SkillAgentSearch skills...

analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery

Analyze the NTFS Master File Table ($MFT) with MFTECmd, analyzeMFT,

Install / Use

npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

95/100

Category

Security

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery

analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery scores 95/100 on our quality scale, 126th of 544 Security skills we index (top 24%).

Its SKILL.md is 10 KB long, well organised into 39 sections with 7 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.

With 33,340 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
29/30
Structure
20/20
Description
12/15
Adoption
19/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 25 days ago, so analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the Apache-2.0 license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

Safety scan

No issues found

Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful.

AI review by kimi-k2.7-code on 2026-09-25. Automated pattern scan on 2026-09-25. It catches known dangerous patterns, not every risk — read a skill before letting an agent act on it.

analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery (this skill)by mukul9759533.3k25d agoSKILL.md
Agent-Reachby Panniantong10085.4k10d agoCLAUDE.md
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k3d agoSKILL.md
pptxby anthropics100177.9k3d agoSKILL.md
designby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k4d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery?
Run npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery safe to use?
Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful. It is Apache-2.0-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery still maintained?
The repository was last updated 25 days ago, so analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery is actively maintained.

name: analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery description: Analyze the NTFS Master File Table ($MFT) with MFTECmd, analyzeMFT, and X-Ways Forensics to recover metadata and content of deleted files by examining MFT record entries, $LogFile, $UsnJrnl, and MFT slack space. Use when recovering evidence of deleted files, reconstructing NTFS file-system timelines, or detecting anti-forensic timestomping during a Windows forensic examination. domain: cybersecurity subdomain: digital-forensics tags:

  • mft
  • ntfs
  • deleted-files
  • file-recovery
  • mftecmd
  • usn-journal
  • logfile
  • mft-slack-space
  • file-system-forensics
  • dfir version: '1.0' author: mahipal license: Apache-2.0 nist_csf:
  • RS.AN-03
  • DE.AE-02
  • RS.MA-01 mitre_attack:
  • T1070.004
  • T1070.006
  • T1005

Analyzing MFT for Deleted File Recovery

Overview

The NTFS Master File Table ($MFT) is the central metadata repository for every file and directory on an NTFS volume. Each file is represented by at least one 1024-byte MFT record containing attributes such as $STANDARD_INFORMATION (timestamps, permissions), $FILE_NAME (name, parent directory, timestamps), and $DATA (file content or cluster run pointers). When a file is deleted, its MFT record is marked as inactive (InUse flag cleared) but the metadata remains until the entry is reallocated by a new file. This persistence makes MFT analysis a primary technique for recovering deleted file evidence, reconstructing file system timelines, and detecting anti-forensic activity such as timestomping.

When to Use

  • When investigating security incidents that require analyzing mft for deleted file recovery
  • When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
  • When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
  • When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques

Prerequisites

  • Forensic disk image (E01, raw/dd, VMDK, or VHDX format)
  • MFTECmd (Eric Zimmerman) or analyzeMFT (Python-based)
  • FTK Imager, Arsenal Image Mounter, or similar for image mounting
  • Timeline Explorer or Excel for CSV analysis
  • Python 3.8+ for custom analysis scripts
  • Understanding of NTFS file system internals

MFT Structure and Record Layout

MFT Record Header

Each MFT record begins with the signature "FILE" (0x46494C45) and contains:

| Offset | Size | Field | |--------|------|-------| | 0x00 | 4 bytes | Signature ("FILE") | | 0x04 | 2 bytes | Offset to update sequence | | 0x06 | 2 bytes | Size of update sequence | | 0x08 | 8 bytes | $LogFile sequence number | | 0x10 | 2 bytes | Sequence number | | 0x12 | 2 bytes | Hard link count | | 0x14 | 2 bytes | Offset to first attribute | | 0x16 | 2 bytes | Flags (0x01 = InUse, 0x02 = Directory) | | 0x18 | 4 bytes | Used size of MFT record | | 0x1C | 4 bytes | Allocated size of MFT record | | 0x20 | 8 bytes | Base file record reference | | 0x28 | 2 bytes | Next attribute ID |

Key MFT Attributes

| Type ID | Name | Description | |---------|------|-------------| | 0x10 | $STANDARD_INFORMATION | Timestamps, flags, owner ID, security ID | | 0x30 | $FILE_NAME | Filename, parent MFT reference, timestamps | | 0x40 | $OBJECT_ID | Unique GUID for the file | | 0x50 | $SECURITY_DESCRIPTOR | ACL permissions | | 0x60 | $VOLUME_NAME | Volume label (volume metadata files only) | | 0x80 | $DATA | File content (resident if <700 bytes) or cluster run list | | 0x90 | $INDEX_ROOT | B-tree index root for directories | | 0xA0 | $INDEX_ALLOCATION | B-tree index entries for large directories | | 0xB0 | $BITMAP | Allocation bitmap for index or MFT |

Deleted File Recovery Techniques

Technique 1: MFT Record Analysis with MFTECmd

# Extract $MFT from forensic image using KAPE or FTK Imager
# Parse the $MFT with MFTECmd
MFTECmd.exe -f "C:\Evidence\$MFT" --csv C:\Output --csvf mft_full.csv

# Filter for deleted files (InUse = FALSE) in Timeline Explorer
# Look for entries where InUse column is False

Identifying Deleted Files in CSV Output:

  • InUse = False indicates a deleted or reallocated record
  • ParentPath shows original file location before deletion
  • FileSize shows the original size (may still be recoverable)
  • Timestamps in $STANDARD_INFORMATION and $FILE_NAME attributes persist

Technique 2: USN Journal ($UsnJrnl:$J) Analysis

The USN Journal records all changes to files on an NTFS volume, including creation, deletion, rename, and data modification events.

# Parse USN Journal with MFTECmd
MFTECmd.exe -f "C:\Evidence\$J" --csv C:\Output --csvf usn_journal.csv

# Key USN reason codes for deletion evidence:
# USN_REASON_FILE_DELETE     = 0x00000200
# USN_REASON_CLOSE           = 0x80000000
# USN_REASON_RENAME_OLD_NAME = 0x00001000
# USN_REASON_RENAME_NEW_NAME = 0x00002000

Technique 3: $LogFile Transaction Analysis

The $LogFile stores NTFS transaction records that can reveal file operations even after the USN Journal has been cycled.

# Parse $LogFile with LogFileParser
LogFileParser.exe -l "C:\Evidence\$LogFile" -o C:\Output

# Look for REDO and UNDO operations indicating file deletion:
# - DeallocateFileRecordSegment
# - DeleteAttribute
# - UpdateResidentValue (clearing InUse flag)

Technique 4: MFT Slack Space Analysis

MFT slack space exists between the end of the used portion of an MFT record and the end of the allocated 1024 bytes. This area may contain remnants of previous file records.

import struct

def parse_mft_slack(mft_path: str, output_path: str):
    """Extract and analyze MFT slack space for deleted file remnants."""
    with open(mft_path, "rb") as f:
        record_size = 1024
        record_num = 0
        slack_findings = []

        while True:
            record = f.read(record_size)
            if len(record) < record_size:
                break

            # Verify FILE signature
            if record[:4] != b"FILE":
                record_num += 1
                continue

            # Get used size from offset 0x18
            used_size = struct.unpack("<I", record[0x18:0x1C])[0]

            if used_size < record_size:
                slack = record[used_size:]
                # Check if slack contains readable strings or attribute headers
                if any(c > 0x20 and c < 0x7F for c in slack[:50]):
                    slack_findings.append({
                        "record": record_num,
                        "used_size": used_size,
                        "slack_size": record_size - used_size,
                        "slack_preview": slack[:100].hex()
                    })

            record_num += 1

    return slack_findings

Correlation with Supporting Artifacts

Cross-Reference MFT with $Recycle.Bin

# Parse Recycle Bin with RBCmd
RBCmd.exe -d "C:\Evidence\$Recycle.Bin" --csv C:\Output --csvf recycle_bin.csv

# Correlate: $I files contain original path and deletion timestamp
# Match MFT entry numbers from $R files back to original MFT records

