SkillAgentSearch skills...

Rtype

Intuitive structural type notation for JavaScript.

Install / Use

/learn @ericelliott/Rtype
About this skill

Quality Score

0/100

Supported Platforms

Universal

README

Rtype

Join the chat at https://gitter.im/ericelliott/rtype

Intuitive structural type notation for JavaScript.

(parameterName: Type) => ReturnType
<!-- START doctoc generated TOC please keep comment here to allow auto update --> <!-- DON'T EDIT THIS SECTION, INSTEAD RE-RUN doctoc TO UPDATE -->

Table of Contents

<!-- END doctoc generated TOC please keep comment here to allow auto update -->

About Rtype

  • Great for simple documentation.
  • Compiler-agnostic type notation - for use with ECMAScript standard tools.
  • Low learning curve for JavaScript developers.
  • Can embed in JS as strings, for example with rfx for easy runtime reflection.
  • Standing on the shoulders of giants. Inspired by: ES6, TypeScript, Haskell, Flow, & React

What is Rtype?

Rtype is a JS-native representation of structural type interfaces with a TypeScript-inspired notation that's great for documentation.

Status: RFC

Developer preview. Please comment.

Currently in-use for production library API documentation, but breaking changes are expected.

In the future, libraries may parse rtype strings and return predicate functions for runtime type checking. Static analysis tools are also possible, but no significant developer tooling is currently available. Feel free to build some!

Why?

Perhaps the most important part of API documentation is to quickly grasp the function signatures and data structures required to work with the API. There are existing standards for this stuff, but we think we can improve on them:

  • JSDoc is too verbose, not intuitive, and painful to maintain.
  • TypeScript's structural types are very appealing, but opting into TypeScript's JS superset and runtime limitations is not.

We want a type representation that is very clear to modern JavaScript developers (ES2015+), that could potentially be used at runtime with simple utilities.

Why Not Just Use TypeScript?

We want the best of all worlds:

  • An intuitive way to describe interfaces for the purposes of documentation, particularly function signatures.
  • Runtime accessible type reflection (even in production) with optional runtime type checks that can be disabled in production (like React.PropTypes). See rfx.
  • A way to specify types in standard ES2015+ code. Use any standard JS compiler. See rfx.
  • An easy way to generate interface documentation (like JSDoc).

TypeScript is great for compile-time and IDE features, and you could conceivably generate docs with it, but runtime features are lacking. For example, I want the ability to query function signatures inside the program at runtime, along with the ability to turn runtime type checking on and off. AFAIK, that's not possible with TypeScript (yet - there is experimental runtime support using experimental features of the ESNext Reflect API).

Reading Function Signatures

Function types are described by a function signature. The function signature tells you each parameter and its type, separated by a colon, and the corresponding return type:

(param: Type) => ReturnType

To make the signature familiar to readers, we use common JavaScript idioms such as destructuring, defaults, and rest parameters:

(...args: [...String]) => Any
({ count = 0: Number }) => Any

If a parameter or property has a default value, most built-in types can be inferred:

({ count = 0 }) => Any

If the type is a union or Any, it must be specified:

({ collection = []: Array | Object }) => Any

Optionally, you may name the return value, similar to named parameters:

(param: Type) => name: Type

Or even name a signature to reuse it later on:

connect(options: Object) => connection: Object

Optional Parameters

Optional parameters can be indicated with ?:

(param: Type, optParam?: Type) => ReturnType

Anonymous Parameters

Parameter names can be omitted:

is(Any) => Boolean

In the case of an anonymous optional parameter the type must be prefixed by ?::

toggle(String, ?: Boolean) => Boolean

In the case of an anonymous rest parameter, simply omit the name:

(...: [...Any]) => Array

Type Variables

Type variables are types that do not need to be declared in advance. They may represent any type, but a single type variable may only represent one type at a time in the scope of the signature being declared.

The signature for double is usually thought of like this:

double(x: Number) => Number

But what if we want it to accept objects as well?

const one = {
  name: 'One',
  valueOf: () => 1
};

double(one); // 2

In that case, we'll need to change the signature to use a type variable:

double(x: n) => Number

By convention, type variables are single letters and lowercased in order to visually distinguish them from predefined types. That way the reader doesn't need to scan back through documentation looking for a type declaration where there is no type declaration to be found.

Reserved Types

Builtin Types

Array, Boolean, Function, Number, Object, RegExp, String, Symbol
ArrayBuffer, Date, Error, Map, Promise, Proxy, Set, WeakMap, WeakSet
Notes
  • null is part of Any and is not covered by Object. If you want to allow null with Object, you must specify the union explicitly: Object | null
  • the Function builtin type expands to (...args: [...Any]) => Any

The Any Type

The special type Any means that any type is allowed:

(...args: [...Any]) => Array

The Void Type

The special type Void should only be used to indicate that a function returns no meaningful value (i.e., undefined). Since Void is the default return type, it can be optionally omitted. Nevertheless Void return types should usually be explicitly annotated to denote function side-effects.

set(name: String, value: String) => Void

Is equivalent to:

set(name: String, value: String)

The Predicate Type

The special type Predicate is a function with the following signature:

(...args: [...Any]) => Boolean

The Iterable Type

Arrays, typed arrays, strings, maps and sets are iterable. Additionally any object that implements the @@iterator method can be iterated.

(paramName: Iterable) => Void

Is equivalent to

interface Iterator {
  next() => {
    done: Boolean,
    value?: Any
  }
}

interface IterableObject {
  [Symbol.iterator]: () => Iterator
}

(paramName: IterableObject) => Void

The TypedArray Type

It covers these contructors: Int8Array, Uint8Array, Uint8ClampedArray, Int16Array, Uint16Array, Int32Array, Uint32Array, Float32Array, Float64Array.

Literal Types

Literals are also accepted as types.

signatureName(param1: String, param2: 'value1' | 'value2' | 'value3') => -1 | 0 | 1

Tuples

The type of arrays' elements can also be specified:

// an array that contains exactly 2 elements
[Number, String]

For ∅ or more and 1 or more element(s) of the same type you can use the rest operator like so:

// 0 or more
[...Number]

// 1 or more
[Number...]
//which is equivalent to
[Number, ...Number]

Union Types

Union types are denoted with the pipe symbol, |:

(userInput: String | Number) => String | Number

Negated Types

It is sometime easier and more informative to delimit a type by defining what it's not. The negation operator lets you exclude by substracting from Any.

JSON::parse(String, reviver: Function)
  => Boolean | Number | String | Object | Array | null,
  throws SyntaxError

// is less concise than

JSON::parse(String, reviver: Function)
  => !Function & !Void & !Symbol,
  throws SyntaxError

// which is equivalent to

JSON::parse(String, reviver: Function)
  => !(Function | Void | Symbol),
  throws SyntaxError

Constructors

Constructors in JavaScript require the new keyword. You can identify a constructor signature using the new keyword as if you were demonstrating usage:

new User({ username: String }) => UserInstance

In JavaScript, a class or constructor is not syno

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars1.1k
CategoryDevelopment
Updated8d ago
Forks38

Languages

JavaScript

Security Score

95/100

Audited on Mar 13, 2026

No findings