unit-test-parameterized
Provides parameterized testing patterns with JUnit 5, generates data-driven unit tests using @ParameterizedTest, @ValueSource, @CsvSource, @MethodSource. Creates tests that run the same logic with multiple input values
Install / Use
npx skills add giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill unit-test-parameterizedInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
SKILL.md
Installable skill definition
Quality Score
Category
Data & AnalyticsSupported Platforms
Our assessment of unit-test-parameterized
unit-test-parameterized scores 89/100 on our quality scale, 317th of 589 Data & Analytics skills we index.
Its SKILL.md is 6.2 KB long, well organised into 16 sections with 9 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.
It has 353 GitHub stars, a meaningful sign that others use it.
Maintenance, license and trust
- The repository was last updated 26 days ago, so unit-test-parameterized is actively maintained.
- It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
- Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
Safety scan
No issues foundOur scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands.
Automated pattern scan on 2026-10-07. It catches known dangerous patterns, not every risk — read a skill before letting an agent act on it.
unit-test-parameterized compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than unit-test-parameterized; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| unit-test-parameterized (this skill)by giuseppe-trisciuoglio | 89 | 353 | 26d ago | SKILL.md |
| algorithmic-artby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 14d ago | SKILL.md |
| pptxby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 14d ago | SKILL.md |
| designby nextlevelbuilder | 100 | 130.2k | 15d ago | SKILL.md |
| ui-ux-pro-maxby nextlevelbuilder | 100 | 130.2k | 15d ago | SKILL.md |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install unit-test-parameterized?
- Run
npx skills add giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill unit-test-parameterized. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does unit-test-parameterized work with?
- It is written for Zed, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is unit-test-parameterized safe to use?
- Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is unit-test-parameterized still maintained?
- The repository was last updated 26 days ago, so unit-test-parameterized is actively maintained.
Skill content
View source on GitHubname: unit-test-parameterized description: Provides parameterized testing patterns with JUnit 5, generates data-driven unit tests using @ParameterizedTest, @ValueSource, @CsvSource, @MethodSource. Creates tests that run the same logic with multiple input values. Use when writing data-driven Java tests, multiple test cases from single method, or boundary value analysis. allowed-tools: Read, Write, Bash, Glob, Grep
Parameterized Unit Tests with JUnit 5
Overview
Provides patterns for parameterized unit tests in Java using JUnit 5. Covers @ValueSource, @CsvSource, @MethodSource, @EnumSource, @ArgumentsSource, and custom display names. Reduces test duplication by running the same test logic with multiple input values.
When to Use
- Writing JUnit tests with multiple input combinations
- Implementing data-driven tests in Java
- Running same test with different values (boundary analysis)
- Testing multiple scenarios from single test method
Instructions
- Add dependency: Ensure
junit-jupiter-paramsis on test classpath (included injunit-jupiter) - Choose source:
@ValueSourcefor simple values,@CsvSourcefor tabular data,@MethodSourcefor complex objects - Match parameters: Test method parameters must match data source types
- Set display names: Use
name = "{0}..."for readable output - Validate: Run
./gradlew test --infoormvn testand verify all parameter combinations execute
Examples
Maven / Gradle Dependency
JUnit 5 parameterized tests require junit-jupiter (includes params). Add assertj-core for assertions:
<!-- Maven -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.junit.jupiter</groupId>
<artifactId>junit-jupiter</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
// Gradle
testImplementation("org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter")
@ValueSource — Simple Values
import org.junit.jupiter.params.ParameterizedTest;
import org.junit.jupiter.params.provider.ValueSource;
import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.*;
@ParameterizedTest
@ValueSource(strings = {"hello", "world", "test"})
void shouldCapitalizeAllStrings(String input) {
assertThat(StringUtils.capitalize(input)).isNotEmpty();
}
@ParameterizedTest
@ValueSource(ints = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5})
void shouldBePositive(int number) {
assertThat(number).isPositive();
}
@ParameterizedTest
@ValueSource(ints = {Integer.MIN_VALUE, -1, 0, 1, Integer.MAX_VALUE})
void shouldHandleBoundaryValues(int value) {
assertThat(Math.incrementExact(value)).isGreaterThan(value);
}
@CsvSource — Tabular Data
import org.junit.jupiter.params.ParameterizedTest;
import org.junit.jupiter.params.provider.CsvSource;
@ParameterizedTest
@CsvSource({
"alice@example.com, true",
"bob@gmail.com, true",
"invalid-email, false",
"user@, false",
"@example.com, false"
})
void shouldValidateEmailAddresses(String email, boolean expected) {
assertThat(UserValidator.isValidEmail(email)).isEqualTo(expected);
}
@MethodSource — Complex Data
import org.junit.jupiter.params.ParameterizedTest;
import org.junit.jupiter.params.provider.MethodSource;
import java.util.stream.Stream;
@ParameterizedTest
@MethodSource("additionTestCases")
void shouldAddNumbersCorrectly(int a, int b, int expected) {
assertThat(Calculator.add(a, b)).isEqualTo(expected);
}
static Stream<Arguments> additionTestCases() {
return Stream.of(
Arguments.of(1, 2, 3),
Arguments.of(0, 0, 0),
Arguments.of(-1, 1, 0),
Arguments.of(100, 200, 300)
);
}
@EnumSource — Enum Values
@ParameterizedTest
@EnumSource(Status.class)
void shouldHandleAllStatuses(Status status) {
assertThat(status).isNotNull();
}
@ParameterizedTest
@EnumSource(value = Status.class, names = {"ACTIVE", "INACTIVE"})
void shouldHandleSpecificStatuses(Status status) {
assertThat(status).isIn(Status.ACTIVE, Status.INACTIVE);
}
Custom Display Names
@ParameterizedTest(name = "Discount of {0}% should be calculated correctly")
@ValueSource(ints = {5, 10, 15, 20})
void shouldApplyDiscount(int discountPercent) {
double result = DiscountCalculator.apply(100.0, discountPercent);
assertThat(result).isEqualTo(100.0 * (1 - discountPercent / 100.0));
}
Custom ArgumentsProvider
class RangeValidatorProvider implements ArgumentsProvider {
@Override
public Stream<? extends Arguments> provideArguments(ExtensionContext context) {
return Stream.of(
Arguments.of(0, 0, 100, true),
Arguments.of(50, 0, 100, true),
Arguments.of(-1, 0, 100, false),
Arguments.of(101, 0, 100, false)
);
}
}
@ParameterizedTest
@ArgumentsSource(RangeValidatorProvider.class)
void shouldValidateRange(int value, int min, int max, boolean expected) {
assertThat(RangeValidator.isInRange(value, min, max)).isEqualTo(expected);
}
Error Condition Testing
@ParameterizedTest
@ValueSource(strings = {"", " ", null})
void shouldThrowExceptionForInvalidInput(String input) {
assertThatThrownBy(() -> Parser.parse(input))
.isInstanceOf(IllegalArgumentException.class);
}
Best Practices
- Use descriptive display names:
name = "{0}..."for readable output - Test boundary values: include min, max, zero, and edge cases
- Keep test logic focused: single assertion per parameter set
- Use
@MethodSourcefor complex objects,@CsvSourcefor tabular data - Organize test data logically — group related scenarios together
Constraints and Warnings
- Parameter count must match: Number of parameters from source must match test method signature
@ValueSourcelimitation: Only supports primitives, strings, and enums — not objects or null directly- CSV escaping: Strings with commas must use single quotes in
@CsvSource @MethodSourcevisibility: Factory methods must be static in the same test class- Display name placeholders: Use
{0},{1}, etc. to reference parameters - Execution count: Each parameter set runs as a separate test invocation
References
Related Skills
algorithmic-art
177.9kCreating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems.
pptx
177.9kUse this skill any time a .pptx or .potx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx or .potx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an em…
design
130.2kComprehensive design skill: brand identity, design tokens, UI styling, logo generation (55 styles, Gemini, Atlas Cloud, or MuAPI AI), corporate identity program (50 deliverables, CIP mockups), HTML presentations (Chart.js), banner design (22 styles, social/ads/web/print), icon design (15 styles, SVG…
ui-ux-pro-max
130.2kUI/UX design intelligence for web, mobile, and desktop. This skill should be used when designing, building, reviewing, or fixing interfaces, including pages, components, design systems, accessibility, interaction, responsive layout, typography, color, charts, and stack-specific UI implementation.
Languages
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
