hexagonal-architecture
Design, implement, and refactor Ports & Adapters systems with clear domain boundaries, dependency inversion, and testable use-case orchestration across TypeScript, Java, Kotlin, and Go services.
Install / Use
npx skills add jaysonpantollana/Citadel --skill hexagonal-architectureInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
SKILL.md
Installable skill definition
Quality Score
Category
Development & EngineeringSupported Platforms
Our assessment of hexagonal-architecture
hexagonal-architecture scores 69/100 on our quality scale, 3848th of 4,651 Development & Engineering skills we index.
Its SKILL.md is 11 KB long, well organised into 23 sections with 6 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.
It has no GitHub stars yet, so there is no community track record; judge it on its content.
Maintenance, license and trust
- We could not determine when the repository was last updated.
- Our last check on 2026-09-27 found the source still online.
- No license is declared. By default that means all rights are reserved: you can read it, but reusing or redistributing it is not clearly permitted. Ask the author before building on it commercially.
- Its trust signals score 68/100, with 3 cautions from licensing, adoption, age or documentation. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
Safety scan
No issues foundOur scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful.
AI review by kimi-k2.7-code on 2026-09-25. Automated pattern scan on 2026-09-24. It catches known dangerous patterns, not every risk — read a skill before letting an agent act on it.
hexagonal-architecture compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than hexagonal-architecture; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| hexagonal-architecture (this skill)by jaysonpantollana | 69 | 0 | — | SKILL.md |
| taste-skillby Leonxlnx | 100 | 112.1k | today | CLAUDE.md |
| rufloby ruvnet | 100 | 81.3k | today | CLAUDE.md |
| headroomby headroomlabs-ai | 100 | 79.2k | 1d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| ai-job-searchby ai-job-search-dev | 100 | 70.6k | today | CLAUDE.md |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install hexagonal-architecture?
- Run
npx skills add jaysonpantollana/Citadel --skill hexagonal-architecture. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does hexagonal-architecture work with?
- It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is hexagonal-architecture safe to use?
- Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful. It declares no license and scores 68/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is hexagonal-architecture still maintained?
- We could not determine when the repository was last updated.
Skill content
View source on GitHubname: hexagonal-architecture description: Design, implement, and refactor Ports & Adapters systems with clear domain boundaries, dependency inversion, and testable use-case orchestration across TypeScript, Java, Kotlin, and Go services. metadata: origin: ECC
Hexagonal Architecture
Hexagonal architecture (Ports and Adapters) keeps business logic independent from frameworks, transport, and persistence details. The core app depends on abstract ports, and adapters implement those ports at the edges.
When to Use
- Building new features where long-term maintainability and testability matter.
- Refactoring layered or framework-heavy code where domain logic is mixed with I/O concerns.
- Supporting multiple interfaces for the same use case (HTTP, CLI, queue workers, cron jobs).
- Replacing infrastructure (database, external APIs, message bus) without rewriting business rules.
Use this skill when the request involves boundaries, domain-centric design, refactoring tightly coupled services, or decoupling application logic from specific libraries.
Core Concepts
- Domain model: Business rules and entities/value objects. No framework imports.
- Use cases (application layer): Orchestrate domain behavior and workflow steps.
- Inbound ports: Contracts describing what the application can do (commands/queries/use-case interfaces).
- Outbound ports: Contracts for dependencies the application needs (repositories, gateways, event publishers, clock, UUID, etc.).
- Adapters: Infrastructure and delivery implementations of ports (HTTP controllers, DB repositories, queue consumers, SDK wrappers).
- Composition root: Single wiring location where concrete adapters are bound to use cases.
Outbound port interfaces usually live in the application layer (or in domain only when the abstraction is truly domain-level), while infrastructure adapters implement them.
Dependency direction is always inward:
- Adapters -> application/domain
- Application -> port interfaces (inbound/outbound contracts)
- Domain -> domain-only abstractions (no framework or infrastructure dependencies)
- Domain -> nothing external
How It Works
Step 1: Model a use case boundary
Define a single use case with a clear input and output DTO. Keep transport details (Express req, GraphQL context, job payload wrappers) outside this boundary.
Step 2: Define outbound ports first
Identify every side effect as a port:
- persistence (
UserRepositoryPort) - external calls (
BillingGatewayPort) - cross-cutting (
LoggerPort,ClockPort)
Ports should model capabilities, not technologies.
Step 3: Implement the use case with pure orchestration
Use case class/function receives ports via constructor/arguments. It validates application-level invariants, coordinates domain rules, and returns plain data structures.
Step 4: Build adapters at the edge
- Inbound adapter converts protocol input to use-case input.
- Outbound adapter maps app contracts to concrete APIs/ORM/query builders.
- Mapping stays in adapters, not inside use cases.
Step 5: Wire everything in a composition root
Instantiate adapters, then inject them into use cases. Keep this wiring centralized to avoid hidden service-locator behavior.
Step 6: Test per boundary
- Unit test use cases with fake ports.
- Integration test adapters with real infra dependencies.
- E2E test user-facing flows through inbound adapters.
Architecture Diagram
flowchart LR
Client["Client (HTTP/CLI/Worker)"] --> InboundAdapter["Inbound Adapter"]
InboundAdapter -->|"calls"| UseCase["UseCase (Application Layer)"]
UseCase -->|"uses"| OutboundPort["OutboundPort (Interface)"]
OutboundAdapter["Outbound Adapter"] -->|"implements"| OutboundPort
OutboundAdapter --> ExternalSystem["DB/API/Queue"]
UseCase --> DomainModel["DomainModel"]
Suggested Module Layout
Use feature-first organization with explicit boundaries:
src/
features/
orders/
domain/
Order.ts
OrderPolicy.ts
application/
ports/
inbound/
CreateOrder.ts
outbound/
OrderRepositoryPort.ts
PaymentGatewayPort.ts
use-cases/
CreateOrderUseCase.ts
adapters/
inbound/
http/
createOrderRoute.ts
outbound/
postgres/
PostgresOrderRepository.ts
stripe/
StripePaymentGateway.ts
composition/
ordersContainer.ts
TypeScript Example
Port definitions
export interface OrderRepositoryPort {
save(order: Order): Promise<void>;
findById(orderId: string): Promise<Order | null>;
}
export interface PaymentGatewayPort {
authorize(input: { orderId: string; amountCents: number }): Promise<{ authorizationId: string }>;
}
Use case
type CreateOrderInput = {
orderId: string;
amountCents: number;
};
type CreateOrderOutput = {
orderId: string;
authorizationId: string;
};
export class CreateOrderUseCase {
constructor(
private readonly orderRepository: OrderRepositoryPort,
private readonly paymentGateway: PaymentGatewayPort
) {}
async execute(input: CreateOrderInput): Promise<CreateOrderOutput> {
const order = Order.create({ id: input.orderId, amountCents: input.amountCents });
const auth = await this.paymentGateway.authorize({
orderId: order.id,
amountCents: order.amountCents,
});
// markAuthorized returns a new Order instance; it does not mutate in place.
const authorizedOrder = order.markAuthorized(auth.authorizationId);
await this.orderRepository.save(authorizedOrder);
return {
orderId: order.id,
authorizationId: auth.authorizationId,
};
}
}
Outbound adapter
export class PostgresOrderRepository implements OrderRepositoryPort {
constructor(private readonly db: SqlClient) {}
async save(order: Order): Promise<void> {
await this.db.query(
"insert into orders (id, amount_cents, status, authorization_id) values ($1, $2, $3, $4)",
[order.id, order.amountCents, order.status, order.authorizationId]
);
}
async findById(orderId: string): Promise<Order | null> {
const row = await this.db.oneOrNone("select * from orders where id = $1", [orderId]);
return row ? Order.rehydrate(row) : null;
}
}
Composition root
export const buildCreateOrderUseCase = (deps: { db: SqlClient; stripe: StripeClient }) => {
const orderRepository = new PostgresOrderRepository(deps.db);
const paymentGateway = new StripePaymentGateway(deps.stripe);
return new CreateOrderUseCase(orderRepository, paymentGateway);
};
Multi-Language Mapping
Use the same boundary rules across ecosystems; only syntax and wiring style change.
- TypeScript/JavaScript
- Ports:
application/ports/*as interfaces/types. - Use cases: classes/functions with constructor/argument injection.
- Adapters:
adapters/inbound/*,adapters/outbound/*. - Composition: explicit factory/container module (no hidden globals).
- Ports:
- Java
- Packages:
domain,application.port.in,application.port.out,application.usecase,adapter.in,adapter.out. - Ports: interfaces in
application.port.*. - Use cases: plain classes (Spring
@Serviceis optional, not required). - Composition: Spring config or manual wiring class; keep wiring out of domain/use-case classes.
- Packages:
- Kotlin
- Modules/packages mirror the Java split (
domain,application.port,application.usecase,adapter). - Ports: Kotlin interfaces.
- Use cases: classes with constructor injection (Koin/Dagger/Spring/manual).
- Composition: module definitions or dedicated composition functions; avoid service locator patterns.
- Modules/packages mirror the Java split (
- Go
- Packages:
internal/<feature>/domain,application,ports,adapters/inbound,adapters/outbound. - Ports: small interfaces owned by the consuming application package.
- Use cases: structs with interface fields plus explicit
New...constructors. - Composition: wire in
cmd/<app>/main.go(or dedicated wiring package), keep constructors explicit.
- Packages:
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
- Domain entities importing ORM models, web framework types, or SDK clients.
- Use cases reading directly from
req,res, or queue metadata. - Returning database rows directly from use cases without domain/application mapping.
- Letting adapters call each other directly instead of flowing through use-case ports.
- Spreading dependency wiring across many files with hidden global singletons.
Migration Playbook
- Pick one vertical slice (single endpoint/job) with frequent change pain.
- Extract a use-case boundary with explicit input/output types.
- Introduce outbound ports around existing infrastructure calls.
- Move orchestration logic from controllers/services into the use case.
- Keep old adapters, but make them delegate to the new use case.
- Add tests around the new boundary (unit + adapter integration).
- Repeat slice-by-slice; avoid full rewrites.
Refactoring Existing Systems
- Strangler approach: keep current endpoints, route one use case at a time through new ports/adapters.
- No big-bang rewrites: migrate per feature slice and preserve behavior with characterization tests.
- Facade first: wrap legacy services behind outbound ports before replacing internals.
- Composition freeze: centralize wiring early so new dependencies do not leak into domain/use-case layers.
- Slice selection rule: prioritize high-churn, low-blast-radius flows first.
- Rollback path: keep a reversible toggle or route switch per migrated slice until production behavior is verified.
Testing Guidance (Same Hexagonal Boundaries)
- Domain tests: test entities/value objects as pure business rules (no mocks, no framework setup).
- Use-case unit tests: test orchestration with fakes/stubs for outbound ports; assert business outcomes and port interactions.
- Outbound adapter contract tests: define shared contract suites at port level and run them against each adapter implementation.
- Inbound adapter tests: verify protocol mapping (HTTP/CLI/queue payload to use-case input and output/error mapping back to protocol).
- Adapter integration tests: run against real infrastructure (DB/API/queue) for serialization, schema/query behavior, retries, and timeouts.
- End-to-end tests: cover critical user journeys through inbound adapter -> use case -> outbound adapter.
- Refactor safety: add characterization tests before extraction; keep them until new boundary behavior is stable and equivalent.
Best Practices Checklist
- Domain and use-case layers import only internal types and ports.
- Every external dependency is represented by an outbound port.
- Validation occurs at boundaries (inbound adapter + use-case invariants).
- Use immutable transformations (return new values/entities instead of mutating shared state).
- Errors are translated across boundaries (infra errors -> application/domain errors).
- Composition root is explicit and easy to audit.
- Use cases are testable with simple in-memory fakes for ports.
- Refactoring starts from one vertical slice with behavior-preserving tests.
- Language/framework specifics stay in adapters, never in domain rules.
Related Skills
taste-skill
112.1kAgent skills that give coding agents taste: art direction, reference images and a browser check instead of generic AI pages
ruflo
81.3k🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated
headroom
79.2kCompress tool outputs, logs, files, and RAG chunks before they reach the LLM. 20% fewer tokens for coding agents, 60-95% fewer tokens for JSON, same answers. Library, proxy, MCP server.
ai-job-search
70.6kThe job search that runs on your machine. AI job application framework built on Claude Code: evaluate postings, tailor CVs, write cover letters, prep interviews. Fork it and own it.
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