Cross-Reference MFT with Volume Shadow Copies

# List volume shadow copies
vssadmin list shadows

# Mount shadow copies and extract $MFT from each
# Compare MFT records across shadow copies to track file changes over time

Forensic Value

  • Deleted file metadata recovery: Original filename, path, size, and timestamps
  • Timeline reconstruction: File creation, modification, access, and deletion events
  • Timestomping detection: Comparing $SI vs $FN timestamps
  • Data carving guidance: MFT cluster runs point to file content on disk
  • Anti-forensic detection: Identifying wiped or manipulated MFT records

References

  • NTFS MFT Advanced Forensic Analysis: https://www.deaddisk.com/posts/ntfs-mft-advanced-forensic-analysis-guide/
  • MFT Slack Space Forensic Value: https://www.sygnia.co/blog/the-forensic-value-of-mft-slack-space/
  • MFTECmd Documentation: https://ericzimmerman.github.io/
  • SANS FOR500: Windows Forensic Analysis

Example Output

$ MFTECmd.exe -f "C:\Evidence\$MFT" --csv /analysis/mft_output

MFTECmd v1.2.2 - MFT Parser
==============================
Input: C:\Evidence\$MFT (Size: 384 MB)
Total MFT Entries: 395,264

Parsing MFT entries... Done (12.4 seconds)

--- Deleted File Recovery Summary ---
Total Entries:          395,264
Active Files:           245,832
Deleted Files:          149,432
  Recoverable:          87,234 (resident data or clusters not reallocated)
  Partially Recoverable: 31,456 (some clusters overwritten)
  Unrecoverable:        30,742 (all clusters reallocated)

--- Recently Deleted Files (Incident Window: 2024-01-15 to 2024-01-18) ---
MFT Entry | Filename                          | Path                               | Size      | Deleted (UTC)         | Recoverable
----------|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------|-----------------------|------------
148923    | exfil_tool.exe                    | C:\ProgramData\Updates\            | 1,258,496 | 2024-01-17 02:45:12   | YES
148924    | exfil_tool.log                    | C:\ProgramData\Updates\            | 45,312    | 2024-01-17 02:45:14   | YES
149001    | passwords.txt                     | C:\Users\jsmith\Desktop\           | 2,048     | 2024-01-17 02:50:33   | YES
149150    | scan_results.csv                  | C:\Users\jsmith\AppData\Local\Temp | 892,416   | 2024-01-17 03:00:01   | PARTIAL
149200    | mimikatz.exe                      | C:\Windows\Temp\                   | 1,250,816 | 2024-01-18 01:15:22   | YES
149201    | sekurlsa.log                      | C:\Windows\Temp\                   | 32,768    | 2024-01-18 01:15:25   | YES
149302    | .bash_history                     | C:\Users\jsmith\                   | 4,096     | 2024-01-18 03:00:00   | NO
149400    | ClearEventLogs.ps1                | C:\Windows\Temp\                   | 1,536     | 2024-01-18 03:01:12   | YES

--- $STANDARD_INFORMATION vs $FILE_NAME Timestamp Analysis (Timestomping Detection) ---
MFT Entry | Filename            | $SI Created          | $FN Created          | Delta     | Verdict
----------|---------------------|----------------------|----------------------|-----------|----------
148923    | exfil_tool.exe      | 2023-06-15 10:00:00  | 2024-01-15 14:34:02  | -214 days | TIMESTOMPED
149200    | mimikatz.exe        | 2022-01-01 00:00:00  | 2024-01-16 02:30:15  | -745 days | TIMESTOMPED

Recovered files exported to: /analysis/mft_output/recovered/
Full CSV report: /analysis/mft_output/mft_analysis.csv (395,264 rows)
Timeline CSV: /analysis/mft_output/mft_timeline.csv

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars33.3k
CategorySecurity
Updated25d ago
Forks4.0k

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions