries": {},
    }

    for sector, data in sorted(sector_data.items(), key=lambda x: -x[1]["count"]):
        pct = (data["count"] / total * 100) if total > 0 else 0
        risk_assessment["sectors"][sector] = {
            "victim_count": data["count"],
            "percentage": round(pct, 1),
            "top_groups": data["groups"].most_common(5),
            "risk_level": (
                "critical" if pct > 15
                else "high" if pct > 8
                else "medium" if pct > 3
                else "low"
            ),
        }

    for country, data in sorted(country_data.items(), key=lambda x: -x[1]["count"]):
        pct = (data["count"] / total * 100) if total > 0 else 0
        risk_assessment["countries"][country] = {
            "victim_count": data["count"],
            "percentage": round(pct, 1),
            "top_groups": data["groups"].most_common(5),
        }

    return risk_assessment

risk = assess_sector_risk(collector.posts)

Step 4: Track Emerging and Rebranding Groups

def track_new_groups(posts, lookback_days=90):
    """Identify newly emerged ransomware groups."""
    group_first_seen = {}
    for post in posts:
        group = post.get("group_name", "")
        try:
            date = datetime.fromisoformat(
                post.get("discovered", "").replace("Z", "+00:00")
            )
            if group not in group_first_seen or date < group_first_seen[group]["first_seen"]:
                group_first_seen[group] = {
                    "first_seen": date,
                    "first_victim": post.get("post_title", ""),
                }
        except (ValueError, TypeError):
            continue

    cutoff = datetime.now() - timedelta(days=lookback_days)
    new_groups = {
        group: info for group, info in group_first_seen.items()
        if info["first_seen"].replace(tzinfo=None) >= cutoff
    }

    # Count total victims per new group
    for group in new_groups:
        victims = [p for p in posts if p.get("group_name") == group]
        new_groups[group]["total_victims"] = len(victims)
        new_groups[group]["avg_per_month"] = round(
            len(victims) / max(1, lookback_days / 30), 1
        )

    print(f"\n=== New Groups (last {lookback_days} days) ===")
    for group, info in sorted(new_groups.items(), key=lambda x: -x[1]["total_victims"]):
        print(f"  {group}: {info['total_victims']} victims, "
              f"first seen {info['first_seen'].strftime('%Y-%m-%d')}")

    return new_groups

new_groups = track_new_groups(collector.posts, lookback_days=90)

Step 5: Generate Intelligence Report

def generate_ransomware_intel_report(trends, risk, new_groups):
    """Generate ransomware threat intelligence report."""
    report = f"""# Ransomware Threat Intelligence Report
Generated: {datetime.now().isoformat()}

## Executive Summary
- **Total victims tracked**: {trends['total_posts']}
- **Active ransomware groups**: {trends['unique_groups']}
- **New groups (last 90 days)**: {len(new_groups)}

## Top Active Groups
| Rank | Group | Victims |
|------|-------|---------|
"""
    for i, (group, count) in enumerate(trends["top_groups"][:10], 1):
        report += f"| {i} | {group} | {count} |\n"

    rep

Truncated for display — read the full file on GitHub.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars33.3k
CategorySecurity
Updated25d ago
Forks4.0k

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions