Modular Monolith with DDD

Full Modular Monolith .NET application with Domain-Driven Design approach.

Announcement

Learn, use and benefit from this project only if:

• You condemn Russia and its military aggression against Ukraine
• You recognize that Russia is an occupant that unlawfully invaded a sovereign state
• You support Ukraine's territorial integrity, including its claims over temporarily occupied territories of Crimea and Donbas
• You reject false narratives perpetuated by Russian state propaganda

Otherwise, leave this project immediately and educate yourself.

Putin, idi nachuj.

CI

FrontEnd application

FrontEnd application : Modular Monolith With DDD: FrontEnd React application

Table of contents

1. Introduction

  1.1 Purpose of this Repository

  1.2 Out of Scope

  1.3 Reason

  1.4 Disclaimer

  1.5 Give a Star

  1.6 Share It

2. Domain

  2.1 Description

  2.2 Conceptual Model

  2.3 Event Storming

3. Architecture

  3.0 C4 Model

  3.1 High Level View

  3.2 Module Level View

  3.3 API and Module Communication

  3.4 Module Requests Processing via CQRS

  3.5 Domain Model Principles and Attributes

  3.6 Cross-Cutting Concerns

  3.7 Modules Integration

  3.8 Internal Processing

  3.9 Security

  3.10 Unit Tests

  3.11 Architecture Decision Log

  3.12 Architecture Unit Tests

  3.13 Integration Tests

  3.14 System Integration Testing

  3.15 Event Sourcing

  3.16 Database change management

  3.17 Continuous Integration

  3.18 Static code analysis

  3.19 System Under Test SUT

  3.20 Mutation Testing

4. Technology

5. How to Run

6. Contribution

7. Roadmap

8. Authors

9. License

10. Inspirations and Recommendations

1. Introduction

1.1 Purpose of this Repository

This is a list of the main goals of this repository:

• Showing how you can implement a monolith application in a modular way
• Presentation of the full implementation of an application
  • This is not another simple application
  • This is not another proof of concept (PoC)
  • The goal is to present the implementation of an application that would be ready to run in production
• Showing the application of best practices and object-oriented programming principles
• Presentation of the use of design patterns. When, how and why they can be used
• Presentation of some architectural considerations, decisions, approaches
• Presentation of the implementation using Domain-Driven Design approach (tactical patterns)
• Presentation of the implementation of Unit Tests for Domain Model (Testable Design in mind)
• Presentation of the implementation of Integration Tests
• Presentation of the implementation of Event Sourcing
• Presentation of C4 Model
• Presentation of diagram as text approach

1.2 Out of Scope

This is a list of subjects which are out of scope for this repository:

• Business requirements gathering and analysis
• System analysis
• Domain exploration
• Domain distillation
• Domain-Driven Design strategic patterns
• Architecture evaluation, quality attributes analysis
• Integration, system tests
• Project management
• Infrastructure
• Containerization
• Software engineering process
• Deployment process
• Maintenance
• Documentation

1.3 Reason

The reason for creating this repository is the lack of something similar. Most sample applications on GitHub have at least one of the following issues:

• Very, very simple - few entities and use cases implemented
• Not finished (for example there is no authentication, logging, etc..)
• Poorly designed (in my opinion)
• Poorly implemented (in my opinion)
• Not well described
• Assumptions and decisions are not clearly explained
• Implements "Orders" domain - yes, everyone knows this domain, but something different is needed
• Implemented in old technology
• Not maintained

To sum up, there are some very good examples, but there are far too few of them. This repository has the task of filling this gap at some level.

1.4 Disclaimer

Software architecture should always be created to resolve specific business problems. Software architecture always supports some quality attributes and at the same time does not support others. A lot of other factors influence your software architecture - your team, opinions, preferences, experiences, technical constraints, time, budget, etc.

Always functional requirements, quality attributes, technical constraints and other factors should be considered before an architectural decision is made.

Because of the above, the architecture and implementation presented in this repository is one of the many ways to solve some problems. Take from this repository as much as you want, use it as you like but remember to always pick the best solution which is appropriate to the problem class you have.

1.5 Give a Star

My primary focus in this project is on quality. Creating a good quality product involves a lot of analysis, research and work. It takes a lot of time. If you like this project, learned something or you are using it in your applications, please give it a star :star:. This is the best motivation for me to continue this work. Thanks!

1.6 Share It

There are very few really good examples of this type of application. If you think this repository makes a difference and is worth it, please share it with your friends and on social networks. I will be extremely grateful.

2. Domain

2.1 Description

Definition:

Domain - A sphere of knowledge, influence, or activity. The subject area to which the user applies a program is the domain of the software. Domain-Driven Design Reference, Eric Evans

The Meeting Groups domain was selected for the purposes of this project based on the Meetup.com system.

Main reasons for selecting this domain:

• It is common, a lot of people use the Meetup site to organize or attend meetings
• There is a system for it, so everyone can check this implementation against a working site which supports this domain
• It is not complex so it is easy to understand
• It is not trivial - there are some business rules and logic and it is not just CRUD operations
• You don't need much specific domain knowledge unlike other domains like financing, banking, medical
• It is not big so it is easier to implement

Meetings

The main business entities are Member, Meeting Group and Meeting. A Member can create a Meeting Group, be part of a Meeting Group or can attend a Meeting.

A Meeting Group Member can be an Organizer of this group or a normal Member.

Only an Organizer of a Meeting Group can create a new Meeting.

A Meeting has attendees, not attendees (Members which declare they will not attend the Meeting) and Members on the Waitlist.

A Meeting can have an attendee limit. If the limit is reached, Members can only sign up to the Waitlist.

A Meeting Attendee can bring guests to the Meeting. The number of guests allowed is an attribute of the Meeting. Bringing guests can be unallowed.

A Meeting Attendee can have one of two roles: Attendee or Host. A Meeting must have at least one Host. The Host is a special role which grants permission to edit Meeting information or change the attendees list.

A Member can comment Meetings. A Member can reply to, like other Comments. Organizer manages commenting of Meeting by Meeting Commenting Configuration. Organizer can delete any Comment.

Each Meeting Group must have an organizer with active Subscription. One organizer can cover 3 Meeting Groups by his Subscription.

Additionally, Meeting organizer can set an Event Fee. Each Meeting Attendee is obliged to pay the fee. All guests should be paid by Meeting Attendee too.

Administration

To create a new Meeting Group, a Member needs to propose the group. A Meeting Group Proposal is sent to Administrators. An Administrator can accept or reject a Meeting Group Proposal. If a Meeting Group Proposal is accepted, a Meeting Group is created.

Payments

Each Member who is the Payer can buy the Subscription. He needs to pay the Subscription Payment. Subscription can expire so Subscription Renewal is required (by Subscription Renewal Payment payment to keep Subscription active).

When the Meeting fee is required, the Payer needs to pay `Meeting Fee