business-idea-validator
Pressure-test a business or side-hustle idea before you sink money and months into it — find the real demand, the risky assumptions, and the cheapest way to test them
Install / Use
npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill business-idea-validatorInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
SKILL.md
Installable skill definition
Quality Score
Category
Development & EngineeringSupported Platforms
Tags
Our assessment of business-idea-validator
business-idea-validator scores 82/100 on our quality scale, 2904th of 4,658 Development & Engineering skills we index.
Its SKILL.md is 4.6 KB long, well organised into 9 sections and no code examples: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.
With 1,396 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.
Maintenance, license and trust
- The repository was last updated 8 days ago, so business-idea-validator is actively maintained.
- It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
- Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
business-idea-validator compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than business-idea-validator; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| business-idea-validator (this skill)by mohitagw15856 | 82 | 1.4k | 8d ago | SKILL.md |
| ai-job-searchby MadsLorentzen | 100 | 44.8k | today | CLAUDE.md |
| claude-howtoby luongnv89 | 100 | 41.7k | 2d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| algorithmic-artby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 10d ago | SKILL.md |
| pptxby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 10d ago | SKILL.md |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install business-idea-validator?
- Run
npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill business-idea-validator. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does business-idea-validator work with?
- It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is business-idea-validator safe to use?
- It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is business-idea-validator still maintained?
- The repository was last updated 8 days ago, so business-idea-validator is actively maintained.
Skill content
View source on GitHubname: business-idea-validator description: "Pressure-test a business or side-hustle idea before you sink money and months into it — find the real demand, the risky assumptions, and the cheapest way to test them. Use when asked to validate my business idea, is this a good business idea, test my side hustle, or should I start this. Produces a read on the core assumptions the idea depends on, who the customer really is and whether the pain is real, the cheapest experiments to test demand before building, a rough viability check (market, competition, economics), and a go/refine/rethink call — honest, not a cheerleader."
Business-Idea Validator
Most business ideas fail not from bad execution but from building something nobody wanted — a problem you can catch before spending the money. This pressure-tests your idea: it surfaces the assumptions it secretly depends on, checks whether the customer and pain are real, and designs the cheapest experiments to find out — so you validate demand before you build, and get an honest call, not applause.
What This Skill Produces
- The core assumptions — what has to be true for this to work (the customer exists, the pain is real, they'll pay, you can reach them, the economics work)
- A customer & pain check — who the real buyer is and whether the problem is painful enough to pay to solve
- Cheap validation experiments — the fastest, lowest-cost ways to test demand before building (conversations, a landing page, pre-sales, a manual/concierge version)
- A viability read — rough market size, competition, and whether the unit economics could work
- A go / refine / rethink call — honest, based on the evidence and the riskiest assumptions
- The riskiest assumption to test first — where to point your first experiment
Required Inputs
Ask for these if not provided:
- The idea — what it is, who it's for, and the problem it solves
- The customer — who you think will pay, and why
- Your evidence — any real signal so far (interest, sales, competitors)
- Your stake — time/money you'd commit, and your risk tolerance
- Your goal — a side hustle, a real business, or just testing the water
Framework: Test The Assumptions, Cheaply, First
- Surface the hidden assumptions. Every idea rests on beliefs — that a specific customer has a painful problem, will pay, and can be reached affordably. Name them.
- Interrogate the customer and pain. Is the buyer specific and real, and is the pain strong enough that they'll pay? "Nice to have" ideas die here.
- Design cheap experiments. Before building anything, test demand the fast way: talk to real potential buyers, put up a landing page, attempt pre-sales, or run a manual "concierge" version.
- Sanity-check viability. Rough market size, existing competition (its presence can validate demand), and whether the numbers could plausibly work.
- Test the riskiest assumption first. Point the first, cheapest experiment at the thing most likely to kill the idea — don't validate the easy parts.
- Give an honest call. Go, refine (pivot the weak assumption), or rethink — based on evidence, not enthusiasm. Be a critic, not a cheerleader.
Output Format
Idea validation: [idea] · for [customer] · stake [x]
Core assumptions: [customer exists · pain is real · they'll pay · reachable · economics work]. Customer & pain: [who really pays] · pain level: [must-have / nice-to-have]. Cheapest tests (before building): [customer conversations · landing page · pre-sale · concierge version]. Viability: market [rough] · competition [signal] · economics [plausible?]. Riskiest assumption to test first: [x]. Call: [go / refine / rethink] — because [evidence].
Quality Checks
- [ ] Surfaces the idea's hidden assumptions
- [ ] Interrogates whether the customer and pain are real/payable
- [ ] Prescribes cheap experiments before building
- [ ] Includes a rough viability read (market, competition, economics)
- [ ] Identifies the riskiest assumption to test first
- [ ] Gives an honest go/refine/rethink call, not cheerleading
Anti-Patterns
- Cheerleading the idea instead of stress-testing it.
- Jumping to build before testing demand.
- Vague "big market" with no real customer/pain.
- Testing the easy assumptions and ignoring the killer one.
- Confusing personal excitement with market demand.
Example Trigger Phrases
- "Is this a good business idea? Help me validate it."
- "I want to start a side hustle doing X — is there demand?"
- "How do I test my business idea cheaply before committing?"
- "Pressure-test my startup idea honestly."
- "Should I actually start this, or am I kidding myself?"
Related Skills
ai-job-search
44.8kThe job search that runs on your machine. AI job application framework built on Claude Code: evaluate postings, tailor CVs, write cover letters, prep interviews. Fork it and own it.
claude-howto
41.7kA visual, example-driven guide to Claude Code — from basic concepts to advanced agents, with copy-paste templates that bring immediate value.
algorithmic-art
177.9kCreating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems.
pptx
177.9kUse this skill any time a .pptx or .potx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx or .potx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an em…
Languages
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
