SkillAgentSearch skills...

content-evidence-brief

Use when designing a long-form marketing or developer content piece from a source pack before drafting. Not for publishing the article or cross-posting it.

Install / Use

npx skills add gosuda/dstack --skill content-evidence-brief

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

62/100

Category

Marketing

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of content-evidence-brief

content-evidence-brief scores 62/100 on our quality scale, 556th of 572 Marketing skills we index.

Its SKILL.md is 2.5 KB long, split into 5 sections and no code examples: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.

It has no GitHub stars yet, so there is no community track record; judge it on its content.

Substance
26/30
Structure
11/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
0/20
Freshness
5/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • We could not determine when the repository was last updated.
  • No license is declared. By default that means all rights are reserved: you can read it, but reusing or redistributing it is not clearly permitted. Ask the author before building on it commercially.
  • Its trust signals score 68/100, with 3 cautions from licensing, adoption, age or documentation. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

content-evidence-brief compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than content-evidence-brief; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
content-evidence-brief (this skill)by gosuda620—SKILL.md
taste-skillby Leonxlnx100106.0ktodayCLAUDE.md
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k38d agoSKILL.md
pptxby anthropics100177.9k38d agoSKILL.md
designby nextlevelbuilder100137.2k15d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install content-evidence-brief?
Run npx skills add gosuda/dstack --skill content-evidence-brief. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does content-evidence-brief work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is content-evidence-brief safe to use?
It declares no license and scores 68/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is content-evidence-brief still maintained?
We could not determine when the repository was last updated.

name: content-evidence-brief description: 'Use when designing a long-form marketing or developer content piece from a source pack before drafting. Not for publishing the article or cross-posting it.'

Content evidence brief

You design the editorial brief a long form piece is written from, before anyone drafts it. The brief fixes one reader in one situation getting one useful outcome, maps every usable piece of evidence to its source, and derives the structure from the material rather than from a formula. No publishable article comes out of this skill by default.

Drafting the full article, publishing, or distributing it is out of scope. Hand the approved brief to developer-content when the piece is a developer content package; otherwise hand it to the writing owner the user names.

What the brief is built from

  • topic: the piece subject, or a source pack of supplied material.
  • reader: one target reader in one situation.
  • outcome: the one useful outcome the reader gets.
  • sources (optional): approved sources, or an explicit read only research request.

If the reader or the outcome is missing, ask once and stop until they are supplied.

How the brief gets built

  1. Fix one reader, one situation, one outcome. Reject multi reader briefs and split them instead.
  2. Map the evidence. List every usable fact, firsthand experience, quotation, and interpretation with its source, and mark gaps visibly.
  3. Keep facts, experience, quotations, interpretation, and recommendation in separate labeled sections. Never let one case quietly become a general claim. A general claim stays only with multi case support stated beside it.
  4. Choose the structure family from the material and state each section purpose in one line tied to the reader outcome.
  5. Add channel or format adaptations (length, code depth, visual needs) as advisory notes only, never as finished adaptations. The master brief stands alone.
  6. Run final QA: every factual claim traces to the source map, quotations are verbatim with provenance, gaps are visible, and no data, quotes, or results are invented.

When the material cannot carry the promise

  • The source pack is too thin for the promised outcome: narrow the outcome or name the missing sources. Do not pad with invention.

What you deliver

An editorial brief in chat: reader, situation, outcome, angle, evidence map with sources and gaps, structure family with section purposes, adaptation notes, and the QA record. Nothing is published, cross posted, or distributed, and no accounts are used.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars0
CategoryMarketing
UpdatedNaNy ago
Forks0

Trust signals

68/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

2 medium1 low
content-evidence-brief — Universal Skill: Install & Safety Check | SkillAgent