building-soc-metrics-and-kpi-tracking
'Builds SOC performance metrics and KPI tracking dashboards measuring
Install / Use
npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill building-soc-metrics-and-kpi-trackingInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
SKILL.md
Installable skill definition
Quality Score
Category
SecuritySupported Platforms
Our assessment of building-soc-metrics-and-kpi-tracking
building-soc-metrics-and-kpi-tracking scores 95/100 on our quality scale, 150th of 544 Security skills we index (top 28%).
Its SKILL.md is 11 KB long, well organised into 14 sections with 13 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.
With 33,340 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.
Maintenance, license and trust
- The repository was last updated 25 days ago, so building-soc-metrics-and-kpi-tracking is actively maintained.
- It is released under the Apache-2.0 license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
- Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
Safety scan
No issues foundOur scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful.
AI review by kimi-k2.7-code on 2026-09-25. Automated pattern scan on 2026-09-25. It catches known dangerous patterns, not every risk — read a skill before letting an agent act on it.
building-soc-metrics-and-kpi-tracking compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than building-soc-metrics-and-kpi-tracking; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| building-soc-metrics-and-kpi-tracking (this skill)by mukul975 | 95 | 33.3k | 25d ago | SKILL.md |
| algorithmic-artby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 3d ago | SKILL.md |
| pptxby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 3d ago | SKILL.md |
| designby nextlevelbuilder | 100 | 130.2k | 4d ago | SKILL.md |
| ui-ux-pro-maxby nextlevelbuilder | 100 | 130.2k | 4d ago | SKILL.md |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install building-soc-metrics-and-kpi-tracking?
- Run
npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill building-soc-metrics-and-kpi-tracking. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does building-soc-metrics-and-kpi-tracking work with?
- It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is building-soc-metrics-and-kpi-tracking safe to use?
- Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful. It is Apache-2.0-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is building-soc-metrics-and-kpi-tracking still maintained?
- The repository was last updated 25 days ago, so building-soc-metrics-and-kpi-tracking is actively maintained.
Skill content
View source on GitHubname: building-soc-metrics-and-kpi-tracking description: 'Builds SOC performance metrics and KPI tracking dashboards measuring Mean Time to Detect (MTTD), Mean Time to Respond (MTTR), alert quality ratios, analyst productivity, and detection coverage using SIEM data. Use when SOC leadership needs operational visibility, continuous improvement tracking, or executive-level reporting on security operations effectiveness.
' domain: cybersecurity subdomain: soc-operations tags:
- soc
- metrics
- kpi
- mttd
- mttr
- dashboard
- reporting
- continuous-improvement version: '1.0' author: mahipal license: Apache-2.0 nist_ai_rmf:
- MEASURE-2.7
- MAP-5.1
- MANAGE-2.4 atlas_techniques:
- AML.T0070
- AML.T0066
- AML.T0082 nist_csf:
- DE.CM-01
- DE.AE-02
- RS.MA-01
- DE.AE-06 mitre_attack:
- T1078
- T1071
Building SOC Metrics and KPI Tracking
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- SOC leadership needs data-driven visibility into operational performance
- Continuous improvement programs require baseline measurements and trend tracking
- Executive reporting demands quantified security posture and ROI metrics
- Staffing decisions need objective workload and capacity data
- Compliance audits require documented SOC performance evidence
Do not use metrics as punitive measures against analysts — metrics should drive process improvement, not individual performance management.
Prerequisites
- SIEM with 90+ days of incident and alert disposition data
- Incident ticketing system (ServiceNow, Jira) with timestamp data for incident lifecycle
- Analyst shift schedules and staffing data
- ATT&CK Navigator for detection coverage tracking
- Dashboard platform (Splunk, Grafana, or Power BI)
Workflow
Step 1: Define Core SOC Metrics Framework
Establish the key metrics aligned to NIST CSF functions:
| Metric | Definition | Target | NIST CSF | |--------|-----------|--------|----------| | MTTD | Time from threat occurrence to SOC detection | <15 min | Detect | | MTTA | Time from alert to analyst acknowledgment | <5 min | Respond | | MTTI | Time from acknowledgment to investigation start | <10 min | Respond | | MTTC | Time from investigation to containment | <1 hour | Respond | | MTTR | Time from detection to full resolution | <4 hours | Recover | | FP Rate | Percentage of false positive alerts | <30% | Detect | | TP Rate | Percentage of true positive alerts | >40% | Detect | | Coverage | ATT&CK techniques with active detection | >60% | Detect | | Dwell Time | Attacker time in network before detection | <24 hours | Detect | | Escalation Rate | % of Tier 1 alerts escalated to Tier 2/3 | 15-25% | Respond |
Step 2: Implement MTTD/MTTR Measurement
Mean Time to Detect (MTTD):
index=notable earliest=-30d status_label="Resolved*"
| eval mttd_seconds = _time - orig_time
| where mttd_seconds > 0 AND mttd_seconds < 86400 --- Exclude data quality issues
| stats avg(mttd_seconds) AS avg_mttd,
median(mttd_seconds) AS med_mttd,
perc90(mttd_seconds) AS p90_mttd,
perc95(mttd_seconds) AS p95_mttd
by urgency
| eval avg_mttd_min = round(avg_mttd / 60, 1)
| eval med_mttd_min = round(med_mttd / 60, 1)
| eval p90_mttd_min = round(p90_mttd / 60, 1)
| table urgency, avg_mttd_min, med_mttd_min, p90_mttd_min
Mean Time to Respond (MTTR):
index=notable earliest=-30d status_label="Resolved*"
| eval mttr_seconds = status_end - _time
| where mttr_seconds > 0 AND mttr_seconds < 604800 --- <7 days
| stats avg(mttr_seconds) AS avg_mttr,
median(mttr_seconds) AS med_mttr,
perc90(mttr_seconds) AS p90_mttr
by urgency
| eval avg_mttr_hours = round(avg_mttr / 3600, 1)
| eval med_mttr_hours = round(med_mttr / 3600, 1)
| eval p90_mttr_hours = round(p90_mttr / 3600, 1)
| table urgency, avg_mttr_hours, med_mttr_hours, p90_mttr_hours
MTTD/MTTR Trend Over Time:
index=notable earliest=-90d status_label="Resolved*"
| eval mttd_min = (_time - orig_time) / 60
| eval mttr_hours = (status_end - _time) / 3600
| bin _time span=1w
| stats avg(mttd_min) AS avg_mttd_min, avg(mttr_hours) AS avg_mttr_hours,
count AS incidents by _time
| table _time, incidents, avg_mttd_min, avg_mttr_hours
Step 3: Measure Alert Quality and Analyst Productivity
Alert Disposition Analysis:
index=notable earliest=-30d
| stats count AS total,
sum(eval(if(status_label="Resolved - True Positive", 1, 0))) AS tp,
sum(eval(if(status_label="Resolved - False Positive", 1, 0))) AS fp,
sum(eval(if(status_label="Resolved - Benign", 1, 0))) AS benign,
sum(eval(if(status_label="New" OR status_label="In Progress", 1, 0))) AS pending
| eval tp_rate = round(tp / total * 100, 1)
| eval fp_rate = round(fp / total * 100, 1)
| eval signal_noise = round(tp / (fp + 0.01), 2)
| table total, tp, fp, benign, pending, tp_rate, fp_rate, signal_noise
Analyst Productivity Metrics:
index=notable earliest=-30d status_label="Resolved*"
| stats count AS alerts_resolved,
avg(eval((status_end - status_transition_time) / 60)) AS avg_triage_min,
dc(rule_name) AS unique_rule_types
by owner
| eval alerts_per_day = round(alerts_resolved / 30, 1)
| sort - alerts_resolved
| table owner, alerts_resolved, alerts_per_day, avg_triage_min, unique_rule_types
Shift-Based Workload Distribution:
index=notable earliest=-30d
| eval hour = strftime(_time, "%H")
| eval shift = case(
hour >= 6 AND hour < 14, "Day (06-14)",
hour >= 14 AND hour < 22, "Swing (14-22)",
1=1, "Night (22-06)"
)
| stats count AS alerts, dc(owner) AS analysts by shift
| eval alerts_per_analyst = round(alerts / analysts / 30, 1)
| table shift, alerts, analysts, alerts_per_analyst
Step 4: Track Detection Coverage
ATT&CK Coverage Score:
| inputlookup detection_rules_attack_mapping.csv
| stats dc(technique_id) AS covered_techniques by tactic
| join tactic type=left [
| inputlookup attack_techniques_total.csv
| stats dc(technique_id) AS total_techniques by tactic
]
| eval coverage_pct = round(covered_techniques / total_techniques * 100, 1)
| sort tactic
| table tactic, covered_techniques, total_techniques, coverage_pct
Data Source Coverage:
| inputlookup expected_data_sources.csv
| join data_source type=left [
| tstats count where index=* by sourcetype
| rename sourcetype AS data_source
| eval status = "Active"
]
| eval source_status = if(isnotnull(status), "Collecting", "MISSING")
| stats count by source_status
| table source_status, count
Step 5: Build Executive Reporting Dashboard
Monthly SOC Executive Summary:
--- Incident summary by category
index=notable earliest=-30d status_label="Resolved*"
| stats count by urgency
| eval order = case(urgency="critical", 1, urgency="high", 2, urgency="medium", 3,
urgency="low", 4, urgency="informational", 5)
| sort order
--- Month-over-month comparison
index=notable earliest=-60d
| eval period = if(_time > relative_time(now(), "-30d"), "This Month", "Last Month")
| stats count by period, urgency
| chart sum(count) AS incidents by urgency, period
--- Top 5 incident categories
index=notable earliest=-30d status_label="Resolved - True Positive"
| top rule_name limit=5
| table rule_name, count, percent
Security Posture Scorecard:
