SkillAgentSearch skills...

app-builder

Builds and edits a model-driven Power Apps app from a natural-language intent — tables, columns, relationships, adaptive forms with sub-grids, views, Choice-column charts, business rules, business process flows, generative page intents for overview/dashboard surfaces (page `.tsx` generated in genera…

Install / Use

npx skills add microsoft/power-platform-skills --skill app-builder

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

85/100

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of app-builder

app-builder scores 85/100 on our quality scale, 2679th of 4,600 Development & Engineering skills we index.

Its SKILL.md is 50 KB long, well organised into 16 sections with 6 code examples: long enough that it reads more like full documentation than a focused instruction file, which agents can find harder to follow.

It has 919 GitHub stars, a meaningful sign that others use it.

Substance
21/30
Structure
20/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
13/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 12 days ago, so app-builder is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

app-builder compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than app-builder; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
app-builder (this skill)by microsoft8591912d agoSKILL.md
ai-job-searchby MadsLorentzen10045.1k1d agoCLAUDE.md
claude-howtoby luongnv8910041.8k6d agoCLAUDE.md
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k14d agoSKILL.md
pptxby anthropics100177.9k14d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install app-builder?
Run npx skills add microsoft/power-platform-skills --skill app-builder. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does app-builder work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is app-builder safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is app-builder still maintained?
The repository was last updated 12 days ago, so app-builder is actively maintained.

name: app-builder version: 1.0.0 description: Builds and edits a model-driven Power Apps app from a natural-language intent — tables, columns, relationships, adaptive forms with sub-grids, views, Choice-column charts, business rules, business process flows, generative page intents for overview/dashboard surfaces (page .tsx generated in generate-pages after plan approval), and an app module + sitemap — via the headless cds-maker-sdk. Runs an interactive, multi-turn authoring flow (env selection, jobs-to-be-done first, then design-only App Spec authoring across confirmed levels, guardrail lint, plan-mode approval, generate-pages, full build) and a narrated build, and can download a deployed app back into an editable spec to change it. Use when the user says "build an app for X", "create a model-driven app", "make me an app to manage Y", "add a business process flow", or "edit/add to my app". This skill stands alone and does not require /genpage — but for a standalone generative page added to an app that already exists, use /genpage instead. author: Microsoft Corporation argument-hint: "<app description>" user-invocable: true allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep, Task, AskUserQuestion, EnterPlanMode, ExitPlanMode, TaskCreate, TaskUpdate, TaskList, read, edit, execute, search, agent, todo

Plugin check: Run node "${PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/check-version.js" — if it outputs a message, show it to the user before proceeding.

app-builder — intent → model-driven app

Turn a natural-language intent into a deployed model-driven app. You author a reviewable App Spec (JSON) with the user across confirmed turns, then a deterministic engine (cds-maker-sdk, vendored) builds it — tables/columns/relationships, sample data, views, Choice-column charts, adaptive forms with sub-grids, generative pages for overview/dashboard surfaces, and the app module + sitemap. The same spec drives create and edit: download a deployed app back into a spec, change it, and re-run the build (it's idempotent).

CRITICAL — run the interactive flow in THIS conversation (the main loop)

You MUST run the authoring questions and the build narration yourself, in the main conversation. Do NOT dispatch a subagent (Task) for the interactive steps.

A subagent is headless — AskUserQuestion and plan mode do not reach the user from inside one (its only output is its final message). The whole point of this skill is the multi-turn, propose-then-confirm experience, so every AskUserQuestion, EnterPlanMode, and live build status line must originate here, in the main loop.

CRITICAL — the user sees your chat message, NOT tool output

Shell/tool output — the result of running preview-app.js, a dry-run plan, or a lint — is COLLAPSED BY DEFAULT in the UI. The user does NOT see it unless they manually expand the tool panel. Running the command is therefore NOT the same as showing the user. Every artifact the user must read, review, or approve — the whole-app preview wireframes, the dry-run build plan, and blocking lint findings — MUST be reproduced verbatim in your chat reply, inside a fenced ``` code block. Never say "the preview looks right" and leave the content buried in a collapsed panel: paste it into your message. This is the #1 cause of "the wireframes aren't visible" — the preview ran, but its output stayed hidden.

Capabilities — the full toolbox (pick best-fit per requirement)

You are a complete model-driven app builder, not a single-surface tool. Everything below ships in one App Spec and one build — choose what best serves the user's requirement to make a useful, prod-ready app; don't under-build (a bare table list) or over-build (surfaces nobody asked for):

  • Data model — tables (give each custom table a meaningful Fluent-style SVG table icon by default; propose what the glyph will depict in words — never a Fluent token name — and record it as iconDescription before drawing the SVG — see references/authoring-flow.md → Table icons), columns (all types), relationships (1:N / N:N + junctions), sample data
  • Record UI — forms (sub-grids, quick-create / quick-view), views (with enriched default columns), charts
  • Custom grid rendering (preview) — entities[].columns[].visualization: render a column as a RadialDial, LineChart, HeatMap or StarRating in every grid and view that shows it, instead of plain text. Reach for it when a column is a magnitude a user scans (a score, a utilization %, a rating, a priority) rather than a value they read exactly — it makes a list scannable at a glance for one line of spec. It is per-column, so set it once on the column, not on each view. Preview: on an environment where it is not provisioned the build skips it and everything else still deploys, so it is always safe to include.
  • Actions — modern command-bar buttons (incl. flyout / split menus), web resources (form JS / HTML / CSS). Two rules when writing that JS, both learned from buttons that deployed perfectly and then did nothing: a command handler is handed the record (function doThing(primaryControl)) — the build supplies the parameter, so write that signature; and never hardcode Choice values like 100000003, because they are assigned per publisher. Resolve by label via getOptions() (see references/app-spec-schema-advanced.md → webResources). Note also that command and web-resource edits do not redeploy on rebuild — the phases reuse what exists, so changing a button or a script means deleting it first.
  • Form logic without code — businessRules[]: show/hide, lock/unlock, set-required and set-value, driven by a condition on the record. Reach for a business rule before form JS when the requirement is field-level and declarative — it is visible in the maker, survives solution export, and needs no web resource. Use form JS when the logic needs a real API call, cross-record work, or anything beyond the four supported actions.
  • Guided processes — businessProcessFlows[]: the staged bar across the top of a record (ordered stages, each with steps bound to that table's columns — every step must bind a field; the platform rejects one without, so use a Boolean flag for a manual check-off). Reach for one when the user describes work moving through phases — "triage → investigate → resolve", "lead → qualify → close". Author it Active (the default) or the stage bar does not appear at all. Who may run a flow is securityRoles: { "personas": [...] } (Active flows only). v1 is single-entity and linear: cross-entity stages, branching and stage actions are rejected by the spec gate, so offer Maker for those rather than writing them into the spec.
  • Surfaces — generative pages (modern dashboards / overviews / analytics / landing — the default), classic dashboards (opt-in), external URLs
  • App shell — the app module + sitemap, with per-subarea icons. Turn on the modern shell with app.newLook: true unless the user asks for the classic one; it is opt-in and best-effort, so a tenant without the setting still gets a working app. app.headerNavigationRefresh controls the Wave 2 header/navigation refresh — a separate, independent setting whose platform default is ON, so set it to false only when the user explicitly wants the classic header.
  • Security & access — one security role per persona, sized from that persona's jobs-to-be-done (the entity access each job needs, unioned into the role), so the app opens for non-admins.
  • AI-first features (admin-gated) — form-fill assist, natural-language grid/view search, NL chart / AI data visualization, M365 Copilot (opt-in); per-table Copilot row summaries (Insight Cards) with tailored prompts, auto-selected for good-candidate tables

Author the smallest spec that fully satisfies the ask, then let the user refine. The Genpage-first policy below is the record-vs-dashboard rule; references/app-spec-schema.md documents every field.

Genpage-first policy (surface classification)

Every app surface is one of two kinds — enumerate the app's surfaces and classify each one, don't decide page-by-page in passing:

  • Record surfaces (create/read/update/list a table's rows) → a model-driven form + view.
  • Everything else — overview/landing, dashboard, KPIs, analytics, guided or wizard flow, composite or comparison screen → a generative page (pages[]), not a classic dashboard.

Rules:

  • An app whose jobs include an overview, a queue, analytics or a guided flow but which proposes no pages has missed a surface. Where the app genuinely is record-CRUD only, say so explicitly rather than silently omitting pages.
  • A traditional dashboards[] is emitted only on explicit request (e.g. "use a classic dashboard").
  • A generative page is authored as a design intent (source: { kind: "intent" }, schemaVersion: 2) during Phase 1 — its .tsx is written in Phase 1.5 — Generate pages, after plan approval and after the data pre-build creates the tables so pac model genpage generate-types can emit RuntimeTypes.ts. See references/authoring-flow.md → Pages.
  • The build's pages phase uploads each page via pac model genpage upload without --add-to-sitemap — the SDK is the single sitemap writer, so a page's nav entry comes from a page subarea in appShell (referenced by the page's key). See references/app-spec-schema.md → pages[].
  • Every page in pages[] must be sitemap-placed — validation rejects any page absent from the sitemap. A "detail" page that receives a caller-supplied id is a normal sitemap page; it reads its input via pageInput?.data?.<field>. Navigation-only (headless) pages are not supported.
  • A page that declares pageInput MUST declare directEntry. Because every page is sitemap-placed, a detail page is also reachable straight from the app navigation with no input — a state a user reaches by clicking. Say what happens then: { "behavior": "selector" } shows a picker and then the record, { "behavior": "emptyState" } explains and renders nothing broken. Prefer selector when the table is browsable; it is the more useful landing. Every key in pageInput.data must also be produced by some page's navigatesTo[].data, or the generated page reads a key nothing ever sets.
  • Three-authority page identity (build + download + verify all follow this): (1) IDENTITY — the durable <app>_pagemanifest (key → pageId); a downloaded spec's own pages[].pageId outranks it for that rebuild. (2) EXISTENCE — env-wide pac model genpage list (crash-safe; decides create-vs-reuse). (3) MEMBERSHIP — the app's sitemap GenPageId set (placement, download enumeration, verify coverage). All matching is by id — never by display name.
  • Multi-page navigation uses PAGEREF_<key> (the stable pages[].key) as the pageId placeholder; the build resolves each to the real page GUID in a run-scoped staging copy (the canonical .tsx is never mutated), then verifies every nav edge resolves to the deployed page's GenPageId.

Workflow

Phase 0 — Working directory

  1. Derive a short kebab-case slug from $ARGUMENTS (e.g. "Project Tracker" → project-tracker).
  2. Create the directory (mkdir -p <slug> on bash/PowerShell; mkdir <slug> on cmd, which has no -p and errors if it exists) and resolve its absolute path. It holds app-spec.json, model-app-plan.md, and workflow-log.md.

Phase 1 — Author the App Spec (interactive, main loop)

Follow **[references/authorin

Truncated for display — read the full file on GitHub.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars919
CategoryDevelopment
Updated12d ago
Forks186

Languages

JavaScript

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions