analyzing-docker-container-forensics
Investigate compromised Docker containers by analyzing images, layers,
Install / Use
npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill analyzing-docker-container-forensicsInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
SKILL.md
Installable skill definition
Quality Score
Category
SecuritySupported Platforms
Our assessment of analyzing-docker-container-forensics
analyzing-docker-container-forensics scores 96/100 on our quality scale, 87th of 544 Security skills we index (top 16%).
Its SKILL.md is 13 KB long, well organised into 57 sections with 6 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.
With 33,340 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.
Maintenance, license and trust
- The repository was last updated 25 days ago, so analyzing-docker-container-forensics is actively maintained.
- It is released under the Apache-2.0 license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
- Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
Safety scan
No issues foundOur scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful.
AI review by kimi-k2.7-code on 2026-09-25. Automated pattern scan on 2026-09-25. It catches known dangerous patterns, not every risk — read a skill before letting an agent act on it.
analyzing-docker-container-forensics compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than analyzing-docker-container-forensics; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| analyzing-docker-container-forensics (this skill)by mukul975 | 96 | 33.3k | 25d ago | SKILL.md |
| Agent-Reachby Panniantong | 100 | 85.4k | 10d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| LocalAIby mudler | 100 | 49.3k | today | MCP Server |
| algorithmic-artby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 3d ago | SKILL.md |
| pptxby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 3d ago | SKILL.md |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install analyzing-docker-container-forensics?
- Run
npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill analyzing-docker-container-forensics. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does analyzing-docker-container-forensics work with?
- It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is analyzing-docker-container-forensics safe to use?
- Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful. It is Apache-2.0-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is analyzing-docker-container-forensics still maintained?
- The repository was last updated 25 days ago, so analyzing-docker-container-forensics is actively maintained.
Skill content
View source on GitHubname: analyzing-docker-container-forensics description: Investigate compromised Docker containers by analyzing images, layers, volumes, logs, and runtime artifacts to identify malicious activity and evidence. domain: cybersecurity subdomain: digital-forensics tags:
- forensics
- docker
- container-forensics
- container-security
- image-analysis
- runtime-investigation version: '1.0' author: mahipal license: Apache-2.0 nist_csf:
- RS.AN-03
- DE.AE-02
- RS.MA-01 mitre_attack:
- T1610
- T1611
- T1613
- T1612
Analyzing Docker Container Forensics
When to Use
- When investigating a compromised Docker container or container host
- For analyzing malicious Docker images pulled from registries
- During incident response involving containerized application breaches
- When examining container escape attempts or privilege escalation
- For auditing container configurations and identifying misconfigurations
Prerequisites
- Docker CLI access on the forensic workstation
- Access to the Docker host file system (forensic image or live)
- Understanding of Docker layered file system (overlay2, aufs)
- dive, docker-explorer, or container-diff for image analysis
- Knowledge of Docker daemon configuration and socket security
- Trivy or Grype for vulnerability scanning of container images
Workflow
Step 1: Preserve Container State and Evidence
# List all containers (including stopped)
docker ps -a --no-trunc > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_list.txt
# Inspect the compromised container
CONTAINER_ID="abc123def456"
docker inspect $CONTAINER_ID > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_inspect.json
# Export container filesystem as tarball (preserves current state)
docker export $CONTAINER_ID > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_export.tar
# Create an image from the container's current state
docker commit $CONTAINER_ID forensic-evidence:case-2024-001
docker save forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_image.tar
# Capture container logs
docker logs $CONTAINER_ID --timestamps > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_logs.txt 2>&1
# Capture running processes (if container is still running)
docker top $CONTAINER_ID > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_processes.txt
# Capture network connections
docker exec $CONTAINER_ID netstat -tlnp 2>/dev/null > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_network.txt
# Copy specific files from the container
docker cp $CONTAINER_ID:/var/log/ /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_var_log/
docker cp $CONTAINER_ID:/tmp/ /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_tmp/
docker cp $CONTAINER_ID:/etc/passwd /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_passwd
# Hash all exported evidence
sha256sum /cases/case-2024-001/docker/*.tar > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/evidence_hashes.txt
Step 2: Analyze Container Image Layers
# Install dive for image layer analysis
wget https://github.com/wagoodman/dive/releases/latest/download/dive_linux_amd64.deb
sudo dpkg -i dive_linux_amd64.deb
# Analyze image layers interactively
dive forensic-evidence:case-2024-001
# Non-interactive layer analysis
dive forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 --ci --json /cases/case-2024-001/docker/dive_analysis.json
# Extract and examine individual layers
mkdir -p /cases/case-2024-001/docker/layers/
tar -xf /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_image.tar -C /cases/case-2024-001/docker/layers/
# List the image manifest and layer order
cat /cases/case-2024-001/docker/layers/manifest.json | python3 -m json.tool
# Examine each layer for changes
for layer in /cases/case-2024-001/docker/layers/*/layer.tar; do
echo "=== Layer: $(dirname $layer | xargs basename) ==="
tar -tf "$layer" | head -20
echo "..."
done
# Use container-diff to compare with original base image
# Install container-diff
curl -LO https://storage.googleapis.com/container-diff/latest/container-diff-linux-amd64
chmod +x container-diff-linux-amd64
# Compare committed image with original
./container-diff-linux-amd64 diff daemon://nginx:latest daemon://forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 \
--type=file --type=apt --type=history --json \
> /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_diff.json
Step 3: Examine Docker Host Artifacts
# Docker data directory (default: /var/lib/docker/)
DOCKER_ROOT="/mnt/evidence/var/lib/docker"
# Examine overlay2 filesystem layers
ls -la $DOCKER_ROOT/overlay2/
# Find the container's merged filesystem
CONTAINER_HASH=$(docker inspect $CONTAINER_ID --format '{{.GraphDriver.Data.MergedDir}}' 2>/dev/null)
# Or manually from forensic image:
# Look in /var/lib/docker/containers/<container_id>/config.v2.json
# Analyze container configuration files
cat $DOCKER_ROOT/containers/$CONTAINER_ID/config.v2.json | python3 -m json.tool \
> /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_config.json
# Check Docker daemon configuration
cat /mnt/evidence/etc/docker/daemon.json 2>/dev/null > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/daemon_config.json
# Examine Docker events log
cat $DOCKER_ROOT/containers/$CONTAINER_ID/*.log > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_json_logs.txt
# Check for volume mounts (potential host filesystem access)
python3 << 'PYEOF'
import json
with open('/cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_inspect.json') as f:
data = json.load(f)
inspect = data[0] if isinstance(data, list) else data
print("=== CONTAINER SECURITY ANALYSIS ===\n")
# Check mounts
print("Volume Mounts:")
for mount in inspect.get('Mounts', []):
rw = "READ-WRITE" if mount.get('RW') else "READ-ONLY"
print(f" {mount.get('Source', 'N/A')} -> {mount.get('Destination', 'N/A')} ({rw})")
if mount.get('Source') in ('/', '/etc', '/var', '/root') and mount.get('RW'):
print(f" WARNING: Sensitive host path mounted read-write!")
# Check privileged mode
host_config = inspect.get('HostConfig', {})
if host_config.get('Privileged'):
print("\nWARNING: Container was running in PRIVILEGED mode!")
# Check capabilities
cap_add = host_config.get('CapAdd', [])
if cap_add:
print(f"\nAdded Capabilities: {cap_add}")
dangerous_caps = ['SYS_ADMIN', 'SYS_PTRACE', 'NET_ADMIN', 'SYS_MODULE']
for cap in cap_add:
if cap in dangerous_caps:
print(f" WARNING: Dangerous capability: {cap}")
# Check PID namespace
if host_config.get('PidMode') == 'host':
print("\nWARNING: Container shares host PID namespace!")
# Check network mode
if host_config.get('NetworkMode') == 'host':
print("\nWARNING: Container shares host network namespace!")
# Check user
user = inspect.get('Config', {}).get('User', 'root (default)')
print(f"\nRunning as user: {user}")
# Check environment variables for secrets
env_vars = inspect.get('Config', {}).get('Env', [])
print(f"\nEnvironment Variables: {len(env_vars)}")
for env in env_vars:
key = env.split('=')[0]
if any(s in key.upper() for s in ['PASSWORD', 'SECRET', 'KEY', 'TOKEN', 'CREDENTIAL']):
print(f" SENSITIVE: {key}=***REDACTED***")
PYEOF
Step 4: Analyze Container File System Changes
# Compare container filesystem to original image
docker diff $CONTAINER_ID > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/filesystem_changes.txt
# A = Added, C = Changed, D = Deleted
# Analyze changes
python3 << 'PYEOF'
added = []
changed = []
deleted = []
with open('/cases/case-2024-001/docker/filesystem_changes.txt') as f:
for line in f:
line = line.strip()
if line.startswith('A '):
added.append(line[2:])
elif line.startswith('C '):
changed.append(line[2:])
elif line.startswith('D '):
deleted.append(line[2:])
print(f"Files Added: {len(added)}")
print(f"Files Changed: {len(changed)}")
print(f"Files Deleted: {len(deleted)}")
# Flag suspicious additions
suspicious = [f for f in added if any(s in f for s in
['/tmp/', '/dev/shm/', '/root/', '.sh', '.py', '.elf', 'reverse', 'shell', 'backdoor'])]
if suspicious:
print(f"\nSuspicious Added Files:")
for f in suspicious:
print(f" {f}")
# Flag suspicious changes
sus_changed = [f for f in changed if any(s in f for s in
['/etc/passwd', '/etc/shadow', '/etc/crontab', '/etc/ssh', '.bashrc'])]
if sus_changed:
print(f"\nSuspicious Changed Files:")
for f in sus_changed:
print(f" {f}")
PYEOF
# Extract and examine the container export
mkdir -p /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/
tar -xf /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_export.tar -C /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/
# Scan for webshells and malicious files
find /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/tmp/ -type f -exec file {} \;
find /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/ -name "*.php" -newer /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/etc/hostname
Step 5: Scan for Vulnerabilities and Generate Report
# Scan the image for known vulnerabilities
trivy image forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 \
--format json \
--output /cases/case-2024-001/docker/vulnerability_scan.json
# Scan the exported filesystem
trivy fs /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/ \
--format table \
--output /cases/case-2024-001/docker/fs_vulnerabilities.txt
# Check for secrets in the image
trivy image forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 \
--scanners secret \
--format json \
--output /cases/case-2024-001/docker/secrets_scan.json
Key Concepts
| Concept | Description | |---------|-------------| | Image layers | Read-only filesystem layers stacked to form the container image | | overlay2 | Default Docker storage driver using union filesystem for layers | | Container diff | Comparison of runtime filesystem changes against the original image | | Privileged mode | Container with full host capabilities (bypasses most isolation) | | Docker socket | Unix socket (/var/run/docker.sock) controlling the Docker daemon | | Container escape | Technique for breaking out of container isolation to the host | | Volume mounts | Host filesystem paths made accessible inside the container | | Image history | Record of Dockerfile instructions used to build each layer |
Tools & Systems
| Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | docker inspect | Detailed container configuration and state information | | docker diff | Show filesystem changes made in a running/stopped container | | dive | Interactive Docker image layer analysis tool | | container-diff | Google tool for comparing container image contents | | Trivy | Vulnerability scanner for container images and filesystems | | docker-explorer | Forensic tool for offline Docker artifact analysis | | Sysdig | Container runtime security monitoring and forensics | | Falco | Runtime threat detection for containers and Kubernetes |
Common Scenarios
Scenario 1: Web Application Container Compromise Export the container filesystem, identify webshells in web root, analyze access logs for exploitation attempts, check for added files and modified configurations, examine network connections for C2 communication, review container capabilities for escalation paths.
Scenario 2: Supply Chain Attack via Malicious Image Analyze image layers with dive to identify which layer added malicious content, compare with the official base image using container-diff, check image history for suspicious RUN commands, scan for embedded backdoors and cryptocurrency miners, trace the image pull from registry logs.
Scenario 3: Container Escape Investigation Check if container ran privileged or with dangerous capabilities, examine host filesystem mount points for unauthorized access, review Docker socket mount enabling Docker-in-Docker abuse, analyze host system logs for container escape indicators, check for kernel exploit artifacts.
Scenario 4: Cryptojacking in Container Environment Identify high-CPU containers, export and analyze the container image for mining binaries, check for unauthorized images in the registry, review container creation events for rogue deployments, examine network connections for mining pool communications.
Output Format
Docker
Truncated for display — read the full file on GitHub.
Related Skills
Agent-Reach
85.4kGive your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Read & search Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu — one CLI, zero API fees.
LocalAI
49.3kLocalAI is the open-source AI engine. Run any model - LLMs, vision, voice, image, video - on any hardware. No GPU required.
algorithmic-art
177.9kCreating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems.
pptx
177.9kUse this skill any time a .pptx or .potx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx or .potx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an em…
Languages
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