| makeresults
| eval metrics = mvappend(
"MTTD: 8.3 min (Target: <15 min) | STATUS: GREEN",
"MTTR: 3.2 hours (Target: <4 hours) | STATUS: GREEN",
"FP Rate: 27% (Target: <30%) | STATUS: GREEN",
"Detection Coverage: 64% (Target: >60%) | STATUS: GREEN",
"Analyst Utilization: 78% (Target: 60-80%) | STATUS: GREEN",
"Incident Backlog: 12 (Target: <20) | STATUS: GREEN"
)
| mvexpand metrics
| table metrics
Step 6: Implement Continuous Improvement Tracking
Track improvement initiatives and their impact:
--- Improvement initiative tracking
| inputlookup soc_improvement_initiatives.csv
| eval status_color = case(
status="Completed", "green",
status="In Progress", "yellow",
status="Planned", "gray"
)
| table initiative, start_date, target_date, status, metric_impact, baseline, current
Example initiatives:
initiative,start_date,target_date,status,metric_impact,baseline,current
Risk-Based Alerting,2024-01-15,2024-03-15,Completed,Alert Volume,-84%,287/day
Sigma Rule Library,2024-02-01,2024-04-01,In Progress,ATT&CK Coverage,61%,64%
SOAR Phishing Playbook,2024-02-15,2024-03-30,In Progress,Phishing MTTR,45min,18min
Analyst Training Program,2024-01-01,2024-06-30,In Progress,TP Rate,31%,41%
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition | |------|-----------| | MTTD | Mean Time to Detect — average time from threat occurrence to SOC alert generation | | MTTR | Mean Time to Respond — average time from detection to incident resolution | | MTTA | Mean Time to Acknowledge — average time from alert generation to analyst assignment | | Signal-to-Noise Ratio | Ratio of true positive alerts to total alerts — higher is better | | Dwell Time | Duration an attacker remains undetected in the environment — key indicator of detection effectiveness | | Analyst Utilization | Percentage of analyst time spent on productive investigation vs. overhead tasks |
Tools & Systems
- Splunk Dashboard Studio: Advanced visualization framework for building interactive SOC metric dashboards
- Grafana: Open-source analytics and visualization platform supporting multiple data sources
- Power BI: Microsoft business intelligence tool for executive-level reporting and trend analysis
- ATT&CK Navigator: MITRE tool for visualizing detection coverage as layered heatmaps
- ServiceNow Performance Analytics: ITSM analytics module for tracking incident lifecycle metrics
Common Scenarios
- Quarterly Business Review: Present MTTD/MTTR trends, detection coverage growth, and alert quality improvements
- Staffing Justification: Use workload metrics to justify additional analyst headcount or shift adjustments
- Tool ROI Assessment: Compare alert quality and response times before and after new tool deployment
- Compliance Evidence: Provide documented SOC performance metrics for ISO 27001 or SOC 2 audits
- Vendor Comparison: Benchmark SOC metrics against industry peers using surveys (SANS, Ponemon)
Output Format
SOC PERFORMANCE REPORT — March 2024
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
KEY METRICS:
Metric Current Target Trend Status
MTTD 8.3 min <15 min -12% GREEN
MTTR 3.2 hrs <4 hrs -18% GREEN
FP Rate 27% <30% -5% GREEN
TP Rate 41% >40% +3% GREEN
ATT&CK Coverage 64% >60% +3% GREEN
Alerts/Analyst/Day 24 <50 -84% GREEN
INCIDENT SUMMARY:
Total Incidents: 147 (Critical: 3, High: 23, Medium: 78, Low: 43)
Avg Resolution: 3.2 hours (Critical: 1.8h, High: 2.9h, Medium: 4.1h)
SLA Compliance: 94% (Target: >90%)
IMPROVEMENT HIGHLIGHTS:
[1] RBA deployment reduced daily alerts from 1,847 to 287 (-84%)
[2] New Sigma rules added 12 ATT&CK techniques to coverage
[3] SOAR phishing playbook reduced phishing MTTR by 60%
AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT:
[1] Lateral movement detection coverage at 58% (below 60% target)
[2] Night shift MTTD 23% slower than day shift
[3] 4 critical vulnerability scan tickets overdue on SLA
Related Skills
algorithmic-art
177.9kCreating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems.
pptx
177.9kUse this skill any time a .pptx or .potx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx or .potx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an em…
design
130.2kComprehensive design skill: brand identity, design tokens, UI styling, logo generation (55 styles, Gemini, Atlas Cloud, or MuAPI AI), corporate identity program (50 deliverables, CIP mockups), HTML presentations (Chart.js), banner design (22 styles, social/ads/web/print), icon design (15 styles, SVG…
ui-ux-pro-max
130.2kUI/UX design intelligence for web, mobile, and desktop. This skill should be used when designing, building, reviewing, or fixing interfaces, including pages, components, design systems, accessibility, interaction, responsive layout, typography, color, charts, and stack-specific UI implementation.
Languages
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
