---

name: bug-diagnosis description: "Diagnose a bug systematically instead of guessing — reproduce, isolate, form hypotheses, and test them to root cause. Use when debugging, chasing a defect, an intermittent failure, or 'why is this happening?'. Produces a structured diagnosis: a reliable repro, the narrowed-down location, ranked hypotheses with how to test each, and the root cause + fix once found."

Bug Diagnosis Skill

The slowest way to fix a bug is to start changing code and hope. This skill runs a disciplined diagnostic loop: reproduce it reliably, isolate where it happens, hypothesize why, and test the cheapest hypothesis first — narrowing until the root cause is proven, not guessed. It produces a fix and an explanation of why the bug existed.

Required Inputs

Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:

• The symptom — what's wrong: expected vs. actual behavior, error/stack trace, when it started.
• Repro steps — how to trigger it (or "can't reliably reproduce yet").
• Context — recent changes, environment, frequency (always / intermittent / specific inputs).
• What's been tried — so we don't repeat dead ends.

Output Format

Diagnosis: [bug]

1. Reproduce — the minimal, reliable steps to trigger it. If it's intermittent, the plan to make it deterministic (fixed input/seed, added logging, narrowed conditions). No fixing until it reproduces.

2. Isolate — narrow where it happens: bisect (git bisect / comment-out / binary search the input), check the boundaries (what's the last known-good point vs. first bad). State the smallest scope that still shows the bug.

3. Hypotheses (ranked) — likely causes, most-probable-and-cheapest-to-test first:

| Hypothesis | Why plausible | How to test it (the cheap check) | Verdict | |---|---|---|---|

Test them in order; record what each rules in or out.

4. Root cause — the proven cause (not a symptom), with the evidence that confirms it.

5. Fix & guard — the fix, a test that fails before it and passes after (lock the bug out), and any nearby instances of the same mistake.

Quality Checks

• [ ] A reliable reproduction exists before any fix is attempted
• [ ] The location is isolated by bisection/narrowing, not guessed
• [ ] Hypotheses are ranked by likelihood × cheapness and tested in order
• [ ] The stated cause is the root cause with evidence — not just the surface symptom
• [ ] A regression test is added that fails before the fix and passes after

Anti-Patterns

• [ ] Do not start changing code before the bug reliably reproduces
• [ ] Do not fix the symptom and stop — trace to the underlying cause
• [ ] Do not change several things at once — you won't know what fixed it (or hid it)
• [ ] Do not skip the regression test — an unguarded bug comes back
• [ ] Do not ignore "what's been tried" — re-running dead ends wastes the loop

Based On

Systematic debugging method (reproduce → isolate → hypothesize → verify) — Zeller's Why Programs Fail / scientific-method debugging.