SkillAgentSearch skills...

error-scan

Scan recent Claude Code activity for errors and failure signals across all sessions using Agent Monitor data — APIError events and PreToolUse→PostToolUse gaps (tools that started but never completed) — then group failures by tool and model and rank them by frequency

Install / Use

npx skills add hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor --skill error-scan

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

81/100

Category

Operations

Supported Platforms

Claude Code

Our assessment of error-scan

error-scan scores 81/100 on our quality scale, 622nd of 751 Operations skills we index.

Its SKILL.md is 3.0 KB long, well organised into 10 sections and no code examples: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.

With 1,015 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
26/30
Structure
13/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
13/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 10 days ago, so error-scan is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

error-scan compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than error-scan; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
error-scan (this skill)by hoangsonww811.0k10d agoSKILL.md
Agent-Reachby Panniantong10089.8k18d agoCLAUDE.md
headroomby headroomlabs-ai10074.4ktodayCLAUDE.md
Scraplingby D4Vinci10085.5ktodayMCP Server
crawl4aiby unclecode10084.7k8d agoMCP Server

Frequently asked questions

How do I install error-scan?
Run npx skills add hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor --skill error-scan. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does error-scan work with?
It is written for Claude Code, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is error-scan safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is error-scan still maintained?
The repository was last updated 10 days ago, so error-scan is actively maintained.

name: error-scan description: > Scan recent Claude Code activity for errors and failure signals across all sessions using Agent Monitor data — APIError events and PreToolUse→PostToolUse gaps (tools that started but never completed) — then group failures by tool and model and rank them by frequency. Use when checking for errors or asking "what's failing right now".

Error Scan

Sweep recent events across sessions for error and failure signals, then rank them by how often they occur and which tool or model produced them.

Input

The user provides: $ARGUMENTS

This may be:

  • empty or "all" — scan every failure signal (default)
  • "api" — APIError events only
  • "tools" — tool-failure gaps only
  • a number N — limit the scan to the most recent N sessions
  • a session ID — scan a single session

Data Sources

| Endpoint | Returns | |----------|---------| | GET /api/analytics | event_types (counts per type incl. PreToolUse, PostToolUse, APIError), tool_usage (top 20), daily_events (365d) — fleet-wide failure baseline | | GET /api/events?session_id=X | Per-session event stream: event_type, tool_name, summary, data, timestamp — locate APIError and unmatched PreToolUse | | GET /api/sessions?limit=N | Sessions with id, status, model, started_at — pick the recent window and attribute failures to a model |

Report Sections

1. Scope

Resolve $ARGUMENTS to a session set: pull GET /api/sessions?limit=N (default 50, ordered by started_at). Report how many sessions and what time span are covered.

2. Fleet Failure Counts

From GET /api/analytics event_types, report total APIError count and the PreToolUse→PostToolUse gap: gap = PreToolUse − PostToolUse (unmatched tool starts = likely failures). State both as raw counts and as a share of total_events.

3. Group by Tool

For each session in scope, pull GET /api/events?session_id=X. Match each PreToolUse to its following PostToolUse by tool_name; unmatched starts are failures. Aggregate failures and APIError events per tool_name. Rank tools by failure frequency (descending).

4. Group by Model

Join failures to the owning session's model (from GET /api/sessions). Rank models by APIError count and tool-failure count.

5. Top Offenders

List the single most failure-prone tool, the most error-prone model, and the session with the most failures, each with its exact count and one-line summary excerpt from a representative event.

Output

  • A ranked Markdown table: tool/model | APIError count | tool-failure (gap) count | total failures | share of events.
  • Rates as percentages to 2 decimals.
  • Cite exact event_type, tool_name, and session_id values — never fabricate counts.
  • End with the one failure pattern most worth investigating and a concrete next step.
  • Read-only: only report what the API returns. If curl cannot reach http://localhost:4820, tell the user to start the dashboard with npm start from the repo root.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars1.0k
CategoryOperations
Updated10d ago
Forks238

Languages

JavaScript

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions