nextjs-code-review
Provides comprehensive code review capability for Next.js applications, validates Server Components, Client Components, Server Actions, caching strategies, metadata, API routes, middleware, and performance patterns
Install / Use
npx skills add giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill nextjs-code-reviewInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
SKILL.md
Installable skill definition
Quality Score
Category
Development & EngineeringSupported Platforms
Our assessment of nextjs-code-review
nextjs-code-review scores 89/100 on our quality scale, 1600th of 4,595 Development & Engineering skills we index (top 35%).
Its SKILL.md is 10 KB long, well organised into 20 sections with 5 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.
It has 353 GitHub stars, a meaningful sign that others use it.
Maintenance, license and trust
- The repository was last updated 26 days ago, so nextjs-code-review is actively maintained.
- It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
- Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
Safety scan
No issues foundOur scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands.
Automated pattern scan on 2026-10-07. It catches known dangerous patterns, not every risk — read a skill before letting an agent act on it.
nextjs-code-review compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than nextjs-code-review; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| nextjs-code-review (this skill)by giuseppe-trisciuoglio | 89 | 353 | 26d ago | SKILL.md |
| Agent-Reachby Panniantong | 100 | 92.6k | 21d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| headroomby headroomlabs-ai | 100 | 74.5k | today | CLAUDE.md |
| ai-job-searchby MadsLorentzen | 100 | 45.1k | 1d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| claude-howtoby luongnv89 | 100 | 41.8k | 6d ago | CLAUDE.md |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install nextjs-code-review?
- Run
npx skills add giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill nextjs-code-review. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does nextjs-code-review work with?
- It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is nextjs-code-review safe to use?
- Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is nextjs-code-review still maintained?
- The repository was last updated 26 days ago, so nextjs-code-review is actively maintained.
Skill content
View source on GitHubname: nextjs-code-review description: Provides comprehensive code review capability for Next.js applications, validates Server Components, Client Components, Server Actions, caching strategies, metadata, API routes, middleware, and performance patterns. Use when reviewing Next.js App Router code changes, before merging pull requests, after implementing new features, or for architecture validation. Triggers on "review Next.js code", "Next.js code review", "check my Next.js app". allowed-tools: Read, Edit, Grep, Glob, Bash
Next.js Code Review
Overview
Evaluates Next.js App Router code against best practices for Server Components, Client Components, Server Actions, caching strategies, and production-readiness criteria. Produces actionable findings categorized by severity with concrete code examples. Delegates to typescript-software-architect-review agent for architectural analysis.
When to Use
- Reviewing Next.js pages, layouts, and route segments before merging
- Validating Server Component vs Client Component boundaries
- Checking Server Actions for security and correctness
- Reviewing data fetching patterns (fetch, cache, revalidation)
- Evaluating caching strategies (static generation, ISR, dynamic rendering)
- Assessing middleware implementations (authentication, redirects, rewrites)
- Reviewing API route handlers for proper request/response handling
- Validating metadata configuration for SEO
- Checking loading, error, and not-found page implementations
- After implementing new Next.js features or migrating from Pages Router
Instructions
-
Identify Scope: Determine which Next.js route segments and components are under review. Use
globto discoverpage.tsx,layout.tsx,loading.tsx,error.tsx,route.ts, andmiddleware.tsfiles. -
Analyze Component Boundaries: Verify proper Server Component / Client Component separation. Check that
'use client'is placed only where necessary and as deep in the component tree as possible. Ensure Server Components don't import client-only modules. -
Review Data Fetching: Validate fetch patterns — check for proper
cacheandrevalidateoptions, parallel data fetching withPromise.all, and avoidance of request waterfalls. Verify that server-side data fetching doesn't expose sensitive data to the client. -
Evaluate Caching Strategy: Review static vs dynamic rendering decisions. Check
generateStaticParamsusage for static generation,revalidatePath/revalidateTagfor on-demand revalidation, and proper cache headers for API routes. -
Assess Server Actions: Review form actions for proper validation (both client and server-side), error handling, optimistic updates with
useOptimistic, and security (ensure actions don't expose sensitive operations without authorization). -
Check Middleware: Review middleware for proper request matching, authentication/authorization logic, response modification, and performance impact. Verify it runs only on necessary routes.
-
Review Metadata & SEO: Check
generateMetadatafunctions, Open Graph tags, structured data,robots.txt, andsitemap.xmlconfigurations. Verify dynamic metadata is properly implemented for pages with variable content. -
Validate Findings: Before finalizing, verify each issue by checking the actual code context. Confirm the pattern violation exists, ensure the suggested fix is applicable to the codebase, and remove any false positives.
-
Produce Review Report: Generate a structured report with severity-classified findings (Critical, Warning, Suggestion), positive observations, and prioritized recommendations with code examples.
Examples
Example 1: Server/Client Component Boundaries
// ❌ Bad: Entire page marked as client when only a button needs interactivity
'use client';
export default async function ProductPage({ params }: { params: { id: string } }) {
const product = await fetch(`/api/products/${params.id}`);
return (
<div>
<h1>{product.name}</h1>
<p>{product.description}</p>
<button onClick={() => addToCart(product.id)}>Add to Cart</button>
</div>
);
}
// ✅ Good: Server Component with isolated Client Component
// app/products/[id]/page.tsx (Server Component)
import { AddToCartButton } from './add-to-cart-button';
export default async function ProductPage({ params }: { params: Promise<{ id: string }> }) {
const { id } = await params;
const product = await getProduct(id);
return (
<div>
<h1>{product.name}</h1>
<p>{product.description}</p>
<AddToCartButton productId={product.id} />
</div>
);
}
// app/products/[id]/add-to-cart-button.tsx (Client Component)
'use client';
export function AddToCartButton({ productId }: { productId: string }) {
return <button onClick={() => addToCart(productId)}>Add to Cart</button>;
}
Example 2: Data Fetching Patterns
// ❌ Bad: Sequential data fetching creates waterfall
export default async function DashboardPage() {
const user = await getUser();
const orders = await getOrders(user.id);
const analytics = await getAnalytics(user.id);
return <Dashboard user={user} orders={orders} analytics={analytics} />;
}
// ✅ Good: Parallel data fetching with proper Suspense boundaries
export default async function DashboardPage() {
const user = await getUser();
const [orders, analytics] = await Promise.all([
getOrders(user.id),
getAnalytics(user.id),
]);
return <Dashboard user={user} orders={orders} analytics={analytics} />;
}
// ✅ Even better: Streaming with Suspense for independent sections
export default async function DashboardPage() {
const user = await getUser();
return (
<div>
<UserHeader user={user} />
<Suspense fallback={<OrdersSkeleton />}>
<OrdersSection userId={user.id} />
</Suspense>
<Suspense fallback={<AnalyticsSkeleton />}>
<AnalyticsSection userId={user.id} />
</Suspense>
</div>
);
}
Example 3: Server Actions Security
// ❌ Bad: Server Action without validation or authorization
'use server';
export async function deleteUser(id: string) {
await db.user.delete({ where: { id } });
}
// ✅ Good: Server Action with validation, authorization, and error handling
'use server';
import { z } from 'zod';
import { auth } from '@/lib/auth';
import { revalidatePath } from 'next/cache';
const deleteUserSchema = z.object({ id: z.string().uuid() });
export async function deleteUser(rawData: { id: string }) {
const session = await auth();
if (!session || session.user.role !== 'admin') {
throw new Error('Unauthorized');
}
const { id } = deleteUserSchema.parse(rawData);
await db.user.delete({ where: { id } });
revalidatePath('/admin/users');
}
Example 4: Caching and Revalidation
// ❌ Bad: No cache control, fetches on every request
export default async function BlogPage() {
const posts = await fetch('https://api.example.com/posts').then(r => r.json());
return <PostList posts={posts} />;
}
// ✅ Good: Explicit caching with time-based revalidation
export default async function BlogPage() {
const posts = await fetch('https://api.example.com/posts', {
next: { revalidate: 3600, tags: ['blog-posts'] },
}).then(r => r.json());
return <PostList posts={posts} />;
}
// Revalidation in Server Action
'use server';
export async function publishPost(data: FormData) {
await db.post.create({ data: parseFormData(data) });
revalidateTag('blog-posts');
}
Example 5: Middleware Review
// ❌ Bad: Middleware runs on all routes including static assets
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server';
export function middleware(request: NextRequest) {
const session = request.cookies.get('session');
if (!session) {
return NextResponse.redirect(new URL('/login', request.url));
}
}
// Missing config.matcher
// ✅ Good: Scoped middleware with proper matcher
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server';
import type { NextRequest } from 'next/server';
export function middleware(request: NextRequest) {
const session = request.cookies.get('session');
if (!session) {
return NextResponse.redirect(new URL('/login', request.url));
}
return NextResponse.next();
}
export const config = {
matcher: ['/dashboard/:path*', '/api/protected/:path*'],
};
Review Output Format
Structure all code review findings as follows:
1. Summary
Brief overview with an overall quality score (1-10) and key observations.
2. Critical Issues (Must Fix)
Issues causing security vulnerabilities, data exposure, or broken functionality.
3. Warnings (Should Fix)
Issues that violate best practices, cause performance problems, or reduce maintainability.
4. Suggestions (Consider Improving)
Improvements for code organization, performance, or developer experience.
5. Positive Observations
Well-implemented patterns and good practices to acknowledge.
6. Recommendations
Prioritized next steps with code examples for the most impactful improvements.
Best Practices
- Keep
'use client'boundaries as deep in the tree as possible - Fetch data in Server Components — avoid client-side fetching for initial data
- Use parallel data fetching (
Promise.all) to avoid request waterfalls - Implement proper loading, error, and not-found states for every route segment
- Validate all Server Action inputs with Zod or similar libraries
- Use
revalidatePath/revalidateTaginstead of time-based revalidation when possible - Scope middleware to specific routes with
config.matcher - Implement
generateMetadatafor dynamic pages with variable content - Use
generateStaticParamsfor static pages with known parameters - Avoid importing server-only code in Client Components — use the
server-onlypackage
Constraints and Warnings
- This skill targets Next.js App Router — Pages Router patterns may differ significantly
- Respect the project's Next.js version — some features are version-specific
- Do not suggest migrating from Pages Router to App Router unless explicitly requested
- Caching behavior differs between development and production — validate in production builds
- Server Actions must never expose sensitive operations without proper authentication checks
- Focus on high-confidence issues — avoid false positives on style preferences
References
See the references/ directory for detailed review checklists and pattern documentation:
references/app-router-patterns.md— App Router best practices and patternsreferences/server-components.md— Server Component and Client Component boundary guidereferences/performance.md— Next.js performance optimization checklist
Related Skills
Agent-Reach
92.6kGive your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Read & search Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu — one CLI, zero API fees.
headroom
74.5kCompress tool outputs, logs, files, and RAG chunks before they reach the LLM. 20% fewer tokens for coding agents, 60-95% fewer tokens for JSON, same answers. Library, proxy, MCP server.
ai-job-search
45.1kThe job search that runs on your machine. AI job application framework built on Claude Code: evaluate postings, tailor CVs, write cover letters, prep interviews. Fork it and own it.
claude-howto
41.8kA visual, example-driven guide to Claude Code — from basic concepts to advanced agents, with copy-paste templates that bring immediate value.
Languages
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
