SkillAgentSearch skills...

Jsonq

simple json field access for golang

Install / Use

/learn @jmoiron/Jsonq
About this skill

Quality Score

0/100

Supported Platforms

Universal

README

jsonq

Build Status Godoc license

Simplify your golang json usage by extracting fields or items from arrays and objects with a simple, hierarchical query. API Documentation on godoc.org.

This package is meant to make working with complex feeds a bit more easy. If you have simple feeds you want to model with struct types, check out jflect, which will create struct definitions given a json document.

installing

go get github.com/jmoiron/jsonq

usage

Given some json data like:

{
	"foo": 1,
	"bar": 2,
	"test": "Hello, world!",
	"baz": 123.1,
	"array": [
		{"foo": 1},
		{"bar": 2},
		{"baz": 3}
	],
	"subobj": {
		"foo": 1,
		"subarray": [1,2,3],
		"subsubobj": {
			"bar": 2,
			"baz": 3,
			"array": ["hello", "world"]
		}
	},
	"bool": true
}

Decode it into a map[string]interface{}:

import (
	"strings"
	"encoding/json"
	"github.com/jmoiron/jsonq"
)

data := map[string]interface{}{}
dec := json.NewDecoder(strings.NewReader(jsonstring))
dec.Decode(&data)
jq := jsonq.NewQuery(data)

From here, you can query along different keys and indexes:

// data["foo"] -> 1
jq.Int("foo")

// data["subobj"]["subarray"][1] -> 2
jq.Int("subobj", "subarray", "1")

// data["subobj"]["subarray"]["array"][0] -> "hello"
jq.String("subobj", "subsubobj", "array", "0")

// data["subobj"] -> map[string]interface{}{"subobj": ...}
obj, err := jq.Object("subobj")

Missing keys, out of bounds indexes, and type failures will return errors. For simplicity, integer keys (ie, {"0": "zero"}) are inaccessible by jsonq as integer strings are assumed to be array indexes.

The Int and Float methods will attempt to parse numbers from string values to ease the use of many real world feeds which deliver numbers as strings.

Suggestions/comments please tweet @jmoiron

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars588
CategoryDevelopment
Updated17d ago
Forks69

Languages

Go

Security Score

95/100

Audited on Mar 14, 2026

No findings