SkillAgentSearch skills...

code

Use BEFORE generating, refactoring, reviewing, or debugging code. Trigger phrases include "write a function/script/class for X", "review this code/diff/PR", "refactor this", "debug this error", "is this implementation correct", "what's wrong with this code", "improve this code", "translate from X to…

Install / Use

npx skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill ejentum-code

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

69/100

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of code

code scores 69/100 on our quality scale, 2737th of 3,554 Development & Engineering skills we index.

Its SKILL.md is 2.4 KB long, lightly structured (1 heading) and no code examples: moderately detailed.

With 2,785 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
20/30
Structure
5/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
15/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 5 days ago, so code is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

code compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than code; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
code (this skill)by jeremylongshore692.8k5d agoSKILL.md
Agent-Reachby Panniantong10086.1k14d agoCLAUDE.md
headroomby headroomlabs-ai10074.1ktodayCLAUDE.md
rufloby ruvnet10073.5ktodayCLAUDE.md
CowAgentby zhayujie10047.2ktodayCLAUDE.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install code?
Run npx skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill code. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does code work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is code safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is code still maintained?
The repository was last updated 5 days ago, so code is actively maintained.

name: code description: Use BEFORE generating, refactoring, reviewing, or debugging code. Trigger phrases include "write a function/script/class for X", "review this code/diff/PR", "refactor this", "debug this error", "is this implementation correct", "what's wrong with this code", "improve this code", "translate from X to Y", or any prompt with a code block the user wants you to act on. Also fires when planning architectural changes, picking algorithms or data structures, or evaluating dependency upgrades. Calls the code MCP tool to retrieve an engineering scaffold (failure pattern, procedure, correct-pattern example, verification step) before generating. Catches hallucinated APIs, lost edge cases, premature algorithm commitment, silent contract violations, refactors that change behavior masked by passing tests. Do NOT trigger for pure code reading with no action requested, simple syntax questions, file system operations, running existing tests, or confirming an existing pattern is fine. allowed-tools: mcp__ejentum__code version: 1.0.0 author: Ejentum info@ejentum.com license: MIT compatibility: Requires the ejentum-mcp MCP server installed and EJENTUM_API_KEY env var set. Free and paid tiers at ejentum.com. tags: [community, ai-tools, code-review, cognitive-scaffold, mcp]

Code Harness

When this skill triggers, call the code tool from the ejentum MCP server. Pass a 1-2 sentence framing of WHAT you are coding or reviewing as the query argument. Include the failure risk to avoid where possible.

Good query: review a Python refactor that converts raise UserNotFound to silent default return; tests still pass Bad query: look at this code

The tool returns a structured scaffold containing:

  • [CODE FAILURE]: engineering failure pattern to avoid
  • [ENGINEERING PROCEDURE]: steps to follow
  • [REASONING TOPOLOGY]: decision flow
  • [CORRECT PATTERN]: shape correct code should take
  • [VERIFICATION]: self-check
  • Amplify: and Suppress: signals

Absorb internally. Do NOT echo bracket labels in the user-facing reply. Apply the scaffold's failure-pattern check against your draft before responding; if your code exhibits the named failure, rewrite.

If the API is unreachable, proceed with native engineering. The scaffold enhances; it is not a hard dependency.

Latency cost: ~1 second. Benefit: catches the kinds of behavioral changes and silent contract violations that look plausible but break under real conditions.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars2.8k
CategoryDevelopment
Updated5d ago
Forks404

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions